Thanks, Derek
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Derek Wyatt wrote:
> Alright. I'll play around with these over the next few days and send you a
> PR.
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:12 PM Patrik Nordwall
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Derek,
>> Sounds like a
Alright. I'll play around with these over the next few days and send you a
PR.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:12 PM Patrik Nordwall
wrote:
> Hi Derek,
> Sounds like a great addition. Will you take a stab at it?
> /Patrik
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Derek Wyatt
Hi Derek,
Sounds like a great addition. Will you take a stab at it?
/Patrik
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Derek Wyatt wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've been writing some tests for my stream code and have run up against a
> situation where I would like to have expectNextType.
Hi guys,
I've been writing some tests for my stream code and have run up against a
situation where I would like to have expectNextType. I've implemented this
myself with a pimp, but I'm wondering if there's a better way?
implicit class ProbeExtension[T](val p: Probe[T]) {
def