@above..
This is what i assume is happening ( apart from inherent compiler
optimization is any)...Let me know if i m wrong..
when s2=name; is done it should call the overloaded equal to
operator..
But, 'name' is not a string object, its basically a char pointer to a
const string test..
Now, for
@lucifer: ok so you are saying that the constructor implicitly creates a
temporary 'string' object to hold this char string which is then assigned
to s2. Does this mean that if a constructor function was not specified
(unlike here where we have a parameterized constructor) this would not work
or
@Arun...
Basically what u have asked boils down to 2 questions...
1. First, this sort of assignment requires single parameterized
constructor ?
Yes ( and No as well in special cases.).
But its not a mandate that the class defines...
There is something called as implicit and explicit
@lucifer: thanks !
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Lucifer sourabhd2...@gmail.com wrote:
@Arun...
Basically what u have asked boils down to 2 questions...
1. First, this sort of assignment requires single parameterized
constructor ?
Yes ( and No as well in special cases.).
But its not a
