Re: [Python-modules-team] python-django_1.8.18-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Tue, 23 May 2017, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > (please cc me on answers) > > On Tue, 23 May 2017, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > please take the version from testing, not a version that never was in the > > archive > > I have been maintaining the 1.8.x LTS version of Django in jessie-backports

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Our list setup is pretty special and I don't think we will ever be able to > > move to something else (and there are not many alternatives. Mailman 3 is > > not

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 03:04:26PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On ഞായര്‍ 14 മെയ് 2017 02:46 വൈകു, Yao Wei wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Are there a discussion list of people working on the issue? I'd like to > > > follow and see if there's any I

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote: Hi, > > I am worried about the status of FusionForge (and thus the development > > workflow > > around Alioth) for Debian. > > > > Recently I had a discussion on #alioth @OFTC asking for the possibility or > >

Re: lists.alioth.debian.org WAS moving away from FusionForge on Alioth

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Mon, 15 May 2017, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > Nice to have: >

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Nice to have: > (snip) > > - Mailinglists > > I've always thought it a bit weird, unfortunate (and possibly a historical > accident) >

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Sun, 14 May 2017, Boyuan Yang wrote: Hi, > I am worried about the status of FusionForge (and thus the development > workflow > around Alioth) for Debian. > > Recently I had a discussion on #alioth @OFTC asking for the possibility or > plan of upgrading alioth.debian.org from Wheezy to

[Bug 1677501] Re: no SSL certificate verify

In fact I have no idea why this is distributed to the distros instead of reporting it to upstream. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677501 Title: no SSL certificate verify To manage

Bug#861792: ITP: lr -- list files, recursively

On Sun, 07 May 2017, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Thu, 04 May 2017, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > > > > > * Package name: lr > > > Version : 0.4 > > > > P

Bug#861792: ITP: lr -- list files, recursively

On Sun, 07 May 2017, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Thu, 04 May 2017, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > > > > > * Package name: lr > > > Version : 0.4 > > > > P

Bug#861792: ITP: lr -- list files, recursively

On Thu, 04 May 2017, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > * Package name: lr > Version : 0.4 > Upstream Author : Leah Neukirchen

Bug#861792: ITP: lr -- list files, recursively

On Thu, 04 May 2017, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > * Package name: lr > Version : 0.4 > Upstream Author : Leah Neukirchen

Bug#860151: keepalived: System loses virtual ip address after each systemd-networkd restart

On Wed, 12 Apr 2017, Vladimir Tiukhtin wrote: > Package: keepalived > Version: 1:1.3.2-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > >* What led up to the situation? > Using systemd-networkd with keepalived I don't think we (Debian) already support systemd-networkd and if systemd-networkd

Accepted icinga2 2.6.3-1 (source amd64 all) into experimental

amd64 all Version: 2.6.3-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Accepted icinga2 2.6.3-1 (source amd64 all) into experimental

amd64 all Version: 2.6.3-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Bug#857905: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#857905: icinga2-common: Default downtimes config for load on locahost noisy and not generic enough

On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> writes: > > >> > >> I'd propose to remove such default in Debian. Or to indicate whether > >> there's a way to not be notified of such downtimes, in the defau

Bug#857905: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#857905: icinga2-common: Default downtimes config for load on locahost noisy and not generic enough

tags 857905 wontfix severity 857905 wishlist thanks On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Olivier Berger wrote: Hi, > Package: icinga2-common > Version: 2.1.1-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I've just installed icinga2 on a system, and wondered why I got some > notifications sent by email

Re: SPAM

On Sun, 05 Mar 2017, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On March 5, 2017 3:08:49 PM EST, Vincent Danjean wrote: > >Le 05/03/2017 à 16:29, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > >> That would be the next step, DMARC, which is SPF plus DKIM plus some > >> extra DNS records. And DMARC then

Accepted icinga2 2.6.2-1~exp1 (source amd64 all) into experimental

amd64 all Version: 2.6.2-1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <alexander.w...@credativ.de> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga

Accepted icinga2 2.6.2-1~exp1 (source amd64 all) into experimental

amd64 all Version: 2.6.2-1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <alexander.w...@credativ.de> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga

Bug#847311: amavisd-new: After the last Debian update Amavis does not read data type float from Mysql DB correctly. All fields are "0".

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Brian May wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes: > > > I don't know. I never use mysql (or any DB, really) with amavisd-new, > > and I have no idea why it would fetch 0 instead of the proper float > > value from mysql, or how to fix it :-( > > Same

Bug#847311: amavisd-new: After the last Debian update Amavis does not read data type float from Mysql DB correctly. All fields are "0".

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Brian May wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes: > > > I don't know. I never use mysql (or any DB, really) with amavisd-new, > > and I have no idea why it would fetch 0 instead of the proper float > > value from mysql, or how to fix it :-( > > Same

Re: manpages.debian.org has been modernized!

On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:20:30PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Would a mirror of the git repository on alioth be sufficient? I had > > planned to set that up, but didn’t get around to it yet. Any help with > > that would be very welcome. > >

Re: manpages.debian.org has been modernized!

On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:20:30PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Would a mirror of the git repository on alioth be sufficient? I had > > planned to set that up, but didn’t get around to it yet. Any help with > > that would be very welcome. > >

Re: Packaging from Git

On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Narcis Garcia wrote: > __ > I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't > masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service > administrator should fix this. > El 06/02/17 a les 10:42, Alexander Wirt ha escrit: >

Re: Packaging from Git

On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Narcis Garcia wrote: > __ > I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't > masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service > administrator should fix this. We don't intend to. Debian is an open Distribution and we believe in being

Bug#853795: dpkg: Unable to disable .buildinfo generation

Package: dpkg Version: 1.18.21 Severity: normal Hi, Ubuntu ppa's (launchpad) do not support .buildinfo files and reject them: Rejected: Unable to identify file icinga2_2.6.1-1~ppa1~trusty1_source.buildinfo (admin) in changes. Further error processing not possible because of a critical

Bug#853795: dpkg: Unable to disable .buildinfo generation

Package: dpkg Version: 1.18.21 Severity: normal Hi, Ubuntu ppa's (launchpad) do not support .buildinfo files and reject them: Rejected: Unable to identify file icinga2_2.6.1-1~ppa1~trusty1_source.buildinfo (admin) in changes. Further error processing not possible because of a critical

Re: Git hosting for code that provides Debian services

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:16:59PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On തിങ്കള്‍ 30 ജനുവരി 2017 07:05 വൈകു, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > > Is the Gitlab software still an "open core" product of Gitlab the > > > company? > > > > > > > git.fosscommunity.in

Re: mysql lookups - messages with score less than 0 are blocked as spam

Hi, > Jozef Matický > wrote: > >/[-- text/plain, encoding 8bit, charset: utf-8, 47 lines --] />//>/Hello, > >/>//>/I have an amavisd-new (currently 2.8.1) with SA (currently 3.4.0) > >/>/running for couple of years now and the same

Re: What is exactly the "canonical URI" for Vcs-{Git,Browser}?

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Roger Shimizu (2017-01-20 14:40:06) > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 在 2017年1月20日星期五 SGT 下午12:45:53，Sebastiaan Couwenberg 写道： > > >> On 01/20/2017 11:56 AM, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > >> > # This

Re: [icinga-users] LinuxMint OS compatibility with Icinga-web/Icinga2-web

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Garrett Pye wrote: > Would like to confirm that the LinuxMint OS is compatible with Icinga-web. > Having multiple issues attempting to download icinga-web via repository and > backports (Jessie) for the dependences. I have Icinga install and so far it > is performing as

Bug#849207: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#849207: Acknowledgement (libmonitoring-livestatus-perl: Outdated packaging)

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > Thanks for pushing your changes to Alioth. I see that the package was > marked for upload to unstable a few days ago, but package doesn't appear > to have been uploaded yet. > > Are you planning to upload before the package

Bug#851269: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#851269: nagios3-doc: Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/nagios3', line 9: all `Format' sections are invalid.

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: nagios3-doc > Version: 3.5.1.dfsg-2.2 > Severity: normal the package is not in debian anymore. Alex

Re: [icinga-users] Unmet dependences Icinga2

On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Garrett Pye wrote: > Not using Debian like I thought. > > Operating System: Linux Mint 18.1 > Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-53-generic > Architecture: x86-64 Linux Mint ot supported by debmon. Alex ___ icinga-users

Bug#830865: for the mailman lists

On Fri, 06 Jan 2017, Russell Coker wrote: > On Friday, 6 January 2017 1:29:02 PM AEDT Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 06 Jan 2017, Russell Coker wrote: > > > We use mailman for some (most? all?) of the Debian lists, it has ways of > > > solving these problems. &g

Bug#830865: for the mailman lists

On Fri, 06 Jan 2017, Russell Coker wrote: > We use mailman for some (most? all?) of the Debian lists, it has ways of > solving these problems. We don't use mailman for any debian lists. Alex

Bug#849915: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#849915: provide hints for migrating from nagios3 packages

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Package: icinga2 > Version: 2.6.0-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Now that nagios3 is being removed[1] from the next stable Debian > release, more people will potentially try to migrate to icinga2 or other > solutions. > > Could you provide any tips in the

Bug#849915: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#849915: provide hints for migrating from nagios3 packages

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Package: icinga2 > Version: 2.6.0-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Now that nagios3 is being removed[1] from the next stable Debian > release, more people will potentially try to migrate to icinga2 or other > solutions. > > Could you provide any tips in the

Bug#849200: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#849200: Bug#849200: nagios-images: Outdated packaging

On Sat, 24 Dec 2016, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12/24/2016 11:31 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Dec 2016, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > > >> On 12/24/2016 12:04 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >>> On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, Jan Wagner wrote: >

Bug#849200: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#849200: Bug#849200: nagios-images: Outdated packaging

On Sat, 24 Dec 2016, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12/24/2016 12:04 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, Jan Wagner wrote: > >> Am 23.12.16 um 15:33 schrieb Bas Couwenberg: > >>> The packaging for nagios-images is outdated as reported by linti

Bug#849200: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#849200: Bug#849200: nagios-images: Outdated packaging

On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, Jan Wagner wrote: > Hi Bas, > > Am 23.12.16 um 15:33 schrieb Bas Couwenberg: > > The packaging for nagios-images is outdated as reported by lintian. An > > ancient Standards-Version is used, and an extra-license-file false > > positive is not addressed. The package also

Bug#848688: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#848688: Bug#848688: 848688 / ftbfs on mips should be RC, no?

On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 2016-12-20 12:07, Holger Levsen wrote: > > shouldnt this bug be severity:serious? Not being able to build on mips* > > is a > > regression, so this is a blocker for getting icinga2 back into testing… > > To get icinga2 back into testing I suggest

Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote: > > @Alexander, @Fredrik, if you don't have time, do you mind if I ask to > > Vincent or Raphael if they can have a look and maybe review the > > package changed that happened since last

Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote: > > @Alexander, @Fredrik, if you don't have time, do you mind if I ask to > > Vincent or Raphael if they can have a look and maybe review the > > package changed that happened since last

Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Hi, > > @Alexander, @Fredrik, if you don't have time, do you mind if I ask to > Vincent or Raphael if they can have a look and maybe review the > package changed that happened since last upload in 2014? I am currently very very busy and won't have

Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Hi, > > @Alexander, @Fredrik, if you don't have time, do you mind if I ask to > Vincent or Raphael if they can have a look and maybe review the > package changed that happened since last upload in 2014? I am currently very very busy and won't have

Re: [icinga-users] Icinga2.6 for Wheezy

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Christian Moreno Moreno wrote: > Hi, > > We would like install the new version of icinga but is only available (via > Packages) for Jessie. Is possible to get one pasckage for Wheezy? In fact it was uploaded a few minutes ago. Alex

Re: [icinga-users] Icinga2.6 for Wheezy

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Christian Moreno Moreno wrote: > Hi, > > We would like install the new version of icinga but is only available (via > Packages) for Jessie. Is possible to get one pasckage for Wheezy? Wheezy packages will follow (but only icinga2 itself). Alex

Accepted icinga2 2.6.0-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.6.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 737-1] roundcube security update

On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 09.12.2016 11:23, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > >> will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5. > > > > As this CVE/DLA is still fresh in my mind, I've gone ahead and uploaded a > > 0.9.5-1~bpo70+1.1 to

Re: fine-grained permissions on alioth git repositories? (aka Debian gitlab)?

On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi, > > did we get anywhere with the gitlab discussion? The PHP packaging group > has grown quite big and I would really appreciate if we can get a > fine-grained permissions on packaging repositories. > > At minimum, there's split between main PHP,

Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

On Sun, 04 Dec 2016, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > Am 04.12.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: > > Am 02.12.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Joseph Herlant: > > > Hi Tobias, > > > > > > Currently the permissions on the pkg-asciidoc group in alioth seems &

Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

On Sun, 04 Dec 2016, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > Am 04.12.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: > > Am 02.12.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Joseph Herlant: > > > Hi Tobias, > > > > > > Currently the permissions on the pkg-asciidoc group in alioth seems &

Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

and wasn't able to figure out why. Only Fredrik Steen and Alexander Wirt have admin access and I'm the only other member. I've not been able to get in touch with them in a while. Maybe you'll have more luck. Maybe we should have this package moved to collab-maint or python maintainers team to make

Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

and wasn't able to figure out why. Only Fredrik Steen and Alexander Wirt have admin access and I'm the only other member. I've not been able to get in touch with them in a while. Maybe you'll have more luck. Maybe we should have this package moved to collab-maint or python maintainers team to make

Accepted keepalived 1:1.3.2-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 22:25:31 +0100 Source: keepalived Binary: keepalived Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:1.3.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Alexande

Accepted nsca-ng 1.5-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:57:17 +0100 Source: nsca-ng Binary: nsca-ng-client nsca-ng-server Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> C

Accepted icinga2 2.5.4-3 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Accepted keepalived 1:1.2.24-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:20:39 +0100 Source: keepalived Binary: keepalived Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:1.2.24-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Alexande

Bug#756479: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#756479: Bug#756479: Bug#756479: nagios-nrpe-server: Ignores dont_blame_nrpe=1

On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Thorsten Eggert wrote: > Hi Alex, > I would call my self an experienced programmer, I also ran into trouble with > this and debugged more time than it's worth... You should not in any kind use this security flawed feature, however: > How can I get the maintainer of this

Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf". > > > Some packages depends on the new --runstatedir option which was added in > > > 2.69-9, > > > before

Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf". > > > Some packages depends on the new --runstatedir option which was added in > > > 2.69-9, > > > before

Bug#835054: [lists.debian.org] Request for new mailing list: debian-devel-indonesian

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Izharul Haq wrote: > Package: lists.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Here are the data you request: > > Name : > debian-devel-indones...@lists.debian.org On checking your request I saw that there is only one seconder. We won't process the request unless there are some

Bug#841831: people.debian.org: provide psql command for UDD users

On Fri, 28 Oct 2016, Eriberto wrote: Moin, > >> I looked in Alioth and I discovered that each DD has a directory in > >> /srv/home/groups/. My problem is solved! > > > > I don't think that is probably unintended fallout from the transition > > of all debian.org users to usergroups. So please do

Bug#841831: people.debian.org: provide psql command for UDD users

On Fri, 28 Oct 2016, Eriberto wrote: Moin, > >> I looked in Alioth and I discovered that each DD has a directory in > >> /srv/home/groups/. My problem is solved! > > > > I don't think that is probably unintended fallout from the transition > > of all debian.org users to usergroups. So please do

Re: [debian-mysql] getting mysql-5.6 out of stretch

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > We have not filed a mass bug report against packages regarding > transitioning to default-mysql-*. Would you like to file it? > I made a Lintian rule that is now in use, but a mass bug filing would > speed things up. Isn't that a little

Re: client-side signature checking of Debian archives (Re: When should we https our mirrors?)

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > Adrian Bunk writes ("Re: client-side signature checking of Debian archives > (Re: When should we https our mirrors?)"): > > snake oil > > snake oil > > The phrase "snake oil" is very insulting. I have asked you several > times to to stop. > > Publicly

Bug#834857: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#834857: nagios-nrpe: please make the build reproducible

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Chris Lamb wrote: > Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > Would you consider applying this patch and uploading? > > > > The package is without a maintainer. > > Not quite sure what this means; should you orphan it, RM it, etc.? :) oh there we

Bug#834857: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#834857: nagios-nrpe: please make the build reproducible

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Chris Lamb wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > > Source: nagios-nrpe > > Version: 2.15-0ubuntu1 > > Tags: patch > > There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 65 days, in which > time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :) > > Would you consider

Bug#838484: [Pkg-nagios-devel] is Icinga legacy?

On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > The Sensu web site claims that their monitoring tool, Sensu, provides > "Monitoring that doesn't suck" and "reuse monitoring checks and plugins > from legacy monitoring tools like Nagios, Icinga, Zabbix, and many more" > > Is Icinga/Icinga2

Bug#838484: [Pkg-nagios-devel] is Icinga legacy?

On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > The Sensu web site claims that their monitoring tool, Sensu, provides > "Monitoring that doesn't suck" and "reuse monitoring checks and plugins > from legacy monitoring tools like Nagios, Icinga, Zabbix, and many more" > > Is Icinga/Icinga2

Accepted icinga2 2.5.4-2 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Bug#836828: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#836828: nagios3-core: Nagios goes down every midnight

On Tue, 06 Sep 2016, Sylvain wrote: > Package: nagios3-core > Version: 3.5.1.dfsg-2+b1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > When Nagios is used with livestatus and downtimes are set, Nagios goes down > every midnight. > > This is a known issue. You can find a bugs reports about it : >

Bug#829046: Status of pagure

On Thu, 01 Sep 2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Thursday, September 01 2016, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > On Mon, 08 Aug 2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > > > Hi, > > *snip* > >> Well, that's it. I think I should be able to finish everything by

Bug#829046: Status of pagure

On Thu, 01 Sep 2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Thursday, September 01 2016, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > On Mon, 08 Aug 2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > > > Hi, > > *snip* > >> Well, that's it. I think I should be able to finish everything by

Bug#829046: Status of pagure

On Mon, 08 Aug 2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: Hi, *snip* > Well, that's it. I think I should be able to finish everything by the > end of the week, and then move to the sponsorship phase :-). Any updates on that package? Alex signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#829046: Status of pagure

On Mon, 08 Aug 2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: Hi, *snip* > Well, that's it. I think I should be able to finish everything by the > end of the week, and then move to the sponsorship phase :-). Any updates on that package? Alex signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Accepted icinga2 2.5.4-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Accepted icinga2 2.5.3-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Accepted icinga2 2.5.1-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <alexander.w...@credativ.de> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga

Re: [icinga-users] Metric graphing with Icinga 2

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> What are others using or have experience with and suggest as the currently > >> most optimal solution? > > > > “most optimal” really depends on your requirements and environment. Can you > > provide more details about yours so others may suggest

Bug#821113: Rethink d-s-a Reply-To to avoid frustrated users and administrivia/off-topic floods

On Sun, 07 Aug 2016, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Don, > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 08:40:27AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 05:16:50PM -0500, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > On Wed, 06 Jul 2016, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:54:00AM

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote: > > > > > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > At this point, I'm dropping work on

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, gustavo panizzo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote: > > > > > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > At this point, I'm dropping work on

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote: > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving to less > > controversial alternative pagure. > > Pagure looks great and I am happy to see that we are finally moving > towards something

Bug#822004: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#822004: nagios3: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch, indep} targets

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Santiago Vila wrote: > tags 822004 + patch > thanks > > I also recommend switching to dh, but in the meantime, the attached > patch should work. We probably will remove nagios3 from debian soon, as it is a dead end. Thanks Alex

Bug#822004: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#822004: nagios3: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch, indep} targets

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Santiago Vila wrote: > tags 822004 + patch > thanks > > I also recommend switching to dh, but in the meantime, the attached > patch should work. We probably will remove nagios3 from debian soon, as it is a dead end. Thanks Alex

Re: [DNG] [Grml] Is grml still alive

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:09:14 +0200, Alexander wrote in message > <20160720120914.gc25...@smithers.snow-crash.org>: > > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:25:39 +0200, Klaus wrote in message > > >

Re: [DNG] [Grml] Is grml still alive

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:25:39 +0200, Klaus wrote in message > <33d1c1ed-16ae-e76a-9086-e770b0d99...@arcor.de>: > > > > > Michael Prokop schrieb am 19.07.2016 um 23:22: > > > * Klaus Fuerstberger [Mon Jul 18, 2016 at 09:41:01AM +0200]: > > > > > >> as

Re: backport questions

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Etienne Dysli-Metref wrote: > Thank you Alex :) > > On 22/07/16 13:16, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >> - Can I push the backport branches to the repositories in [1]? > > The backports team doesn't care about the git, you will have to ask the > > o

Re: backport questions

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Etienne Dysli-Metref wrote: > Hello mentors, > > I would like to backport Shibboleth packages [1] to jessie and wheezy. > > - What branch name should I use? > Documentation for git-buildpackage [2] says "debian/" so that > would yield "debian/jessie-backports-sloppy", but

Accepted keepalived 1:1.2.23-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:12:06 +0200 Source: keepalived Binary: keepalived Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:1.2.23-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Alexande

Bug#830955: keepalived: Segfault - keepalived doesn't work without CONFIG_IP_VS

On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Mathieu Ruellan wrote: > Hi. > > Sorry i havn't any knownledge about keepalived conception. I just observe > that it is a regression (the previous testing package was working fine) and > stacktraces are the sames > > I'm using the debian default kernel. > I have built a

Bug#830955: keepalived: Segfault - keepalived doesn't work without CONFIG_IP_VS

severity 830955 normal merge 830955 544700 thanks On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Mathieu Ruellan wrote: > Package: keepalived > Version: 1.2.20-1 > Severity: critical > Justification: causes serious data loss > > Dear Maintainer, > > Could you please update the keepalived to fix this issue? > > >

Bug#830955: keepalived: Segfault - keepalived doesn't work without CONFIG_IP_VS

severity 830955 normal merge 830955 544700 thanks On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Mathieu Ruellan wrote: > Package: keepalived > Version: 1.2.20-1 > Severity: critical > Justification: causes serious data loss > > Dear Maintainer, > > Could you please update the keepalived to fix this issue? > > >

Re: [Grml] [DNG] Is grml still alive

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:09:14 +0200, Alexander wrote in message > <20160720120914.gc25...@smithers.snow-crash.org>: > > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:25:39 +0200, Klaus wrote in message > > >

Re: [Grml] [DNG] Is grml still alive

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:25:39 +0200, Klaus wrote in message > <33d1c1ed-16ae-e76a-9086-e770b0d99...@arcor.de>: > > > > > Michael Prokop schrieb am 19.07.2016 um 23:22: > > > * Klaus Fuerstberger [Mon Jul 18, 2016 at 09:41:01AM +0200]: > > > > > >> as

Bug#831787: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#831787: icingaweb2-common: please don't unconditionally re-add www-data to icingaweb2 on upgrades

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Hey Alex. > > On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 15:01 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > >-  don't do this at all (since it's be no means sure that www-data > > >    actually needs or should have access to icingaweb2 content

Bug#831787: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#831787: icingaweb2-common: please don't unconditionally re-add www-data to icingaweb2 on upgrades

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Package: icingaweb2-common > Version: git master > Severity: wishlist > Tags: security > > > Hi. > > I've seen that with commit a7f069b24a2da4bd48f60899b252dfb32079edc6 > the user www-data will be readded to the group icingaweb2 > on every

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >