Re: [algogeeks] nlogn, in-place, iterative mergesort?

2011-08-07 Thread DK
I thought someone would have answered this by now: Please see this paper: http://j.mp/rtNp4W -- DK http://gplus.to/divyekapoor http://twitter.com/divyekapoor http://www.divye.in -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To view this

Re: [algogeeks] nlogn, in-place, iterative mergesort?

2011-08-06 Thread immanuel kingston
Yes. just remove the recursive part using 2 stacks. Thanks, Immanuel On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Nitin Nizhawan nitin.nizha...@gmail.comwrote: does anyone know of any in-place, iterative mergesort algorithm with nlogN worst case complexity? It would be good if it is stable also. TIA

Re: [algogeeks] nlogn, in-place, iterative mergesort?

2011-08-06 Thread Nitin Nizhawan
inplace? On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:27 PM, immanuel kingston kingston.imman...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. just remove the recursive part using 2 stacks. Thanks, Immanuel On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Nitin Nizhawan nitin.nizha...@gmail.comwrote: does anyone know of any in-place,

[algogeeks] nlogn, in-place, iterative mergesort?

2011-08-05 Thread Nitin Nizhawan
does anyone know of any in-place, iterative mergesort algorithm with nlogN worst case complexity? It would be good if it is stable also. TIA Nitin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to