CONT1D and D1ONE already defined
When compile with -O2, gcc 4.3.2 tries to inline short functions like
gcd(). Thus the labels CONT1D and D1ONE get redefined.
1) Try gcc 4.0.3.
or 2) use local labels instead. eg.
__asm__ __volatile__ ( movl %1, %%eax;
0: cmpl
Yes SPOJ uses the nasm assembler.
On Jun 18, 7:02 am, saurabh singh saurab...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using standard gcc 4.3.2 and the code does not requires any flag to be
required.I also checked the alias if gcc has been aliased to be used with
some option,but that was not the case.My
It does matter. suppose u write the c code and the compiler generates
assembly level code later u get machine code which runs. here in this
process many optimizations can be employed which are not done by gcc.
So including asm code in ur c code can actually make ur code to run
very fast provided u
@Aditya I have been doing this for sometime now,and it does seem to work
mainly because compiler works at a general level,it knows nothing what your
code is trying to achieve(It does predicts somethings).So if you have
patience enough to write asm codes and u are miser enuf to optimize it you
Yeah terence was rightThat was the case...
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:25 PM, saurabh singh saurab...@gmail.com wrote:
@Aditya I have been doing this for sometime now,and it does seem to work
mainly because compiler works at a general level,it knows nothing what your
code is trying to
What compiler are you using? Version, compile options etc.
--
DK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/Wf2PvNNjTikJ.
To post to this group, send
I am using standard gcc 4.3.2 and the code does not requires any flag to be
required.I also checked the alias if gcc has been aliased to be used with
some option,but that was not the case.My operating system is ubuntu.The
error I get is CONT1D and D1ONE already defined.
I wonder if spoj has a
Spoj uses -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer when it compiles. Could that be it?
Maybe the %1 and %2 don't work with this option. Just a guess...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
