[algogeeks] Re: adobe

2012-07-02 Thread Rishabh Agarwal
nrows: number of rows ncols: number of columns int **arra = (int **)malloc( sizeof(int*) * nrows ); int *ar = (int *)malloc( sizeof(int) * nrows * ncols ); for( int a = 0; a nrows; a ++ ) { arra[a] = ar + ncols * a; } now index of array i and j can be

Re: [algogeeks] Microsoft Interview Question

2012-06-21 Thread Rishabh Agarwal
@Abhi: if you apply quick sort then again the order will will not be intact -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/ic2CXJXSGuoJ. To post to this

Re: [algogeeks] Reverse Queue

2012-06-20 Thread Rishabh Agarwal
@Navin: as you say you have to take stack or some other data structure then it will definately not be donw in O(1) space complexity i think the recursive solution is best because we are not explicitly using any extra space its internal stack is using this space. -- You received this message