10 is the best answer if the condition is number of non-zero digits
should be maximum...
Best Regards
Ashish Goel
Think positive and find fuel in failure
+919985813081
+919966006652
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Gunjan Sharma gunjan.khan...@gmail.comwrote:
10 what about
@Gunjan Sharma:
Why do you think 50 is not an acceptable answer???
You might be thinking last 5 zeroes not representing the number of zeroes
followed..thus you gave an answer as 10 in one of your previous
post...
But as per the problem is exemplified, *if it is the original precise
50 is the answer..
--
//BE COOL// kavi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hi its number of zeros following it or no of 0s immediately after it.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:07 PM, HARISH S.C s.c.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The best answer I can come up with is 9
503000 (or) 90
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM, bittu shashank7andr...@gmail.com wrote:
i don't
10 what about this??
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
i tried so many but the possible answer is 50 as u said
thank u
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Gunjan Sharma gunjan.khan...@gmail.comwrote:
10 what about this??
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post
Can anyone suggest an algorithmic approach?
On Mar 16, 2011 9:08 PM, annarao naidu kataru kataruanna...@gmail.com
wrote:
i tried so many but the possible answer is 50 as u said
thank u
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Gunjan Sharma gunjan.khan...@gmail.com
wrote:
10 what
Does this problem require algorithmic approach, at all
As per the problem statement i think answer can be deciphered manually and
many intelligent people have already given it...
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:15 PM, anand karthik
anandkarthik@gmail.comwrote:
Can anyone suggest an
Possible solutions under given constraints are :
Number :: sum of non-zero digits
90 :: 9
88 :: 16
777000 :: 21
00 :: 24
50 :: 25*
44 :: 24
333000 :: 21
00 :: 16
10 :: 9
50 is the clear choice. No algorithm/code is
correct
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM, bittu shashank7andr...@gmail.com wrote:
i don't think another answer 50 is best answer according to
your constraints
may sum1 else can think but i found its correct
Thanks
Shashank
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
10 matches
Mail list logo
