Hi Vikram!
Obviously The naivest solution is O(n2). Could you give a hint for
this problem?
On Oct 3, 4:39 pm, Vikram Singh singhvikram...@gmail.com wrote:
Given an array say A=(4,3,1,2). An array B is formed out of this in
such a way that B[i] = no. of elements in A, occuring on rhs of A[i],
Can we replace the operator (/) with 1^(-n) ?
On Sep 30, 12:54 pm, raju nikutel...@gmail.com wrote:
@nitin ..
Output array is not a new array ... you can do anything to input array ..
~raju
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Nitin Garg nitin.garg.i...@gmail.comwrote:
Can we assume
