Re: [algogeeks] partion of array

2010-05-17 Thread Rohit Saraf
@divya : descending order sorting works. BRILLIANT !! On 5/17/10, divya jain sweetdivya@gmail.com wrote: my algo on the array 1 200 500 2000 sort the array therefore we have now 2000 500 200 1 1st array will have largest element A= {2000} and B={500} sumA=2000 sumB=500 now

Re: [algogeeks] partion of array

2010-05-17 Thread Amir hossein Shahriari
@divya : it's a greedy approach and again it's WRONG! your answer for {110,100,90,70,60,10 } would be: A = { 110, 70, 60 } B = { 100, 90 , 10 } the difference is 40 the correct ans: A = { 110, 100 , 10 } B = { 90 , 70 , 60 } the difference is 0 i don't believe a greedy algorithm would work for

Re: [algogeeks] partion of array

2010-05-17 Thread Rohit Saraf
I was really not able to digest the greedy thing Great example!! On 5/17/10, Amir hossein Shahriari amir.hossein.shahri...@gmail.com wrote: @divya : it's a greedy approach and again it's WRONG! your answer for {110,100,90,70,60,10 } would be: A = { 110, 70, 60 } B = { 100, 90 , 10 } the

Re: [algogeeks] partion of array

2010-05-17 Thread Navin Naidu
I dont think greedy or dp should be the way to approach the problem since it does not show optimal sub-structure property. On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Rohit Saraf rohit.kumar.sa...@gmail.comwrote: I was really not able to digest the greedy thing Great example!! On 5/17/10, Amir

Re: [algogeeks] partion of array

2010-05-15 Thread Anurag Sharma
One more way to do this can be: 1. sorting the number in decreasing order 2. start with 2 empty sets A and B and assign first 2 elements to each of them (see the following example) 3. maintain the sums of A and B in variables. 4. take the next number from list and add it to the set

[algogeeks] partion of array

2010-05-14 Thread divya
Algorithm to partition set of numbers into two s.t. diff bw their sum is min and they hav equal num of elements -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe

Re: [algogeeks] partion of array

2010-05-14 Thread Rohit Saraf
A simple DP should work. Should it not? -- Rohit Saraf Second Year Undergraduate, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering IIT Bombay http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~rohitfeb14 On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Sathaiah Dontula

Re: [algogeeks] partion of array

2010-05-14 Thread sweetdivya.305
yes u can assume even no of elements.. @ rohit please explain ur ans in detail.. thanks in advance :) On 14 May 2010 16:23, Rohit Saraf rohit.kumar.sa...@gmail.com wrote: A simple DP should work. Should it not? -- Rohit Saraf Second Year

Re: [algogeeks] partion of array

2010-05-14 Thread jalaj jaiswal
@rohit ... please elaborate On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Rohit Saraf rohit.kumar.sa...@gmail.comwrote: A simple DP should work. Should it not? -- Rohit Saraf Second Year Undergraduate, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering IIT