Indeed. things under GPL 2 (notice the lack of "+"/"or later") can't
adapt/depend on things under GPL 3.
Things under both GPL 2 and its "+"/"or later" version can't
adapt/depend on things under Apache 2.0. However, things under GPL 3 and
its "+"/"or later" version can.
About the upgrade to GNU GPL 3 (or even better: GNU GPL 3+, *if* the
dependencies would allow to), would be that Archweb would be compatible
with the Apache License 2.0 and also with konami.js (which I assume to
be under GNU GPL 3 (only), so we could only upgrade Archweb to GNU GPL
3, not GNU GPL 3
Sorry, I *am* subscribed, I forgot to edit the message in order to
remove that note. :)
Hi all,
I have an issue to report. However, please note that I'm not subscribed
to this mailing list, so I'd recommend you to Cc me when replying.
For a short description of the issue, see:
[[https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1405]].
However, we must also note that Archweb is now newer than the Ar
