Perhaps it should be applied and it's just not implemented yet (as the
warning in the docs tell)?
tis 1 sep 2015 kl. 16:04 skrev Viktor Klang :
> I think there needs to be a very simple rule to remember for when the
> decider cannot be applied. Also, it is not obvious what the implication is
> of
I think there needs to be a very simple rule to remember for when the
decider cannot be applied. Also, it is not obvious what the implication is
of it not being consistently used.
--
Cheers,
√
On 1 Sep 2015 16:31, "Patrik Nordwall" wrote:
> ActorPublisher does not make use of that supervision d
ActorPublisher does not make use of that supervision decider. That is
something that should be clarified in the documentation (already discussed
in some issue).
If you can't use ordinary actor supervision for this actor you have to use
try-catch inside the actor.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:17 AM,
I've made few additions to my question here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32290285/custom-supervision-decider-doesnt-catch-exception-produced-by-actorpublisher
--
>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/
>> Check the FAQ:
>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/curre
