#include cstdio
#define NULL1 (void *)0
#define NULL2 0
int main() {
int* p = NULL1; // void* being assigned to a int*, C++ complains.
int* q = NULL2;
return 0;
}
Veni Vedi Slumber !
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Decipher ankurseth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey I was asked this question
refer to pointer in c chapter 1 for better explanation
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
in c++, The macro NULL is an implementation-defined C++ null pointer
constant([lib.support.types), and it may be 0 or 0L, but not (void*)0
in c, it's (void*)0
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:01 PM, hary rathor harry.rat...@gmail.com wrote:
refer to pointer in c chapter 1 for better explanation
--
null macro is defined as #define NULL (void*)0..is there any
difference in null macro definition in c and c++?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
no difference
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, simran ngxprerna2...@gmail.com wrote:
null macro is defined as #define NULL (void*)0..is there any
difference in null macro definition in c and c++?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks
