http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq/virtual-functions.html
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:16 AM, rahul sharma rahul23111...@gmail.comwrote:
Guys i have read that concept of virtual fxn is not applicable in case of
constructors..I means using virtual function in constructors always call
local
This is the
linkhttp://apps.topcoder.com/forums/?module=ThreadthreadID=764182start=0mc=4#1614862to
the answer given by misof.. and it worked!!
On Sunday, 7 October 2012 00:41:48 UTC+5:30, kailash wrote:
@atul: No,it's not the correct answer. Let's take an example of star like
DAG:-
Hi Vicky.. Its O(n^K) as u are iterating over all the elements of array for
each of the k element subset!!
On Monday, 8 October 2012 23:53:15 UTC+5:30, ((** VICKY **)) wrote:
Hi, I wrote code for generating all possible sets of length k in a array
of length n. I did using recursion, but i'm
FYI ..
http://www.artima.com/cppsource/nevercall.html
If you read the VTABLE and and how virtual function is implemented then
you understand automatically why virtual is not applicable in constructor
case .
One more request its algo-group please try to avoid out of the topic
questions .
but i have read that reference is a const pointer
That is NOT true. A reference is not a const pointer. Period.
It's only because they 'point' to an object and cannot be changed to
'point' to some other object, people say its' a const pointer which is not
entirely true. References never 'point'
In short: Call for virtual function in constructor is redirected to the
local function because, the derived part of the object has not being
initialized yet(remember you are still in Bases' constructor) and it makes
no sense to call a derived's implementation of a virtual function, which in
turn
i have doubts in miscof answer ,
your question says that given graph is a DAG ,but in miscof's reply he is
considering directed graph which contain say n strongly connected component
, so if we consider dat there are n strongly connected component in your
graph then that graph is not a DAG(this
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
@atul.ok i got it thanx a lot
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:08 AM, atul anand atul.87fri...@gmail.com wrote:
@priya : i dont knw , how you came up with these values ...!!! and
aove code given is not a full code , it just a sketch of code to make
you understand.Before moving further,i would like
thnx a lot
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Saurabh Kumar srbh.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
but i have read that reference is a const pointer
That is NOT true. A reference is not a const pointer. Period.
It's only because they 'point' to an object and cannot be changed to
'point' to some other
@vishal...i know its algo group..i was not getting exact answer..so
posted...hope it will also help someone.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Saurabh Kumar srbh.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
In short: Call for virtual function in constructor is redirected to the
local function because, the
@Mohit: The decimal representation of a number ends in 5 if its low order
bit is 1 and it is divisibile by 5.
An algorithm using bitwise operations to check for divisibility by 5 is
given at https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/I5HWmwKW_ks/n38FWJSd0l8J.
It probably is not as fast as
12 matches
Mail list logo
