Re: [algogeeks] Re: ARICENT PATTERN

2012-02-26 Thread vivek kumar
hey guys any one have idea about aricent online paper .. plzzz tell me thankss On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:25 PM, vivek kumar kumarvivek1...@gmail.comwrote: can u provide me some question On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:59 AM, saurabh tripathi sonu6...@gmail.comwrote: Question in each section

Re: [algogeeks] Re: ARICENT PATTERN

2012-02-25 Thread vivek kumar
. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:51 AM, vivek kumar kumarvivek1...@gmail.comwrote: thanks bro ... plz tell me no of question in each section -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks

[algogeeks] Re: ARICENT PATTERN

2012-02-21 Thread vivek kumar
is it aspiring minds?? can u tell me the level of resning and apptitude -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

[algogeeks] Re: ARICENT PATTERN

2012-02-21 Thread vivek kumar
thanks bro ... plz tell me no of question in each section -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [algogeeks] [brain teaser ] W Riddle 16 may

2011-05-16 Thread vivek kumar pandey
only one On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Lavesh Rawat lavesh.ra...@gmail.comwrote: *W Riddle * * *** * * ** *George Washington's wife was sweeping when George Washington's wife slipped and got wet. How many w's in all? * *Update Your Answers at* : Click

Re: [algogeeks] Adobe Question

2011-01-04 Thread vivek kumar pandey
maximum sub sequence whose sum is half of the sub sequence length. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM, bittu shashank7andr...@gmail.com wrote: You have a array of 0's and 1's. e.g. 0001011101001010100101010101100111 Find the maximum contiguous subsequence of the above sequence so the number of