Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-18 Thread Anika Jain
hey but 935*2+69 = 1939 and when this is divided by 38 remainder iscoming to be 1..i guess so.. is it ryt? On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 9:55 PM, aditya kumar aditya.kumar130...@gmail.comwrote: i guess if the option is provided it would have been an appropiate question . On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at

[algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread priya ramesh
if a number is divided by 935 remainder is 69. if same no. is divided by 38, what will be the remainder? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread aditya kumar
let the number be 935+69 = 1004 (bcoz divide 1004%935 = 69 ) now 1004 % 38 = 16 ANS On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, priya ramesh love.for.programm...@gmail.com wrote: if a number is divided by 935 remainder is 69. if same no. is divided by 38, what will be the remainder? -- You received

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread abhishek iyer
16 is the answer ??? On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, priya ramesh love.for.programm...@gmail.com wrote: if a number is divided by 935 remainder is 69. if same no. is divided by 38, what will be the remainder? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread priya ramesh
i got the same answer. the ans is supposed to be 29 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread sukran dhawan
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, priya ramesh love.for.programm...@gmail.com wrote: if a number is divided by 935 remainder is 69. if same no. is divided by 38, what will be the remainder? -- answer is 16.t You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread aditya kumar
@priya . i have shown you my method . write your method and we shall discuss it . On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:52 PM, sukran dhawan sukrandha...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, priya ramesh love.for.programm...@gmail.com wrote: if a number is divided by 935 remainder is 69.

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread priya ramesh
i solved it the same way you solved it. Took the same exmpl too :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread Nitin Nizhawan
N = 935*q + 69 N%38 = 31, 16, 1, 24, 9, 32, 17, 2 for { q = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7. } On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:54 PM, aditya kumar aditya.kumar130...@gmail.comwrote: @priya . i have shown you my method . write your method and we shall discuss it . On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:52 PM, sukran

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread Romil .......
People this is not the way to approach this one. This question seems to be unfair. Take the number to be 1939 which also leaves 69 as the remainder when divided by 935 but when it is divided by 38, the remainder is only 1. There is definitely some mistake. Also there doesn't seem to be a

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread Rohit Srivastava
+1 to nitin On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Romil ... vamosro...@gmail.com wrote: People this is not the way to approach this one. This question seems to be unfair. Take the number to be 1939 which also leaves 69 as the remainder when divided by 935 but when it is divided by 38, the

Re: [algogeeks] De shaw ques!

2011-08-17 Thread aditya kumar
i guess if the option is provided it would have been an appropiate question . On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Rohit Srivastava access2ro...@gmail.comwrote: +1 to nitin On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Romil ... vamosro...@gmail.comwrote: People this is not the way to approach this