[algogeeks] Re: Binary Tree Amazon

2011-02-22 Thread bittu
@all why you wants to change the tree structure do you know they don't allow that otherwise it wont be amazon question we can use Array as data Structure vertical sum in that as what jalaj told in case you wants to see working code check out \ http://shashank7s.blogspot.com/2011/02/wap-to-findo

[algogeeks] Re: Binary Tree Amazon

2011-02-22 Thread sourav
My implementation tries to create a doubly linked list, each node of which will hold the value of sum of all nodes in a particular vertical.If there is no requirement for the final output to state vertical number against the sum (and indeed there is no such requirement in the question ), then my ap

[algogeeks] Re: Binary Tree Amazon

2011-02-15 Thread Jammy
hash would be a perfect choice. I make a MinMaxHash class which would keep track of the min and max value of the key.(since in this case we would never remove a key, thus this primitive approach works. Otherwise use treeMap) class MinMaxHash extends HashMap{ private Integer min = Integer.MAX_

[algogeeks] Re: Binary Tree Amazon

2011-02-14 Thread sankalp srivastava
Just a slight addition , you would also like to keep a record for the maximum range of the levels (assuming the function is called as (root , 0)) On Feb 14, 5:25 pm, jalaj jaiswal wrote: > use hash > > take an array verticalsum[]={0}; > > the function will be like this > void vertcal_sum(node *r