[algogeeks] good ebook links

2006-03-19 Thread Rohit
lot of ebook links and reference materials here. and other languages too http://online-books-reference.blogspot.com/ http://www.googlebooks.tk All the ebook links listed in this site is available in one zip file(Size 10KB) http://www.megaupload.com/?d=FN54H6ZZ guess this will be useful to

[algogeeks] Re: Balanced tree building

2006-03-19 Thread rainix
rainix wrote: let level_head_node(i) is the first node of the level i of the perfectly balanced BST .. node node_a = level_head_node(i);// get the first node of the levle i node node_b = level_head_node(i+1);// get the first node of the level i+1 node

[algogeeks] Re: Balanced tree building

2006-03-19 Thread rainix
rainix wrote: let level_head_node(i) is the first node of the level i of the perfectly balanced BST .. node node_a = level_head_node(i);// get the first node of the levle i node node_b = level_head_node(i+1);// get the first node of the level i+1 node

[algogeeks] Re: Balanced tree building

2006-03-19 Thread Gene
rainix wrote: 1 /\ 23 /\ /\ 4 5 6 7 /\ 8 9 (5) time cost: 2n, O(n) space cost: 3, O(1) Unfortunately this is not a BST. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

[algogeeks] Re: smallest maximum s-t network flow

2006-03-19 Thread geworm
Add 4 auxiliary nodes s',a,b and t' and split any existing node v[i] to v1[i], v2[i]. If there's an edge from v[i] to v[j], there would be an edge from v2[i] to v1[j] with capacity 1. The edges s'-s, t-t', a-any v2[i], any v1[i]-b, any v1[i]-v2[i] have infinity capacity. s'-a and b-t' has a

[algogeeks] Re: smallest maximum s-t network flow

2006-03-19 Thread geworm
Forget itThis is obviously wrong, I seems to came up with a solution to find the maximum s-t flow after deleting k edges. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this

[algogeeks] Re: determine whether a matrix is rearrangeable

2006-03-19 Thread subrahmanyam kambala
Hi..frns... here algorithms for this problem... 1st assume each row contains only 1. store the position of 1's in each row in one dimensional array. and use hash technique ..[ this is for to know whether any row is repeated or not ] if two numbers repeated this is not rearrangble matrix.

[algogeeks] Re: determine whether a matrix is rearrangeable

2006-03-19 Thread aj
SPX2 wrote: what complexity aj ? O(ne) where e is the n is the number of rows and e is the number of 1's in the matrix. worst case O(n^3). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group.

[algogeeks] Re: determine whether a matrix is rearrangeable

2006-03-19 Thread aj
the matrix 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 has rank 1, but is still rearrangable, so it seems linear dependence has not much to do with the problem. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To

[algogeeks] Re: Balanced tree building

2006-03-19 Thread Gene
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See, the idea is to build a max balanced tree. For which, we need to check the height of the tree only the first time There is an on line algorithm for this problem. An on line algorithm does not need to see all the input in advance. In this case, the on line

[algogeeks] Re: Balanced tree building

2006-03-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know that on line was not part of the initial spec, but the on line algorithm is simpler than some that have been proposed, so I suggest looking for it. I came across this problem (a college senior of mine was asked this very question in his Amazon interview). I settled for the following