Hello:
I've created a patch for this. The only difference is that instead of
flattening to a particular depth, it flattens by a particular number
of levels. I thought this was more in the spirit of FLATTEN. If we
want to flatten to a particular depth, it is a trivial computation.
I've attached a
How is (:A 1 :D 4) wrong? There is no way to get it to just (:D 4) via
mutation when passing to a function. If we want to have just (:D 4),
we will need to either pass in
(nil nil plist)
which will give
(nil nil :D 4)
or we will need to encapsulate or box the value before going in, by
using
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Stas Boukarev stass...@gmail.com wrote:
It's wrong because it's completely useless, why would anyone use
delete-from-plist without using the value returned by it, if the
original list it modifies has the wrong result? Having to prepend two
NILs is just bogus.
Robert Smith q...@symbo1ics.com writes:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Stas Boukarev stass...@gmail.com wrote:
It's wrong because it's completely useless, why would anyone use
delete-from-plist without using the value returned by it, if the
original list it modifies has the wrong result?
