+1
Side question: is it easy to tell from the version numbers when reindexing
is required?
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 5:48 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 9.12.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 9.12.0 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https:
Also need this.
--- /home/jeff/sid-chroot/transition/tesseract-5.3.4/debian/control
2024-03-19 23:45:47.0 -0700
+++ /home/jeff/leptonica/transition/tesseract-5.3.4/debian/control
2024-10-05 14:30:47.928986783 -0700
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
Package: tesseract-ocr
Architecture: any
Depends: ${s
leptonlib 1.83.1-4 uploaded to unstable. Also did NMU for dependency level
2 (tesseract, jbig2enc, k2pdfopt). Possibly I did the NMU too soon and the
autobuilders will get confused; will find out soon enough.
leptonlib 1.83.1-4 uploaded to unstable. Also did NMU for dependency level
2 (tesseract, jbig2enc, k2pdfopt). Possibly I did the NMU too soon and the
autobuilders will get confused; will find out soon enough.
Hi Sebastian, may I proceed with transition?
Hi Sebastian, may I proceed with transition?
control: tags 1081319 - moreinfo
libleptonica6 has been accepted into experimental, and I am ready to
proceed.
Control: tags - moreinfo
Control: tags - moreinfo
control: tags 1081319 - moreinfo
libleptonica6 has been accepted into experimental, and I am ready to
proceed.
I have filed bugs with patches for the reverse dependencies that need
changes.
Bug numbers are 1081969 1081968 1081970
Currently waiting for leptonica6 to clear the NEW queue and enter
experimental.
I have filed bugs with patches for the reverse dependencies that need
changes.
Bug numbers are 1081969 1081968 1081970
Currently waiting for leptonica6 to clear the NEW queue and enter
experimental.
Source: tesseract
Version: 5.3.4-1.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
Library name is changing from liblept to libleptonica. Transition bug
is 1081319
diff -r -u ../transition.bak/tesseract-5.3.4/debian/rules
tesseract-5.3.4/debian/rules
--- ../transition.bak/tesseract
Package: kylin-scanner
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
Leptonica is changing its library name from liblept to libleptonica.
Transition bug is 1081319.
--- ../transition.bak/kylin-scanner-1.0.0/src/src.pro 2020-09-03
09:38:45.0 +
+++ kylin-scanner-1.0.0/sr
>
>
> \
diff -u -r /transition.bak/jbig2enc-0.29/configure.ac ./configure.ac
--- /transition.bak/jbig2enc-0.29/configure.ac 2017-01-30 17:27:36.0 +
+++ ./configure.ac 2024-09-12 16:39:05.0 +
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
fi],
[libtool_patch_use_rpath=$enable_rpath])
-AC_CHECK_LIB([
Source: jbig2enc
Version: 0.29-2.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
Leptonica API has changed over the years, and we need to make some
small changes as the newer Leptonica enters Debian. The leptonlib
transition bug is 1081319
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
The library name has changed from liblept to libleptonica. So I have now
changed the package name from liblept5 to libleptonica6. This is uploaded
to experimental as leptonlib_1.84.1-3. I am including the revised Ben file
below and attaching the patch for the most complex reverse dependency. All
re
The library name has changed from liblept to libleptonica. So I have now
changed the package name from liblept5 to libleptonica6. This is uploaded
to experimental as leptonlib_1.84.1-3. I am including the revised Ben file
below and attaching the patch for the most complex reverse dependency. All
re
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: lepton...@packages.debian.org, j...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:leptonlib
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Upstream has changed the name of the library.
BEFORE: liblept.so.5
AFTER: libleptonica.so
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: lepton...@packages.debian.org, j...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:leptonlib
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Upstream has changed the name of the library.
BEFORE: liblept.so.5
AFTER: libleptonica.so
My excuse is I'm increasingly bad at reading email. Still using. Still
encouraging.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 9:32 PM Aric Coady wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
> > Of course anyone can vote !
> > Anyone interested in this project can and should vote !
> > If no one does,
+1
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:51 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 9.10.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 9.10.0 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.10.0-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 9.10.0 is bu
+1
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:39 PM Benjamin Trent wrote:
> +1
>
> I tested getting ann-benchmarks updated and it worked just fine. Was also
> able to build locally and run some tests (non-exhaustive) on my M1 macbook.
>
> Hope everyone else has the same success!
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 3:47 AM
+1
On Mon, May 29, 2023, 4:44 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 9.6.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 9.6.0 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.6.0-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 9.6.0 is built wi
Also affected. Downgrading to 2.9 worked.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972790
Title:
Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu
Status in wpa package in Ub
Also affected. Downgrading to 2.9 worked.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972790
Title:
Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu
Status in wpa package in Ubuntu:
Conf
And thank you, Kurt.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 4:10 PM Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> Hi Ellen,
>
> A side note: (I'm pretty sure I've shared this in the past, but I can't
> remember where)
>
> I use libtiff from head for Google. That way...
>
> - can report any troubles right away back to the maintainers
+1
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, 3:50 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 9.4.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 9.4.1 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.4.1-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 9.4.1 is built wi
Yes, I made a mistake with respect to 1.2.2. Upstream's official patch is
here. I am going to attempt a high urgency upload during the next houw with
1.2.2 + this patch. If that fails for any reason, NMU welcome without
delay.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/libwebp/+/4f1839957115fa4713ed74
Yes, I made a mistake with respect to 1.2.2. Upstream's official patch is
here. I am going to attempt a high urgency upload during the next houw with
1.2.2 + this patch. If that fails for any reason, NMU welcome without
delay.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/libwebp/+/4f1839957115fa4713ed74
libwebp 1.2.1-7 has been successfully uploaded to unstable.
Anthony and Iustin, help is very strongly appreciated for the NMUs.
libwebp 1.2.1-7 has been successfully uploaded to unstable.
Anthony and Iustin, help is very strongly appreciated for the NMUs.
# remove the moreinfo tag
tags 1003548 - moreinfo
thanks
Sebastian, may we move forward with ibwebp?
# remove the moreinfo tag
tags 1003548 - moreinfo
thanks
Sebastian, may we move forward with ibwebp?
To make it super clear, here is the updated formal request with updated Ben
file.
===
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello Release Team,
We would like to transition libwebp to a new upstream version 1.2.1-6
To make it super clear, here is the updated formal request with updated Ben
file.
===
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello Release Team,
We would like to transition libwebp to a new upstream version 1.2.1-6
The package has been corrected with version 1.2.1-6 which has
been uploaded to experimental.
Please let us know if we can proceed with the upload to unstable. Also
a binNMU rebuild of reverse dependencies would be required afterwards.
The package has been corrected with version 1.2.1-6 which has
been uploaded to experimental.
Please let us know if we can proceed with the upload to unstable. Also
a binNMU rebuild of reverse dependencies would be required afterwards.
I am looking for a new maintainer for the Debian package libwebp.
It's a great package, widely used, with a terrific upstream.
The current version in Debian is several years old. I have just uploaded
a new release to Experimental; there was a soname bump so I suspect
it will be in the NEW queue fo
+1
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The rc1 vote failed because of a bug fix in JCC that helps with detecting
> the Temurin JDK - available from https://adoptium.net.
> IIUC, the Temurin JDK supercedes AdoptOpenJDK.
>
> Please vote on PyLucene 8.11.0 rc2 instead. These relea
Jeff
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2021-02-20 07:57:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > Jeff Breidenbach writes:
> >
> > > Dear Debian colleagues,
> > >
> > > I'm writing because you maintain a package with a
Jeff
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2021-02-20 07:57:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > Jeff Breidenbach writes:
> >
> > > Dear Debian colleagues,
> > >
> > > I'm writing because you maintain a package with a
Jeff
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2021-02-20 07:57:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > Jeff Breidenbach writes:
> >
> > > Dear Debian colleagues,
> > >
> > > I'm writing because you maintain a package with a
Jeff
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2021-02-20 07:57:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > Jeff Breidenbach writes:
> >
> > > Dear Debian colleagues,
> > >
> > > I'm writing because you maintain a package with a
Maintainer is "less active" but still in good contact with upstream. I was
going to package the latest version several months ago, but there was a
soname bump and transitions were not allowed due to Debian's release cycle.
Happy to work with anyone on updating webp.
+1
+1
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 6:35 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.8.1-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 8.8.1 is built wit
+1
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 6:35 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.8.1-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 8.8.1 is built wit
Dear Debian colleagues,
I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct dependency in
libwebp6. I'm planning to transition it to libweb8. Although I am not
expecting any compatibility trouble, previous transitions have not always
gone smoothly. So I'm sending this email as a heads up, and
Dear Debian colleagues,
I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct dependency in
libwebp6. I'm planning to transition it to libweb8. Although I am not
expecting any compatibility trouble, previous transitions have not always
gone smoothly. So I'm sending this email as a heads up, and
Dear Debian colleagues,
I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct dependency in
libwebp6. I'm planning to transition it to libweb8. Although I am not
expecting any compatibility trouble, previous transitions have not always
gone smoothly. So I'm sending this email as a heads up, and
Dear Debian colleagues,
I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct dependency in
libwebp6. I'm planning to transition it to libweb8. Although I am not
expecting any compatibility trouble, previous transitions have not always
gone smoothly. So I'm sending this email as a heads up, and
Dear Friends,
As I've mentioned in the past, Mail Archive is alive and well in most
respects. The one exceptions is customer support, for which I am
regretfully and woefully behind.
The service is hosted in the United States, and you might have heard
about an upcoming election in this country. Th
Hi Steffen,
I checked and for whatever reason, they simply aren't sending email to
arch...@mail-archive.com. No idea why. If you can help make that happen,
archiving will work again.
While we are talking, I wants folks to know that the Mail Archive itself is
running fine (knock on wood). But I ca
+1
BCC: Stefan Weil since I don't know if he wants his email posted in
bugs.debian.org
Regarding: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949638
Thank you, Peter.
1. The URL for the patch is 404.
2. There may be some subtlety with -march=native, specifically related to
detection of SIMD
BCC: Stefan Weil since I don't know if he wants his email posted in
bugs.debian.org
Regarding: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949638
Thank you, Peter.
1. The URL for the patch is 404.
2. There may be some subtlety with -march=native, specifically related to
detection of SIMD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 19:02:45 +
Source: leptonlib
Architecture: source
Version: 1.79.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach
Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach
Closes: 942062
Changes:
leptonlib (1.79.0
leptonica-progs also?
Hi Derek,
I'm not totally up to speed on the Multi-Arch thing. Is this just changing
a field in the control file? What's the benefit? Any downside?
I saw a similar bug on Debian's bugtracker, that didn't make sense to me.
Happy to be educated.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9
This is done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1816304
Title:
Several issues due to version 4 beta while the final 4.0.0 has been
released
To manage notifications about this bug go t
Tesseract is updated - so done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777388
Title:
Openalpr segfault in libtesseract provided in Bionic
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
This is done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802334
Title:
update tesseract-ocr to 4.0.0 stable
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach
Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach
Description:
leptonica-progs - sample programs for Leptonica image processing library
liblept5 - image processing library
libleptonica-dev - image processing library
Closes: 926313
Changes:
leptonlib (1.78.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+1
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 5:17 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 8.1.1 (rc2) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 8.1.1 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.1.1-rc2/
>
> PyLucene 8.1.1 is built wit
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach
Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach
Description:
leptonica-progs - sample programs for Leptonica image processing library
liblept5 - image processing library
libleptonica-dev - image processing library
Changes:
leptonlib (1.78.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream
>What type of partial match search is supported on mail-archive?
Here's the short and long explanation of search syntax.
https://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html#search
https://www.mail-archive.com/searching.html
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-ar
So far, so good with this transition. Happy 2019 to everyone.
Jeff
>
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@mail-archive.com
https://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/gossip
Hi Janusz,
Tesseract 4 uses tesseract-ocr-deu and tesseract-ocr-script-frak.
Tesseract 3 uses tesseract-ocr-deu-frak
I am worried about confusing users. If we include both sets of language
data in Debian, there will a huge number of choices, and some users
might feel overwhelmed. However, Alexand
Tesseract produces searchable PDF directly. If you really want to use HOCR
as an
intermediate format, you can but you will need external software. There are
a couple
of "hocr2pdf" programs floating around and "OCRMyPDF" does an admirable
job
tying things together. That said, going direct should g
Dear Friends,
The Mail Archive has been running for 20 years. It started
as hobby and grew into a small business 14 years ago.
We have now come full circle. The business will end on
December 31, 2018 and the service will revert to a hobby.
What happened? Well, traffic has steadily declined for ma
+1
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 11:27 PM Marc Jeurissen
wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Marc Jeurissen
>
> [image: cid:image001.png@01D3F728.E95A0620]
>
> Bibliotheek UAntwerpen
> Stadscampus – Ve35.303
> Venusstraat 35 – 2000 Antwerpen
> marc.jeuris...@uantwerpen.be
> T +32 3 265 49 71
> tesseract-ocr package provides arch-independent service (cli)
The command line interface (cli) application 'tesseract' in the
tesseract-ocr package is written in C++. It is not architecture
independent. Therefore I don't think it should be marked as
Multi-Arch: foreign.
test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:47:35 -0700
Source: jhove
Binary: jhove
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.20.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach
Description:
jhove
Thank you very, very much.
https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/jhove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:18:42 -0700
Source: jhove
Binary: jhove
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.20.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach
Description:
jhove
Another possible starting point is this standalone scanner code, if the two
machines
communicate in similar ways. That code doesn't know anything about push
scan or
post imprinting, and the only way I can imagine how to figure that out is
by observing
what an existing (Windows?) driver does. Which
> JCC monkeypatches as needed.
I don't think monkey patching worked on Ubuntu 18.04, for any version of
JCC that I tried. When running make, I ran into errors discussing how JCC
was not built with shared support.
> Does Lucene 4 even build and run with Java 11 ?
No idea. I halted my efforts once
I'd previously been using 4.9.0. Making a huge jump in release numbers is
scary. Will it invalidate existing indexes? Has the Lucene API changed a
lot?
Will I be forced to migrate to python 3? That said, I was desperate and
tried
all the official releases (4.10.1, 6.2.0, 6.4.1, 6.5.0). It just so
h
Hi Andi,
I am happy to report that I just got 4.10.1 working, using some
extreme measures. Whew. Will give a clearer report after getting
some sleep.
Jeff
And for what it is worth, python-setuptools claims to be version 39.0.1.
I've
probably spent about 10 to 12 hours trying to get something to work. It is
not clear to me if it needs patching to not.
To be a little more specific, here's what happens with version 4.9.0
which I've had good luck with in the past. The system contains the
following shared libraries.
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so
It looks
I'm having all sorts of trouble getting PyLucene to run on Ubuntu 18.04,
which has openjdk-8, openjdk-11, python 2.7.15. Has anyone had success,
and if so, with which version of pylucene?
Thanks,
Jeff
I've tried and can't figure out how to make this package either build
at the current release, or update to latest release. This is one last
desperate call for help.
>jhove 1.6+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-05-14
>
>It is affected by these RC bugs:
>895761: jhove: FTBFS with
Believed fixed in Debian package 1.76.0-1
Status of various vulnerabilities, as per upstream:
* CVE-2018-7442: potential injection attack because '/' is allowed
in gplot rootdir.
Functions using this command have been disabled by default in the
distribution,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 12:47:10 -0700
Source: leptonlib
Binary: libleptonica-dev liblept5 leptonica-progs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.76.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach
Changed-By: Jeff
Tesseract in Debian just added a build time smoke test AND Stefan fixed
the big-endian
problem. Should be live tomorrow in Sid. Assuming that works well, Graham
should be
able to re-activate the disabled OCRMyPDF tests. Note that this is Debian
only; Ubuntu
18.04 is out the door so no longer perti
I'd love to actually update to the most recent upstream. The build system
switched
from ant to maven, and I am completely unfamiliar with it. First, I got a
fatal error
about not finding org.sonatype.oss:oss-parent:pom, so I tried deleting that
section
of the pom.xml. Then the build can't find jaco
I'd love to actually update to the most recent upstream. The build system
switched
from ant to maven, and I am completely unfamiliar with it. First, I got a
fatal error
about not finding org.sonatype.oss:oss-parent:pom, so I tried deleting that
section
of the pom.xml. Then the build can't find jaco
I'm the Debian package maintainer for jhove, which is an image validator
and really useful for libraries and other cultural heritage institutions.
It is about to get kicked out due to bug #895761. The right thing to do is
update the jhove to the current upstream version. However, I haven't touched
Given the date, it sounds like we have an emergency situation.
I'm really stuck here. My only known access to a big endian is an emulator
with Wheezy.
http://create.stephan-brumme.com/big-endian/
That's good enough for checking suspicious parts of Leptonica. I tried and
found nothing. But i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 22:40:05 +0200
Source: leptonlib
Binary: libleptonica-dev liblept5 leptonica-progs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.75.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach
Changed-By: Jeff
I think the right thing is to update to the latest jhove release (1.20) but
looks like the build system has changed dramatically. Would love to get a
little help from someone who works with Java packages on a more regular
basis.
I think the right thing is to update to the latest jhove release (1.20) but
looks like the build system has changed dramatically. Would love to get a
little help from someone who works with Java packages on a more regular
basis.
Okay, uploading now. Thanks for all the help!
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <
manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2018-04-23 23:22 GMT+02:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> :
> >
> > This additionally runs the tests,
> > can be disabled with another override_dh_a
Is it sufficient to put Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 11.0.0) in
debian/control and 11 in debian/compat ?
Taking a look
Taking a look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 12:04:13 -0800
Source: leptonlib
Binary: libleptonica-dev liblept5 leptonica-progs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.75.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach
Changed-By: Jeff
1 - 100 of 2165 matches
Mail list logo
