Hi Michael, thanks for the tips. I believe that would be a bit overkill for
this project though it would seem fun. I've decided to take a pretty
minimalistic approach:
- Start two seed nodes on AWS
- Have all the API servers connect to the cluster via these seed nodes
- Have all API se
Hi Sam,
I am also really interested in migrating from Wandoulabs to the new Akka WS
implementation.
So far this is the best example I could
find https://github.com/jrudolph/akka-http-scala-js-websocket-chat
Hope this helps,
Arnaud
On Saturday, May 23, 2015 at 12:38:22 PM UTC+2, Sam Halliday wr
I was talking with a coworker and he has some custom behavior he can't
understand how to do anything useful without.
He want's an tell message (a') sent from A -> C to not allow actor A to
continue until after there is confirmation that A's message is in C's
mailbox.
This way if a sends (a'') to
Hi Igor,
I have modified your initial implementation because on my tests it was
blocking the Akka system at shutdown so I simplified it for
SingleConsumerOnlyBoundedMailbox, look at the Akka git hub ticket and at my
forked branch:
https://github.com/akka/akka/issues/17558
Best regards and man
Ok, sorry for the noise. Guess I've been an "architect" too long... I
passed in "/n" instead of "\n" for the delimiter.
On Thursday, 21 May 2015 17:04:39 UTC-5, David Hooker wrote:
>
> Hi all-
>
> Seems like it should be simple, so I'm just missing something obvious.
> The various pages around
Hello,
I've been writing some simple code using FlexiMerge/FlexiRoute, and I'm
wondering why both have a single required "OperationAttributes" parameter?
Maybe there should be a * at the end to allow 0-* such parameters?
For lack of a better value, I'm currently using OperationAttributes.name,
Hi all,
I'm very excited that akka-io now has WebSocket support.
In ENSIME, we're planning on using this wrapper over wandoulab's websockets
https://github.com/smootoo/simple-spray-websockets
to easily create a REST/WebSockets endpoint with JSON marshalling for a
sealed family, with backpres
Thanks Johannes, didn't realize the inlets have different variance to the merge.
--
>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/
>> Check the FAQ:
>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html
>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.co
Using something like Spores you could ascertain that your partial function does
indeed not close over its surrounding Actor when creating anonymous Actors
inline, but Spores are still an experiment. An equally safe but not as elegant
solution is to declare the partial function in the Actor’s com