On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Richard Rodseth wrote:
> Hi Patrik
>
> I'll try to clarify, though I think this minor code reuse point is
> tangential to my main question about the appropriateness of the ask pattern
> between service and blocking DAO.
>
> I suppose I should look at the ask patte
Hi Patrik
I'll try to clarify, though I think this minor code reuse point is
tangential to my main question about the appropriateness of the ask pattern
between service and blocking DAO.
I suppose I should look at the ask pattern source code, but presumably it
is counting on the recipient to repl
Hi Richard,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Richard Rodseth wrote:
> I realize this is well-trodden ground, but it's still a bit confusing for
> newcomers.
>
> Can we agree that the ask pattern is legitimate at the boundary between a
> service and repository/DAO?
>
> It seems to me that it is
I realize this is well-trodden ground, but it's still a bit confusing for
newcomers.
Can we agree that the ask pattern is legitimate at the boundary between a
service and repository/DAO?
It seems to me that it is reasonable to want to abstract away the
persistence layer in a way that doesn't *ass
