https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
As I summarized in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-c-20-modules-introduce-thin-bmi-and-decls-hash/74755/43,
people are interested in this direction, but it may be too early for us to
implement it. Let's postpone this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71627
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Since there is no meaningful review opinions here, let's continue it in a new
and clean PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75894
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
My impression to the feedbacks is that every one of us loves the direction,
while we may need more agreement on the user interfaces.
To make it easier to review, I split all the user interfaces related part to
following patches. So that the current patch won't affect users.
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall ping~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-15T11:39:20+08:00
New Revision: e55bda06dc2bb1ef11ff4fcc43f90d8bf843f967
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e55bda06dc2bb1ef11ff4fcc43f90d8bf843f967
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e55bda06dc2bb1ef11ff4fcc43f90d8bf843f967.diff
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-15T11:12:52+08:00
New Revision: 9cdb825a4f1bf9e75829d03879620c6144d0b7bc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9cdb825a4f1bf9e75829d03879620c6144d0b7bc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9cdb825a4f1bf9e75829d03879620c6144d0b7bc.diff
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-11T18:24:09+08:00
New Revision: 2ce9a799f950678cef844706ecb55a483d3c225b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ce9a799f950678cef844706ecb55a483d3c225b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ce9a799f950678cef844706ecb55a483d3c225b.diff
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-11T16:47:51+08:00
New Revision: 65b12a8af37ffa390ff45c8215904513eb75659e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65b12a8af37ffa390ff45c8215904513eb75659e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65b12a8af37ffa390ff45c8215904513eb75659e.diff
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-11T14:15:16+08:00
New Revision: 9a46518630869e7fcb495e72378abdbedf68d40d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a46518630869e7fcb495e72378abdbedf68d40d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a46518630869e7fcb495e72378abdbedf68d40d.diff
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-11T14:06:32+08:00
New Revision: 8c334627818437180176b16b1932b2a26372d8ae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8c334627818437180176b16b1932b2a26372d8ae
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8c334627818437180176b16b1932b2a26372d8ae.diff
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-11T10:18:12+08:00
New Revision: 9406ea3fe32e59a7d28de0dcbd0317b4cdfa4c62
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9406ea3fe32e59a7d28de0dcbd0317b4cdfa4c62
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9406ea3fe32e59a7d28de0dcbd0317b4cdfa4c62.diff
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall ping!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-07T16:54:00+08:00
New Revision: b768b393429419d27e3f76518842136bac9d5b25
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b768b393429419d27e3f76518842136bac9d5b25
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b768b393429419d27e3f76518842136bac9d5b25.diff
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74419
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74419
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/72383
It looks incorrect or odd for the BMIs to dependent on the real files. It
prevents we moving the BMIs and the distributed builds. And it looks like
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-04T17:05:27+08:00
New Revision: db3d0e4dfa34e59fab90c0726a6722f82db48462
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db3d0e4dfa34e59fab90c0726a6722f82db48462
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db3d0e4dfa34e59fab90c0726a6722f82db48462.diff
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -129,14 +129,48 @@ static SmallString<32> buildSuspendPrefixStr(CGCoroData
, AwaitKind Kind) {
return Prefix;
}
-static bool memberCallExpressionCanThrow(const Expr *E) {
- if (const auto *CE = dyn_cast(E))
-if (const auto *Proto =
-
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-11-29T11:45:31+08:00
New Revision: 649e8111a95ae0d8814576e9ca74823572ee404b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/649e8111a95ae0d8814576e9ca74823572ee404b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/649e8111a95ae0d8814576e9ca74823572ee404b.diff
@@ -129,14 +129,48 @@ static SmallString<32> buildSuspendPrefixStr(CGCoroData
, AwaitKind Kind) {
return Prefix;
}
-static bool memberCallExpressionCanThrow(const Expr *E) {
- if (const auto *CE = dyn_cast(E))
-if (const auto *Proto =
-
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM with nit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -129,7 +130,14 @@ static SmallString<32> buildSuspendPrefixStr(CGCoroData
, AwaitKind Kind) {
return Prefix;
}
-static bool memberCallExpressionCanThrow(const Expr *E) {
+static bool ResumeExprCanThrow(const CoroutineSuspendExpr ) {
+ const Expr *E = S.getResumeExpr();
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall I created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73483 as the
following patches to reuse built module files. I think that patch should be
necessary since the current patch may waste too many time and space since it
won't reuse the module files across source
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
>From 32010ae7e0a47cd4a70a9401980b32ed1d3e10f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:33:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] [C++20] [Modules] Introduce initial support for
C++20
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> Debug the https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/72783 can prove it.
> Address interval (local from 0x3a9a00 to 0x3aaa00) allocated by allocator
> contains a IdentifierInfo variable (local address:0x3aa190) whose address is
> freed early.
In this case, it looks
@@ -38,9 +39,52 @@ Task coro_create() {
co_return;
}
-// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} ptr @_Z11coro_createv(
+// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} ptr @_ZN9can_throw11coro_createEv(
// CHECK: init.ready:
// CHECK-NEXT: store i1 true, ptr {{.*}}
-// CHECK-NEXT: call void
@@ -129,7 +130,14 @@ static SmallString<32> buildSuspendPrefixStr(CGCoroData
, AwaitKind Kind) {
return Prefix;
}
-static bool memberCallExpressionCanThrow(const Expr *E) {
+static bool ResumeExprCanThrow(const CoroutineSuspendExpr ) {
+ const Expr *E = S.getResumeExpr();
@@ -12,9 +12,10 @@
#include "CGCleanup.h"
#include "CodeGenFunction.h"
-#include "llvm/ADT/ScopeExit.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ExprCXX.h"
#include "clang/AST/StmtCXX.h"
#include "clang/AST/StmtVisitor.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/ScopeExit.h"
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Is
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73073
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> I'm still really hesitant about this direction.
>
> One starting concern: what happens if someone adds an overload, or other
> interesting name resolution to the module? The downstream caller hasn't
> textually changed, but it should be rebuilt because it should be calling
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72956
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72956
>From 05453bc0da214ad69ab94d901c997c61fae86ab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:57:02 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [C++20] [Modules] Introduce a tool
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72956
>From 05453bc0da214ad69ab94d901c997c61fae86ab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:57:02 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [C++20] [Modules] Introduce a tool
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72956
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72956
>From 05453bc0da214ad69ab94d901c997c61fae86ab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:57:02 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [C++20] [Modules] Introduce a tool
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72956
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72956
This patch introduces a tool 'clang-named-modules-querier' and two plugins
'ClangGetUsedFilesFromModulesPlugin' and
'ClangGetDeclsInModulesPlugin' to help the build systems to avoid compilations
in modules.
@@ -7483,7 +7483,6 @@ generation of the other destruction cases, optimizing the
above `foo.destroy` to
}];
}
-
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
nit: unnecessary changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72851
___
@@ -7580,10 +7580,15 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath , Expr *Call,
if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
+ bool checkCoroCall = false;
+ if (const auto *RD =
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM. Please wait for few days in case there are other comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72851
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72851
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM. Please wait for 3~5 days in case @ilya-biryukov has more comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71945
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-11-16T16:05:46+08:00
New Revision: 10ad98dc160497699930f295dcb4c998ef561d2e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10ad98dc160497699930f295dcb4c998ef561d2e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10ad98dc160497699930f295dcb4c998ef561d2e.diff
@@ -7482,3 +7482,54 @@ generation of the other destruction cases, optimizing
the above `foo.destroy` to
}];
}
+
+
+def CoroReturnTypeAndWrapperDoc : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``coro_return_type`` attribute should be marked on a
@@ -7482,3 +7482,54 @@ generation of the other destruction cases, optimizing
the above `foo.destroy` to
}];
}
+
+
+def CoroReturnTypeAndWrapperDoc : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``coro_return_type`` attribute should be marked on a
@@ -300,6 +300,11 @@ Attribute Changes in Clang
to reduce the size of the destroy functions for coroutines which are known to
be destroyed after having reached the final suspend point.
+- Clang now introduced ``[[clang::coro_return_type]]`` and
@@ -7482,3 +7482,54 @@ generation of the other destruction cases, optimizing
the above `foo.destroy` to
}];
}
+
+
+def CoroReturnTypeAndWrapperDoc : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatDecl;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``coro_return_type`` attribute should be marked on a
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
The key point now is the rationale why this change relates to modules. It looks
not good to proceed without understanding this. Otherwise we're playing with a
black box... And the concrete method, ..., well, I guess we had no choice but
debugging it hardly. For example,
@@ -11591,6 +11591,10 @@ def err_conflicting_aligned_options : Error <
def err_coro_invalid_addr_of_label : Error<
"the GNU address of label extension is not allowed in coroutines."
>;
+def err_coroutine_return_type : Error<
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
The intention
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71985
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall ping~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > > > > > Whether we re-use wrapper code or make some new code is an
> > > > > > > implementation detail.
> > > > > > > It does not actually prevent you from taking the two-phase
> > > > > > > approach ( currently , --precompile will be unchanged in action).
> > > > > >
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > > > Whether we re-use wrapper code or make some new code is an
> > > > > implementation detail.
> > > > > It does not actually prevent you from taking the two-phase approach (
> > > > > currently , --precompile will be unchanged in action).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > Whether we re-use wrapper code or make some new code is an implementation
> > > detail.
> > > It does not actually prevent you from taking the two-phase approach (
> > > currently , --precompile will be unchanged in action).
> >
> >
> > It doesn't prevent the
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-11-10T10:58:07+08:00
New Revision: 0e7b30fa821dd4899227aa643030f4e4164f4e56
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e7b30fa821dd4899227aa643030f4e4164f4e56
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e7b30fa821dd4899227aa643030f4e4164f4e56.diff
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> The proposition of the patches here is (in the most common general case) to
> remove the step of generating the ImplementationBMI and to pipeline the
> filtering to the AST consumer that generates the Interface BMI.
Agreed. This is what I want too.
> Whether we re-use
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-11-09T17:44:41+08:00
New Revision: 0f7aaeb3241c3803489a45753190e82dbc7fd5fa
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f7aaeb3241c3803489a45753190e82dbc7fd5fa
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f7aaeb3241c3803489a45753190e82dbc7fd5fa.diff
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > clang++ -std=c++20 foo.cpp -c -fmodule-file=X=some/dir/X.pcm
>
> Hm, according to https://clang.llvm.org/docs/StandardCPlusPlusModules.html
> this can already be achieved with the `-fmodule-output` option (and which I
> was about to try in `build2`). Is there a reason a
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > There are 2 things in the patch. One is to generate the BMI and the object
> > file in one phase (phase here means preprocess, precompile, compile, ...).
>
> This is the main point of the patch - to do this efficiently.
Got it. The we can be more focused.
>
> > But
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Oh, I didn't look into the identifier's system before. I took a while to look
at the patch but I failed to understand it and I failed to find the
relationships between this patch and header units...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71709
@@ -86,19 +87,26 @@ enum { IdentifierInfoAlignment = 8 };
static constexpr int ObjCOrBuiltinIDBits = 16;
/// The "layout" of ObjCOrBuiltinID is:
-/// - The first value (0) represents "not a special identifier".
-/// - The next (NUM_OBJC_KEYWORDS - 1) values represent
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-11-09T15:20:32+08:00
New Revision: 427f13bd724d332681ca5adb2455b7241af7177d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/427f13bd724d332681ca5adb2455b7241af7177d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/427f13bd724d332681ca5adb2455b7241af7177d.diff
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Thanks for reviewing this!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
This is a little bit far from what I imaged.
There are 2 things in the patch. One is to generate the BMI and the object file
in one phase (phase here means preprocess, precompile, compile, ...). Another
is to allow us to generate BMI from a `.cpp` file. (Currently we only do
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
>From 4531d8b95ecaf08e672939a49fa18415851d136e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:11:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Coroutines] Introduce
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
>From 4531d8b95ecaf08e672939a49fa18415851d136e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:11:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Coroutines] Introduce
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > Presumably there should only be one spelling everywhere.
> >
> >
> > Done
>
> Missed a few. ;-)
Sorry and thanks for the detailed comment!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -std=c++20 \
+// RUN: -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -std=c++20 \
+// RUN: -O3 -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -std=c++20 \
+// RUN: -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -std=c++20 \
+// RUN: -O3 -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Let's discuss the higher level problems in Let's discuss the higher level
problems in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-c-20-modules-introduce-thin-bmi-and-decls-hash/74755.
Especially this one is not good to review since we don't support stacked
review now.
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Let's discuss the higher level problems in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-c-20-modules-introduce-thin-bmi-and-decls-hash/74755
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
The term `sparse` makes me wondering its format is not efficiency.. And for the
term `surface`, ..., it may beyond my knowledge, I feel it is odd but I can't
give a concrete reason.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71622
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> It was suggested to avoid "thin" and "fat" terminology (I started using it
> with LTO as a precedent for the terms), but I suppose something more
> descriptive could be selected.
Any suggestions? My english is not good, you know.
> I'll also note that my prior usage was
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@bcardosolopes @apolloww @rjmccall would you like to take a look for the middle
end part?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> There is substantial inconsistency between "coro only destroy when complete"
> and "... when done" throughout the PR (in various forms; e.g. literal
> strings, snake_case, CamelCase, ALL_CAPS as well as file names).
>
> Presumably there should only be one spelling
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71014
>From c69205d54e1a4858211b5bbce69e10bba7063359 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:11:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Coroutines] Introduce
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Sorry for being too hurry here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71031
>From 82173f3556d40fc1c6e106820ad281b928a2c7fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 15:19:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [C++20] [Modules] Don't import function bodies from other
module
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71031
>From 427c1e1960d48e8803e235b4d5beb437ea21c942 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 15:19:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [C++20] [Modules] Don't import function bodies from other
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-11-07T14:13:33+08:00
New Revision: d0c778c882f117182f8a43d0f986cc8c2cfbb688
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d0c778c882f117182f8a43d0f986cc8c2cfbb688
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d0c778c882f117182f8a43d0f986cc8c2cfbb688.diff
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
I'd like to land this change later since the existing behavior violates our
expectations for ABI.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall gentle ping~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69287
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Thanks for reviewing : )
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69287
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69287
>From c841e9cbd9510c401def4d10df6da408ae496180 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 21:54:25 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC] [Serializer] Pack information in serializer
Previously,
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
I'd like to land this in the next week if no objection come in. Since this may
be safe.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69287
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
Thanks for looking into this. LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71134
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
1001 - 1100 of 1620 matches
Mail list logo
