[algogeeks] Re: plz explain if the solution is possible with less than 2n-3 comparisons??

2011-07-14 Thread Nitish Garg
Yes, Sunny mentioned just the right number of comparisons required. Read the tournament method to find the second largest or second smallest number in your case. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To view this discussion on the

[algogeeks] Re: plz explain if the solution is possible with less than 2n-3 comparisons??

2011-07-14 Thread shiv narayan
@sunny iam asking minimum no of comaparisons. On Jul 14, 10:22 am, sunny agrawal wrote: > n+lgn-2 no of comparisions will do > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:19 AM, shiv narayan > wrote: > > > Describe an optimal algorithm to find the second minimum number in an > > array of numbers. What is the

[algogeeks] Re: plz explain if the solution is possible with less than 2n-3 comparisons??

2011-07-13 Thread bittu
@shiv here we go to find 2nd best player in array Tournament tree is a form of min (max) heap which is a complete binary tree. Every external node represents a player and internal node represents winner. In a tournament tree every internal node contains winner and every leaf node contains one play