I do not think you method will get problems unless the string is too long.
But will you use too long string in JavaScript?
Anyway, if you really want to get this done more effeciently, I
suggest you to use predefined *replace* functions of String object.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Adrian
Hum, I may be able to use that replace function. Let me check on it.
The problem now is that I have more than 1000 value on the string, it's very
slow on the iteration (not on the memory). I presume concatenating strings
are slow as usual.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:19 PM, daizi sheng [EMAIL
Yes, but that'll be too complex. I have tried the string.compare and it
works like wonder! Shave off a lot of computing time.
Thanks a lot!
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:37 PM, daizi sheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An alternative method is splitting the big string into pieces and
storing such
On Nov 5, 9:01 am, Adrian Godong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but that'll be too complex. I have tried the string.compare and it
works like wonder! Shave off a lot of computing time.
WTF!?
Using a pipe delimited string and string operations to keep track
of over 1000 values is the simple
OK, I was dumb. Thanks,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Geoffrey Summerhayes [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Nov 5, 9:01 am, Adrian Godong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but that'll be too complex. I have tried the string.compare and it
works like wonder! Shave off a lot of computing time.
