Re: [algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-19 Thread Dipankar Patro
@ gopi: I think you are referring to the even number of elements in the list. Anyhow, here is the solution to the odd number of elements. http://ideone.com/5nmzL Now is the problem solved? On 20 August 2011 10:47, *$* wrote: > Hi, > But as per the given problem , that constraint is not specifi

Re: [algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-19 Thread *$*
Hi, But as per the given problem , that constraint is not specified.. thx, --Gopi On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Dipankar Patro wrote: > Fixed the problem. There was a problem with the first element positioning. > > Here is the final solution: > http://ideone.com/XwymV > > ^^ Time complexity

Re: [algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-19 Thread Anushruti Gupta
Hello all I have just joined the group and I am happy that I took this decision..:) However I want to direct all the mails from the group to another id that I made specifically for this group..but it is not showing the email id in the drop down box in the setting ...Please help Cosmexia On

Re: [algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-19 Thread Dipankar Patro
Fixed the problem. There was a problem with the first element positioning. Here is the final solution: http://ideone.com/XwymV ^^ Time complexity - O(2n) Space complexity O(1) :) On 20 August 2011 08:14, Dipankar Patro wrote: > http://ideone.com/ucO4d > > Total no. of elements should be even (

Re: [algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-19 Thread Dipankar Patro
http://ideone.com/ucO4d Total no. of elements should be even (I assume) and it is also failing for some test cases. Working on to zero down to the error in algo. On 20 August 2011 02:11, JAIDEV YADAV wrote: > this was earlier in this group... > Please see this paper: http://j.mp/rtNp4W > > > On

Re: [algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-19 Thread JAIDEV YADAV
this was earlier in this group... Please see this paper: http://j.mp/rtNp4W On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Abhishek Yadav wrote: > Its the same as we do merge sort where we merge the two sorted array into > one which will require an extra array.. > Is there any algorithm for inplace merges

Re: [algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-19 Thread Sanjay Rajpal
@ *$* : would you elaborate more on the problem ? Because when the array will be simply sorted, even then the problem looks to be solved. I think we required something else that is not clear from the statement. *Regards Sanju Happy to Help :)* On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Abhishek Yadav

Re: [algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-19 Thread Abhishek Yadav
Its the same as we do merge sort where we merge the two sorted array into one which will require an extra array.. Is there any algorithm for inplace mergesort...? On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:09 PM, sagar pareek wrote: > Can be done in O(n) time but it will need O(n) space too > > take another

Re: [algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-19 Thread sagar pareek
Can be done in O(n) time but it will need O(n) space too take another array of same length then its code will be for( i=0,j=0,k=n/2+1 ;i<=n/2&&karr[k]) new[j++]=arr[k++]; else new[j++]=arr[i++]; } if(k wrote: > Sort an array of n positive integers containing n/2 sorted integers in >

[algogeeks] query.. amazon question

2011-08-18 Thread *$*
Sort an array of n positive integers containing n/2 sorted integers in first and second-half? in O(n) time complexity .. and space complexity should be constant -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email