On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 12:25:36 AM UTC-8, rkuhn wrote:
>
> Hi Hbf,
>
> (which is a bit funny because I always read «Hauptbahnhof» :-) )
>
I can imagine :)
> there are no guarantees, we only promise at-most-once messaging. That
> said, local message sends are hard to drop without
Hi Hbf,
(which is a bit funny because I always read «Hauptbahnhof» :-) )
there are no guarantees, we only promise at-most-once messaging. That said,
local message sends are hard to drop without killing the JVM in the process.
But interrupting threads may result in undefined behavior (in
Hi everybody,
If a thread gets interrupted during a actor.tell(msg, sender), is it
guaranteed that the message still gets sent?
In my test case, the actor probe confirms that the message is indeed sent
but having read that there are minor differences between the dispatcher
used for tests and
