Re: [akka-user] Akka Typed API discussion

It looks like if you were writing anything that wrapped another Behavior you would have code that is like what is in Widened which has to allow for Same, Deferred and Unhandled. If you look at Immutable as a potential model for wrtiting a simple class that extends behavior you see it is

Re: [akka-user] Akka Typed API discussion

There already is ExtensibleBehavior, does that not provide you with all the access and tools you need? > 18 juli 2017 kl. 13:53 skrev Bryan Murphy : > > I mostly agree with you and the NamedStateBehavior may only be useful when > you have well defined state transitions

Re: [akka-user] Akka Typed API discussion

I mostly agree with you and the NamedStateBehavior may only be useful when you have well defined state transitions (low change frequency) or not useful at all but the point is it I could write it and decide if it was useful if Behavour supported being extensible. I can't see how I could do

Re: [akka-user] Akka Typed API discussion

Hi Bryan, thanks for articulating your points! Regarding the first one I’d like to widen the scope of the discussion: is it useful to access the private state of a state machine for testing purposes? I know that I am guilty of creating the akka-testkit nearly seven years ago, allowing

Re: [akka-user] Akka Typed API discussion

Hi Bryan, The forum differs a bit depending on what you want to chat about. Do you have a few issues to talk about and they’re specific enough (and potentially could have an actionable outcome I’d assume/hope)? Then http://github.com/akka/akka would be the best, one ticket per specific issue, not

[akka-user] Akka Typed API discussion

Where is the best place to discuss the Akka Typed API ? I am hoping it is still open to change as I have some (reasonably lengthy) comments and suggestions to make so I want to make sure I give them in the correct forum. Is it here, a gitter channel, a github issue or somewhere else ? Thanks