Re: [algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread Rohit J.
On 5/6/11, Malay Bag wrote: > why not (...((9!^9!)!)!)! or so? there should be some limit on number of > operators Indeed. So, in this case answer will be infinity :). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group

Re: [algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread Malay Bag
why not (...((9!^9!)!)!)! or so? there should be some limit on number of operators On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Rohit J. wrote: > I think > (9!^9!)! is the correct answer. > 1/0 is not because to be precise it's not defined. > Lim(x ->0) 1/x is infinity. :) > > Cheers > Rohit > > On 5/6/1

Re: [algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread Rohit J.
I think (9!^9!)! is the correct answer. 1/0 is not because to be precise it's not defined. Lim(x ->0) 1/x is infinity. :) Cheers Rohit On 5/6/11, subramania jeeva wrote: > (9! pow 9! ) ! :) > > > > > > > > Cheers > ~ Jeeva ~ > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:22 PM, sourabh jakhar > wr

Re: [algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread subramania jeeva
(9! pow 9! ) ! :) Cheers ~ Jeeva ~ On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:22 PM, sourabh jakhar wrote: > @manjeet > you are genious go for google > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:09 PM, ps.raghuchan...@gmail.com < > ps.raghuchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> @manjeet ...heheheheheh >> >> >> On

Re: [algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread sourabh jakhar
@manjeet you are genious go for google On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:09 PM, ps.raghuchan...@gmail.com < ps.raghuchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > @manjeet ...heheheheheh > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Manjeet Chayel > wrote: > >> 1/0 >> >> >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:06 PM, sourabh jakhar >> wrote:

[algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread RAghu
What about (9 pow 9) ! On May 6, 4:30 pm, uday kumar wrote: > 9 pow 9. > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Bala wrote: > > 99! > > > Thanks > > Bala > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Lavesh Rawat wrote: > > >>  * > >>  LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE > > >> What is the largest number you can get using

Re: [algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread sourabh jakhar
what about 9!pow9! On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:04 PM, RAghu wrote: > What about (9 pow 9) ! > > On May 6, 4:30 pm, uday kumar wrote: > > 9 pow 9. > > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Bala wrote: > > > 99! > > > > > Thanks > > > Bala > > > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Lavesh Rawat >wrot

Re: [algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread ps.raghuchan...@gmail.com
@manjeet ...heheheheheh On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Manjeet Chayel wrote: > 1/0 > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:06 PM, sourabh jakhar wrote: > >> what about 9!pow9! >> >> >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:04 PM, RAghu wrote: >> >>> What about (9 pow 9) ! >>> >>> On May 6, 4:30 pm, uday kumar wrote

Re: [algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread ps.raghuchan...@gmail.com
I think 9! pow 9! is smaller than (9 pow 9)! On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:06 PM, sourabh jakhar wrote: > what about 9!pow9! > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:04 PM, RAghu wrote: > >> What about (9 pow 9) ! >> >> On May 6, 4:30 pm, uday kumar wrote: >> > 9 pow 9. >> > >> > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:41 P

Re: [algogeeks] Re: LARGEST NUMBER PUZZLE 6 MAY

2011-05-06 Thread Manjeet Chayel
1/0 On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:06 PM, sourabh jakhar wrote: > what about 9!pow9! > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:04 PM, RAghu wrote: > >> What about (9 pow 9) ! >> >> On May 6, 4:30 pm, uday kumar wrote: >> > 9 pow 9. >> > >> > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Bala wrote: >> > > 99! >> > >> > > Th