Re: [VOTE] Add providers for Pinecone, OpenAI & Cohere to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 (binding)

Re: [petsc-users] Copying PETSc Objects Across MPI Communicators

You can place it in a parallel Mat (that has rows or columns on only one rank or a subset of ranks) and then MatCreateSubMatrix with all new rows/columns on a different rank or subset of ranks. That said, you usually have a function that assembles the matrix and you can just call that on the

[Vo]:Slides from Robert Duncan

U.S. DoE Advanced Materials Characterization and Nuclear Product Detection for LENR Robert V. Duncan, Ph.D. President’s Distinguished Chair in Physics and Professor of Physics Texas Tech University Washington, DC September 8, 2023

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 13, 2023

1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.2 from 2.7.2rc1

+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences, compared sources. Used it with the helm chart with a few different configs

Re: [petsc-users] FEM Implementation of NS with SUPG Stabilization

Matthew Knepley writes: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:03 PM Jed Brown wrote: > >> I don't see an attachment, but his thesis used conservative variables and >> defined an effective length scale in a way that seemed to assume constant >> shape function gradients. I'm

Re: [petsc-users] FEM Implementation of NS with SUPG Stabilization

I don't see an attachment, but his thesis used conservative variables and defined an effective length scale in a way that seemed to assume constant shape function gradients. I'm not aware of systematic literature comparing the covariant and contravariant length measures on anisotropic meshes,

Re: [petsc-users] FEM Implementation of NS with SUPG Stabilization

Do you want to write a new code using only PETSc or would you be up for collaborating on ceed-fluids, which is a high-performance compressible SUPG solver based on DMPlex with good GPU support? It uses the metric to compute covariant length for stabilization. We have YZƁ shock capturing, though

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.11.0 Released

e.org/docs/helm-chart/1.11.0/release_notes.html Thanks to all the contributors who made this possible. Cheers, Jed

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.11.0 Released

e.org/docs/helm-chart/1.11.0/release_notes.html Thanks to all the contributors who made this possible. Cheers, Jed

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.11.0 based on 1.11.0rc2

Hello all, The vote to release Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.11.0 based on 1.11.0rc2 is now closed. The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1", 2 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes: "+1" Binding votes: - Jed Cunningham - Hussein Awala - Daniel Stan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.11.0 based on 1.11.0rc2

> the `Chart.yaml` file which does not have a license Quirk of helm ultimately. The source tarball does have the license, just the convenience package tarball is missing it - helm processes the file and removes the comment when it packages the chart. It's been this way forever unfortunately.

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.11.0 based on 1.11.0rc2

delines. $ helm gpg verify airflow-1.11.0.tgz gpg: Signature made Sat Sep 30 11:45:11 2023 MDT gpg:using RSA key E1A1E984F55B8F280BD9CBA20BB7163892A2E48E gpg:issuer "jedcunning...@apache.org" gpg: Good signature from "Jed Cunningham " [ulti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.11.0 based on 1.11.0rc1

A bug was found in rc1 that'll necessitate an rc2. I'm canceling this vote and will create 1.11.0rc2 soon.

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.11.0 based on 1.11.0rc1

nes. gpg: Signature made Wed Sep 27 17:24:14 2023 MDT gpg:using RSA key E1A1E984F55B8F280BD9CBA20BB7163892A2E48E gpg:issuer "jedcunning...@apache.org" gpg: Good signature from "Jed Cunningham " [ultim

[dev-platform] Heads-up: unshipping plugin-container in Firefox 119 (Linux/Unix but not Mac or Windows)

r OSes: On macOS we always use a separate .app bundle for child processes to deal with some Mac-specific requirements. On Windows we still use plugin-container.exe for GMP and previously used it for NPAPI plugins; I'm not aware of any plans to change that.) --Jed -- You received this message becau

[Valgrind-users] how to proceed when faced with malloc error

systems, and my memtest86 run passed. Thank you for your suggestions. Jed *valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all --track-origins=yes --track-fds=yes ./btserver* - --19817-- VALGRIND INTERNAL ERROR: Valgrind received a signal 11 (SIGSEGV) - exiting --19817-- si_code=128;  Faulting

Re: [DISCUSS] move from semver to a more "rolling" release cycle for core

Shubham touched on it a bit, but I want to bring providers into the fold a bit as well. I don't think there is enough focus on provider versions. Us maintainers of Airflow have greatly benefited from being able to have breaking provider changes, but I always get the impression the average user

Re: [petsc-users] Orthogonalization of a (sparse) PETSc matrix

Suitesparse includes a sparse QR algorithm. The main issue is that (even with pivoting) the R factor has the same nonzero structure as a Cholesky factor of A^T A, which is generally much denser than a factor of A, and this degraded sparsity impacts Q as well. I wonder if someone would like to

Re: [DISCUSS] Preventing users from misusing _PIP_ADDITIONAL_REQUIREMENTS ?

I also don't like the 10 minute thing. I'd rather we remove it, or display a message like we do sequential executor (we can only do so much, this is as visible as we can make it really), I think in that order?

Re: [VOTE] August 2023 PR of the Month

My vote is for a batch of PRs, not just a single one (which would have been impossible to review if they were all combined) - the refactoring work @eumiro has been doing recently. He's done 69 this month already!

Re: [VOTE] Drop MsSQL as supported backend

+1 binding

[Vo]:ICCF25 book of abstracts and Infinite Energy reports

Book of Abstracts and program: https://iccf25.com/conf-data/iccf-25/files/ICCF25-book-of-abstracts_final.pdf Infinite Energy reports on conference: https://infinite-energy.com/resources/iccf25.html

Re: [Vo]:Anthropocene Institute press release and cold fusion Exploration Grants

Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > > Otherwise there is no point. If it cannot be replicated, it is not > > science. If the researcher wants to cash in on the discovery, that is > > fine. He or she needs to file for a patent before publishing the paper. > > May be you see the point. With 3 months reports

Re: [Vo]:Anthropocene Institute press release and cold fusion Exploration Grants

Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > Jed, I do not object reporting, but these blood suckers like to have > detailed reports...This would be OK for 10x more money... > Everything must be published in enough detail to replicate the experiment. Otherwise there is no point. If it cannot be r

Re: [Vo]:Anthropocene Institute press release and cold fusion Exploration Grants

Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > Not a single experienced researcher will spend more than a few seconds to > read such outraging nonsense as writing progress reports every 3 months for > e.g. 25k $ funding is just a bad joke... > I have given several researchers funding, with no strings attached. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.0 from 2.7.0rc2

+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences, compared sources. Used it with the helm chart with a few different configs

[Vo]:Anthropocene Institute press release and cold fusion Exploration Grants

See: Anthropocene Institute Advances Solid-State Fusion Energy at ICCF-25 https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230817380396/en/ Anthropocene-Institute-Advances-Solid-State-Fusion-Energy-at-ICCF-25 Exploration Grants The Anthropocene Institute is connecting funding sources with researchers

Re: [petsc-users] 32-bit vs 64-bit GPU support

Jacob Faibussowitsch writes: > More generally, it would be interesting to know the breakdown of installed > CUDA versions for users. Unlike compilers etc, I suspect that cluster admins > (and those running on local machines) are much more likely to be updating > their CUDA toolkits to the

Re: [petsc-users] 32-bit vs 64-bit GPU support

Rohan Yadav writes: > With modern GPU sizes, for example A100's with 80GB of memory, a vector of > length 2^31 is not that much memory -- one could conceivably run a CG solve > with local vectors > 2^31. Yeah, each vector would be 8 GB (single precision) or 16 GB (double). You can't store a

Re: [petsc-users] Setting a custom predictor in the generalized-alpha time stepper

Yeah, we'd like the implementation to stay in alpha2.c. There could be a new interface TSAlpha2SetPredictorType (with -ts_alpha2_predictor_type [none,same_velocity,...]) or TSAlpha2SetPredictorFunction. David Kamensky writes: > Hi Jed, > > The current workaround I'm using is ver

Re: [petsc-users] Setting a custom predictor in the generalized-alpha time stepper

writes: > Hi Jed, > > What I'm trying to compute is basically a standard same-velocity or > same-acceleration predictor (although slightly more complicated, since I'm > restricting it to a sub-system). I hadn't looked into > `SNESSetComputeInitialGuess` yet, although one difficult

Re: [petsc-users] Setting a custom predictor in the generalized-alpha time stepper

I think you can use TSGetSNES() and SNESSetComputeInitialGuess() to modify the initial guess for SNES. Would that serve your needs? Is there anything else you can say about how you'd like to compute this initial guess? Is there a paper or something? David Kamensky writes: > Hi, > > My

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org downloads increased by ~14,000

Robin wrote: > >I exclude robot readers after identifying them by various methods. > > Why would you exclude them? Surely allowing access would ensure that > people doing searches would be more likely to find > the site? > Perhaps I should make it clear I am not actually excluding anyone. That

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org downloads increased by ~14,000

Okay, I found 4,697 records associated with an AI project. I filtered those out, bringing the July total down to 23,151. It is still substantially more than the previous month. https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1213

Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

That is very interesting! And sad. I wonder how much truth there is to reports of antigravity? Perhaps we will never know . . .

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org downloads increased by ~14,000

Robin wrote: > >I exclude robot readers after identifying them by various methods. > > Why would you exclude them? Surely allowing access would ensure that > people doing searches would be more likely to find > the site? > I do not want to include them because that would exaggerate the number

[Vo]:LENR-CANR.org downloads increased by ~14,000

Since Jan. 2021, the average number of downloads at LENR-CANR.org per month has been 9,085. It has been trending up recently. In July 2023 it suddenly increased to 27,848, a level it has not reached since Jan. 2017. See: https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1213

Re: [petsc-users] Scalable Solver for Incompressible Flow

; it seems to be related to AL methods ... but requires that the matrix be > symmetric? > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 7:04 PM Jed Brown wrote: > >> See src/snes/tutorials/ex70.c for the code that I think was used for that >> paper. >> >> Alexander Lindsay write

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

I'm also in favor of option a.

Re: [petsc-users] Scalable Solver for Incompressible Flow

f the time derivative is lumped Just thinking > while typing > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM Alexander Lindsay > wrote: > > Returning to Sebastian's question about the correctness of the current LSC > implementation: in the > taxonomy paper that Jed linked t

Re: Allowing providers to load the respective default connections

I like migrate as well.

Re: [petsc-users] [petsc-maint] Monolithic AMG with fieldsplit as smoother

AMG is subtle here. With AMG for systems, you typically feed it elements of the near null space. In the case of (smoothed) aggregation, the coarse space will have a regular block structure with block sizes equal to the number of near-null vectors. You can use pc_fieldsplit options to select

Re: Allowing providers to load the respective default connections

I'm not sure I like sync over upgrade, personally. Everything else discussed sounds good though.

[Vo]:ICCF25 Guidelines for Participants

How to participate virtually: https://iccf25.com/conf-data/iccf-25/files/GUIDELINES%20FOR%20PARTICIPANTS%20virtual.pdf Other guidelines for presentations and poster sessions: https://iccf25.com/downloads

Re: [Vo]:Bill Collis dead

See: https://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/william-collis.html

Re: [petsc-users] Question about using PETSc to generate matrix preconditioners

I think random matrices will produce misleading results. The chance of randomly generating a matrix that resembles an application is effectively zero. I think you'd be better off with some model problems varying parameters that control the physical regime (e.g., shifts to a Laplacian, advection

[Vo]:Bill Collis dead

I regret to announce that Bill Collis died. See a heartfelt tribute here: https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/7003-in-memory-of-dr-william-bill-collis-scientist-and-diplomat/

[DISCUSS] Should we pre-install celery/k8s providers?

ally solve the problem without needing minimum version pinning in core. All that said, I think we should strongly consider not pre-installing the celery and k8s providers as well. Thoughts? Jed

Re: [VOTE] Make (soon coming) dask provider preinstalled

-1 binding (btw Vincent, your vote is binding in this vote ) On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 7:52 AM Beck, Vincent wrote: > -1 (non-binding) > > On 2023-07-21, 5:46 AM, "Michał Modras" LID> wrote: > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Contributing "core" options by providers configuration ?

I don't necessarily mind providers adding options to existing sections, but I can see the appeal and simplicity of enforcing it at the section level. Either way, I think in the case of multiple, it should fail loudly, not just warn.

Re: [Vo]:EVOs, Hutchison, and ancient megalithic tech

MSF wrote: This is one of my favorite subjects. Not Hutchison, but speculation about > how the ancients were able to cut and transport those huge blocks of stone. Conventional techniques, I believe. Long ago I saw a video with a large group of enthusiasts in England. They had a gigantic

Re: [Vo]:No Originality

Terry Blanton wrote: > See Wolfram's book > I think you might like this book – "What Is ChatGPT Doing ... and Why Does > It Work?" by Stephen Wolfram. > Wolfram is a smart cookie. This a good book. Much of it is over my head. I will read it again from the beginning. Perhaps I will understand

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences.

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.3 from 2.6.3rc1

+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences, and compared code to the tag. Used it with the helm chart with a few different config.

Re: [Vo]:No Originality

Quoting the article: The trio [of actors] say leaked information shows that their books were > used to develop the so-called large language models that underpin AI > chatbots. The plaintiffs say that summaries of their work produced by OpenAI’s > ChatGPT prove that it was trained on their

[Vo]:ICCF25 abstracts

Steve Krivit compiled the abstracts into a single document here: https://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2023/ICCF25/ICCF-25-Book-of-Abstracts-2023.07.04.pdf

[Vo]:AI temperature example

I do not think I posted this here. It is pretty funny. There is a parameter called the AI Temperature. The higher the temperature, the more freedom the bot has to select the next letter. It may select a letter that rarely follows. At temperature 0, the next letter is predictable, and the ChatBot

[Vo]:Breakthrough Institute article about cold fusion

This was in the Anthropocene Institute newsletter. Maybe the Anthropocene Institute and the Breakthrough Institute are the same thing? See: The Breakthrough Institute Fusion Runs Hot and ColdHow the academy has gotten cold fusion wrong for over three decades Jonah Messinger

[Vo]:LENR-CANR.org downloads may be trending up

In recent years, average downloads per month were lowest in June 2022, at 6,117. This year, the average per month is 10,412. Perhaps this indicates increased interest in the field? It could be because of the DoE announcements. More people have looked at the News section lately, where the DoE

[Vo]:Cold fusion in Popular Science

Here is an annoying article about cold fusion. I guess any publicity is good publicity, but it is annoying: https://www.popsci.com/science/cold-fusion-low-energy-nuclear-reaction/ "Cold fusion is making a scientific comeback A US agency is funding low-energy nuclear reactions to the tune of $10

Re: [petsc-users] GAMG and Hypre preconditioner

Zisheng Ye via petsc-users writes: > Dear PETSc Team > > We are testing the GPU support in PETSc's KSPSolve, especially for the GAMG > and Hypre preconditioners. We have encountered several issues that we would > like to ask for your suggestions. > > First, we have couple of questions when

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.10.0 Released

e.org/docs/helm-chart/1.10.0/release_notes.html Thanks to all the contributors who made this possible. Thanks, Jed

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.10.0 Released

e.org/docs/helm-chart/1.10.0/release_notes.html Thanks to all the contributors who made this possible. Thanks, Jed

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.10.0 based on 1.10.0rc1

Hello all, The vote to release Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.10.0 based on 1.10.0rc1 is now closed. The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1", 4 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes: "+1" Binding votes: - Jed Cunningham - Jarek Potiuk - Elad Kalif

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.10.0 based on 1.10.0rc1

delines. $ helm gpg verify airflow-1.10.0.tgz gpg: Signature made Fri Jun 23 09:26:49 2023 EDT gpg:using RSA key E1A1E984F55B8F280BD9CBA20BB7163892A2E48E gpg:issuer "jedcunning...@apache.org" gpg: Good signature from "Jed Cunningham " [ulti

Re: [petsc-users] hypre-ILU vs hypre Euclid

It looks like Victor is working on hypre-ILU so it is active. PETSc used to have PILUT support, but it was so buggy/leaky that we removed the interface. Alexander Lindsay writes: > Haha no I am not sure. There are a few other preconditioning options I will > explore before knocking on this

[Vo]:Zhao et al. report excess heat from Pt-H

Here is a new paper: Zhao, H., et al., *Excess heat in a Pd(Pt)-D2O+LiOD reflux open-electrolytic cell*, in *23rd International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science*. 2021: Xiamen, China. https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZhaoHexcessheat.pdf The authors found excess heat from Pt with

Re: [petsc-users] How to efficiently fill in, in parallel, a PETSc matrix from a COO sparse matrix?

Matthew Knepley writes: >> The matrix entries are multiplied by 2, that is, the number of processes >> used to execute the code. >> > > No. This was mostly intended for GPUs, where there is 1 process. If you > want to use multiple MPI processes, then each process can only introduce > some

Re: [petsc-users] How to efficiently fill in, in parallel, a PETSc matrix from a COO sparse matrix?

You should partition the entries so each entry is submitted by only one process. Note that duplicate entries (on the same or different proceses) are summed as you've seen. For example, in finite elements, it's typical to partition the elements and each process submits entries from its elements.

[Vo]:Depressing article about ITER

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/worlds-largest-fusion-project-is-in-big-trouble-new-documents-reveal/ World’s Largest Fusion Project Is in Big Trouble, New Documents Reveal The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is already billions of dollars over budget and

Re: [Vo]:Dr.s Using ChatGPT to Sound More Human(e)

Robin wrote: First, you should ask yourself why they would give a battery a height of > about 30 mm, if the electrodes are only 4.8 to > 5.6 mm in height. > It does seem odd, now that you mention it. There seems to be confusion about "height." This site says: The minimum height of the positive

Re: AIP-56 Extensible user management

Sounds good to me. Hopefully we can make it happen, but we give ourselves an escape hatch :) On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 9:45 AM Beck, Vincent wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Jed, that's something I confess I had not thought > about. It is a valid concern. What I can propose as a comp

Re: [Vo]:Dr.s Using ChatGPT to Sound More Human(e)

There was an incident recently at the National Eating Disorder Association (NEDA) website, in which ChatGPT gave bad advice and was turned off: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eating-disorder-helpline-chatbot-disabled/ Based on my experience setting up the Bot at LENR-CANR.org, I expect some

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.2 from 2.6.2rc2

+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences. Used it with the helm chart with a few different configs

Re: [Vo]:The LENR-CANR ChatGPT is ON LINE!

I think the ChatBot is now working well. If you tried using it before and the answer was not satisfactory, please try again. https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=2988 There are two bots. The top one is good for searching, and the bottom one is good for detailed questions. Now that I have

Re: [Vo]:Dr.s Using ChatGPT to Sound More Human(e)

Yikes! That's creepy. It is an abuse of AI technology. When something new is invented, people tend to use it in all kinds of ways. Later, they realize that some of these uses are inappropriate. For example, they used x-ray to measure people's feet in shoe stores.

Re: [petsc-users] dm_view of high-order geometry/solution

format that would support this, but the format is so bad for parallel IO and time series that I haven't been motivated to extend the PETSc writer. Of course we would welcome contributions. Duan Junming writes: > Dear Jed, > > > Thank you for your help! > > Now I mo

Re: [petsc-users] dm_view of high-order geometry/solution

And here's an MR to do what you want without any code/arg changes. https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/6588 Jed Brown writes: > Duan Junming writes: > >> Dear Jed, >> >> >> Thank you for the suggestion. >> >> When I run tests/e

Re: [petsc-users] dm_view of high-order geometry/solution

Duan Junming writes: > Dear Jed, > > > Thank you for the suggestion. > > When I run tests/ex33.c with > > ./ex33 -dm_plex_simplex 0 -dm_plex_box_faces 1,1 -mesh_transform annulus > -dm_coord_space 0 -dm_coord_petscspace_degree 3 -dm_refine 1 -dm_view > cgns:t

Re: AIP-56 Extensible user management

Overall I'm happy with the proposal. One thing that concerns me though is moving the FAB auth manager into a separate provider. That auth manager will need to be able to hook into the db migration tooling, and we don't expose that to providers or plugins today. So if we do want to move it, we have

Re: [petsc-users] dm_view of high-order geometry/solution

Matthew Knepley writes: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:01 AM Duan Junming wrote: > >> Dear Matt, >> >> Thank you for the reply. I have a more specific question about the >> spectral element example. Do you have any suggestions that how to write >> all the nodes in each cell to .vtu? >> > It is the

Re: [petsc-users] Scalable Solver for Incompressible Flow

Alexander Lindsay writes: > This has been a great discussion to follow. Regarding > >> when time stepping, you have enough mass matrix that cheaper preconditioners >> are good enough > > I'm curious what some algebraic recommendations might be for high Re in > transients. What mesh aspect

Re: [petsc-dev] How to add strangers as MR reviewers?

Probably adding them as guests (or developers) would be the way to go. My guess is it's to cut down on accidental assignments, but these policies always have side-effects. Barry Smith writes: > Is there a way to add people not in some magic inner circle as an MR > reviewer? For example, I

Re: [petsc-dev] Latest Pull breaks the 'test' target

Matthew Knepley writes: > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 6:53 AM Matthew Knepley wrote: > >> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 9:00 PM Jed Brown wrote: >> >>> I use it that way all the time, but I can't reproduce. >>> >>> $ touch src/snes/interface/snes.c >>&g

Re: [petsc-dev] Latest Pull breaks the 'test' target

e.test dependencies work, you'll need to get > Jed to fix the problem. > > > >> On May 23, 2023, at 10:22 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:22 AM Barry Smith > <mailto:bsm...@petsc.dev>> wrote: >>> >>> I

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 19, 2023

+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences.

Re: [Vo]:AI Invited to Bilderberg

I thought for a moment this meant they invited an AI ChatBot to address the Bilderberg meeting. That would be a good article for The Onion. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org ChatBot improved

Robin wrote: > These bots have an API that lets them access wiki, or so they claim. > Try asking for something else that is not on LENR-CANR. I excluded all data outside of LENR-CANR.org. That is an option in the FastChat Bot configuration. This Bot used the word "J'Accuse" as a synonym for

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org ChatBot improved

This is uncanny. CHATBOT 2: BOT: Hello! What can I do for you today? What did Mallove say about the experiment at MIT? BOT: Eugene Mallove accused MIT of publishing fudged experimental findings to support their early condemnation of the work of Pons and Fleischmann. He believed that MIT's

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org ChatBot improved

H L V wrote: > For example, although chatgpt 4 is more accurate than 3, it has lost some > speed. > That is typical of computer programs. You often have to choose between speed and accuracy. When there is a tremendous amount of data, I often run a program to extract summary data, to give a

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org ChatBot improved

The LENR-CANR.org ChatBot has been upgraded to ChatGPT version 4. It seems to work better, with fewer hallucinations. It may be slower. I asked it some of the questions version 3 could not answer. It answered them correctly. It still gets confused. It thought that McKubre made a statement that

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org ChatBot improved

Beware of hallucinations! This is completely wrong: What are the author(s), title and URL of the Pd-B experiments at China Lake? BOT: The author of the paper on Pd-B experiments at China Lake is Miles, M. and B.F. Bush. The title of the paper is "Palladium-Boron Cathodes Produce Excess Power in

Re: [petsc-users] Issues creating DMPlex from higher order mesh generated by gmsh

Matthew Knepley writes: > On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 10:55 AM Vilmer Dahlberg via petsc-users < > petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> >> I'm trying to read a mesh of higher element order, in this example a mesh >> consisting of 10-node tetrahedral elements, from gmsh, into PETSC. But It

[Vo]:LENR-CANR.org ChatBot improved

I replaced all files with text formatted files, and corrected some that were not machine readable. I think the ChatBot performance has improved. It finds URLs more often, and it finds details in the papers. It still misses some details. See this exchange: BOT: Hello! What can I do for you today?

Re: [petsc-users] How to find the map between the high order coordinates of DMPlex and vertex numbering?

Good to hear this works for you. I believe there is still a problem with high order tetrahedral elements (we've been coping with it for months and someone asked last week) and plan to look at it as soon as possible now that my semester finished. Zongze Yang writes: > Hi, Matt, > > The issue

Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex, is there an API to get a list of Boundary points?

Boundary faces are often labeled already on a mesh, but you can use this to set a label for all boundary faces. https://petsc.org/main/manualpages/DMPlex/DMPlexMarkBoundaryFaces/ "Ferrand, Jesus A." writes: > Greetings. > > I terms of dm-plex terminology, I need a list points corresponding to

Re: [petsc-users] issues with VecSetValues in petsc 3.19

Edoardo alinovi writes: > Hello Barry, > > Welcome to the party! Thank you guys for your precious suggestions, they > are really helpful! > > It's been a while since I am messing around and I have tested many > combinations. Schur + selfp is the best preconditioner, it converges within > 5 iters

Re: [Vo]:An Excellent Movie on AI

It turns out I could watch it. It was pretty good. Not much about AI, but thought provoking. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:An Excellent Movie on AI

I wrote: > It looks interesting, but it is fiction. Right? > I mean, of course it is fiction. But how fictitious? Did AI experts contribute? I haven't seen this video. I think I need a Prime Video account to see it. Here is a video about an AI nightmare scenario that was written by experts. It

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >