lang/otp/pull/6963.
>
>
> Le dim. 24 mars 2024 à 01:50, 'Rudolf Manusadzhian' via elixir-lang-core <
> elixir-l...@googlegroups.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi there! Might be a naive question.
>>
>> Why don't we treat all local captures as external? Like at compile time,
ne
> remains very small: https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/6963.
>
>
> Le dim. 24 mars 2024 à 01:50, 'Rudolf Manusadzhian' via elixir-lang-core <
> elixir-l...@googlegroups.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi there! Might be a naive question.
>>
>> Why don't w
21f3b19f8af9d9d63a30618cdafeaa6367883#diff-3a3b83d8acad1d3b6faed87ba471843f4424b22c26c179bf1d86a87a880e8223R74-R93
>
> Even though, as far as I know, recent versions of Erlang
> have optimizations to make sure the overhead of lambdas like this one
> remains very small: https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/6963.
>
>
> Le dim. 2
Hi there! Might be a naive question.
Why don't we treat all local captures as external? Like at compile time, if
it's possible, we could treat */0* as *&__MODULE__.fun/0* and get a
free performance boost, if in the end they behave same.
I was going thought the docs for :telemetry.attach/4
