Hopefully we can have a release candidate of 2.5.0 out within a month. The
more people that help out with the remaining tasks the quicker we can get
it done. See issues on github milestone 2.5.0. We can also release another
milestone if needed.
/Patrik
tors 2 feb. 2017 kl. 06:07 skrev Vadim Punski
What is the road map and timeline?
>
--
>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/
>> Check the FAQ:
>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html
>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user
---
You received this me
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Vadim Punski wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 4:02:51 PM UTC+2, Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Vadim Punski wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 4:29:13 PM UTC+2, Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>>
On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 4:02:51 PM UTC+2, Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Vadim Punski > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 4:29:13 PM UTC+2, Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> It's sent to one random node per tick, not all nodes.
>>>
>>
>>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Vadim Punski wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 4:29:13 PM UTC+2, Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's sent to one random node per tick, not all nodes.
>>
>
> Node per tick, you're right ...
>
>
>> The reason for sending all digests is to be able to find
On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 4:29:13 PM UTC+2, Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
>
> It's sent to one random node per tick, not all nodes.
>
Node per tick, you're right ...
> The reason for sending all digests is to be able to find entries that are
> not the same. Remember that message delivery is
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Vadim Punski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Akka and CRDT, so take the below with a grain of salt.
> I'm trying to implement the application requirements with thousands of
> LWW-Maps, not related to each other.
> The implementation itself is not the main issue I have
Hi,
I'm new to Akka and CRDT, so take the below with a grain of salt.
I'm trying to implement the application requirements with thousands of
LWW-Maps, not related to each other.
The implementation itself is not the main issue I have, but the internal
"distributed data" gossip protocol implementa
