Re: [akka-user][deprecated] Akka Stream : MergeHub and BroadcastHub

2020-04-13 Thread Brian Maso
Ah, good factoid! Thanks! Brian Maso On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 03:29 Alexey Shuksto wrote: > > To be honest I'm not sure of how messages are handled when there are no > active Source[T] instances consuming messages sent to Broadcast.sink[T]... > > My impression is that they would be thrown away, an

Re: [akka-user][deprecated] Akka Stream : MergeHub and BroadcastHub

2020-04-13 Thread Alexey Shuksto
> To be honest I'm not sure of how messages are handled when there are no active Source[T] instances consuming messages sent to Broadcast.sink[T]... > My impression is that they would be thrown away, and the bufferSize parameter to BroadcastHub.sink[T] only comes into play when there are one or

Re: [akka-user][deprecated] Akka Stream : MergeHub and BroadcastHub

2020-04-10 Thread Brian Maso
I suggest you post your question on the gitter channel (gitter.im/akka/akka). There are a lot of knowledgeable people who can answer, and I think it is a much more active space than this (deprecated) list. But to answer your question: the materialized value of an asynchronous Sink is a Future[T].

[akka-user][deprecated] Akka Stream : MergeHub and BroadcastHub

2020-04-10 Thread Christophe De Troyer
Hi all, I've been looking at MergeHub and BroadcastHub for Akka Stream and I am a bit confused. In the beginning of the documentation the following is mentioned: It is important to remember that even after constructing the RunnableGraph > by connecting all the source, sink and different oper