[Bug 2058914] Re: [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-05-29 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Andreas. I don't have the time anymore to work on the SRU anymore for this package so I'm orphaning the work here for Noble. Just in case that someone wants to follow it up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2063359] Re: [FFe] Use of NDEBUG in d/rules for 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 on Noble generates an incompatible ABI

2024-04-26 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Need to convert the issue into an SRU now that Noble is out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063359 Title: [FFe] Use of NDEBUG in d/rules for 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 on Noble generates

[Bug 2063359] Re: [FFe] Use of NDEBUG in 2.3.3 on Noble generates an incompatible ABI

2024-04-24 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The Gazebo simulator running on a Noble container :) ** Attachment added: "Image of Gazebo Harmonic on Noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+bug/2063359/+attachment/5770080/+files/Screenshot%20from%202024-04-24%2018-36-29.png ** Description changed: Version bump for

[Bug 2063359] [NEW] [FFe] Use of NDEBUG in d/rules for 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 on Noble generates an incompatible ABI

2024-04-24 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported: Revision bump for current ogre on Noble  - Tested on PPA with version: ogre-next - 2.3.3+dfsg-6~202404240955~ubuntu24.04.1 https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe/+packages  - MR:

[Bug 2054477] Re: [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-04-23 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The ogre-next update was released and ignition-cmake was removed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ros-catkin/+bug/2063103. I've updated the statuses. All done here. ** Changed in: ogre-next (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: ignition-cmake (Ubuntu)

[Bug 2053254] Re: [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-04-23 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The ignition-common and ignition-physics packages has be removed from Ubuntu in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ros- catkin/+bug/2063103 yesterday. It can be totally omitted totally. I'm going to close the MR and edit the description. ** Summary changed: - [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart

[Bug 2058279] Re: [FFe] Sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2024-04-22 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Utkarsh! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058279 Title: [FFe] Sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2054477] Re: [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-04-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I'm afraid that we are stuck in transitioning https://ubuntu-archive- team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ogre-next because there is a problem with autopkgtest. Sorry for that. I've created a new merge-request to solve the problem

[Bug 2053254] Re: [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-04-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Friendly ping. I've created the three merge request for trying to move this forward and make it easier for reviewers. Let me know what else needs to be done more to help the testing. Thanks! ** Merge proposal linked:

[Bug 2053254] Re: [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-04-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom/+git/urdfdom/+merge/464439 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053254 Title: [FFe] Update

[Bug 2058914] Re: [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-04-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
python-flake8 7.0.0 is no Noble (main repo). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914 Title: [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7 To manage notifications about

[Bug 2058914] Re: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-04-12 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Given that the solution proposed is to ship a custom patch, I'm going to bump this to a FFe to get acceptance of the release-team and also unblock the excuses transition in existing Noble development cycle. * Merge request:

[Bug 2058914] Re: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-04-12 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/python-pytest-flake8/+git/python-pytest-flake8/+merge/464197 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914

[Bug 2060717] Re: colcon-core argument parsing is broken by recent changes to Python 3.11+

2024-04-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
In coordination with Scott, we have raised this to be a FFe since the package is severity damaged as it is now and probably unusable for any use case that is not completely trivial. I've created and linked the merge-request with the bumped version against ubuntu/devel and testing the package. **

[Bug 2060717] Re: colcon-core argument parsing is broken by recent changes to Python 3.11+

2024-04-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ros2-colcon-core/+git/ros2-colcon-core/+merge/464037 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060717 Title:

[Bug 2058914] Re: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-04-02 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> Not sure what would be best, if RM the package or invest time into patching it. Since no action happened last week, my teammate Chris Lalancette patched the existing version to work with current flake8 on noble-proposed 7.0.0. I have updated the upstream PR with the information

[Bug 2053256] Re: [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

2024-03-26 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I think I've answered the feedback in the last 5 commits and the MR is ready: https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+git/lcm/+merge/463155 P.D: Vladimir I added you as a reviewer, I hope it is fine for you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2053256] Re: [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

2024-03-25 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Andres, Vladimir. I'll try to get the merge request ready in the next couple of days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053256 Title: [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble To

[Bug 2058914] Re: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-03-25 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
We (at the Open Robotics Foundation Alliance) are interested in helping with the transition of python-flake8 from noble-proposed to noble and have been monitoring the transition for some weeks. There is an attempt of fixing the code in https://github.com/tholo/pytest-flake8/pull/96 that we can

[Bug 2054477] Re: [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-03-25 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks for the info Andreas! Update: yesterday ignition-rendering was removed from Noble in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition- rendering/+bug/2058851. I'm going to update the description to remove the references to ignition-rendering. ** Changed in: ignition-rendering (Ubuntu)

[Bug 2058279] Re: [FFe] Sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2024-03-22 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Utkarsh! The pcl package does not have autopkgtest itself, but the ros-perception-pcl has a large set of them. I ran them in a noble docker image, seems fine to me (selected output): autopkgtest [19:37:43]: starting date and time: 2024-03-22 19:37:43+0100 autopkgtest [19:37:43]:

[Bug 2033518] Re: spyder 5.4.4+ds-1 autopkgtest fails

2024-03-20 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Upstream fix was merged and released in 5.5.0. Noble is shipping this patch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033518 Title: spyder 5.4.4+ds-1 autopkgtest fails To manage

[Bug 2053254] Re: Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-03-20 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Changelog from existing version on Noble ** Attachment added: "changelog_dart" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dart/+bug/2053254/+attachment/5757532/+files/changelog_dart.txt ** Description changed: Versions bump for the Open Robotics Community packages:  - urdfdom to

[Bug 2053254] Re: Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-03-20 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Description changed: Versions bump for the Open Robotics Community packages:  - urdfdom to 4.0.0-0ubuntu1 +(Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom)  - dart to 6.13.1+ds-0ubuntu2 +https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel

[Bug 2053254] Re: Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-03-20 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The PPA now has the s390x package of dart finally. Answering the issues that Lucas found in the packaging: > And FWIW, we are using git to maintain ubuntu package (using git-ubuntu), bzr > has not been used for packages for a while AFAIK. But if it is easier for you > to provide the packages in

[Bug 2058279] [NEW] [FFe] Sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2024-03-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported: Please sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current noble version 1.13.0+dfsg-4build2: pcl (1.14.0+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium   * Update Files-Excluded to drop zlib sources   * New upstream version 1.14.0+dfsg  

[Bug 2053254] Re: Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-03-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Benjamin. I've been working on Lucas comments during the last week and hope to have ready the changes in this week. Yesterday upstream releases a new version that fixes all the compiler warnings for GCC-13 and I want to include it so we don't need to disable them:

[Bug 2054477] Re: [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-03-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Steve for the approval. > I'm not sure why there's an ignition-cmake task here, please clarify. ignition-cmake are a set of CMake helpers used by the ignition/gazebo family but can also be used alone. One of the helpers is a Find module for ogre-next (also named Ogre2)

[Bug 2054477] Re: Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-03-08 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Description changed: - Version bump for ogre-next to version 2.3.1, well tested by Open + Version bump for ogre-next to version 2.3.3, well tested by Open Robotics under the Gazebo simulator. - * Package PPA: - - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe -

[Bug 2054477] Re: Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-03-08 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed: - Update ogre-next to 2.3.1 for Noble + Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054477 Title: Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble To

Re: sponsoring library transitions

2024-03-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Pierre: On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 11:16 PM Pierre Gruet wrote: > > > > I've been following the time64_t transition and I think that all > > packages have landed unstable and some days have passed since that. Is > > it now a good moment to upload the new versions and start the > transitions?

[Bug 2053256] Re: [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

2024-03-06 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> Regarding how you are providing the package to be sponsored, I personally would prefer a git branch against pkg/ubuntu/devel. For these cases where we go ahead of debian, what I would do is have the first commit on top of pkg/ubuntu/devel be the new upstream version, and then whatever changes

[Bug 2053256] Re: Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

2024-03-06 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Diff of upstream changes from version 1.3.1 to 1.5.0 ** Description changed: Version bump for the lcm package to latest version 1.5.0+repack-0ubuntu1 Package PPA: - - https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/lcm-1.5 - (let me know if you prefer a Bzr branch) +  -

Re: sponsoring library transitions

2024-03-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hi again: On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 6:12 PM Pierre Gruet wrote: > ... dart is currently involved in the 64 bit time_t transition. Have you > seen that Version 6.12.1+dfsg4-13.1~exp1 has been uploaded to > experimental? It will undergo a library transition so we should wait it > is finished. >

[Bug 2054151] Re: New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community)

2024-03-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Now in Noble/Universe. Fix Released. ** Changed in: http-relay (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054151 Title: New http_relay

[Bug 2054151] Re: New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community)

2024-02-29 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
It is now on noble proposed https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/http- relay/2.1.3-1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054151 Title: New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics

[Bug 2054151] Re: New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community)

2024-02-28 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The package has been uploaded in Debian to the NEW queue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054151 Title: New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community) To manage

Re: sponsoring library transitions

2024-02-09 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 6:12 PM Pierre Gruet wrote: > Hi Jose Luis, > > Le 08/02/2024 à 18:24, Jose Luis Rivero a écrit : > > ... dart is currently involved in the 64 bit time_t transition. Have you > seen that Version 6.12.1+dfsg4-13.1~exp1 has been uploaded to > experime

sponsoring library transitions

2024-02-08 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hi all: I have a couple of library transitions ready to review and upload and would need sponsoring to start the transitioning process: - urdfdom https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom - dart https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/dart (salsa CI is over 3 hours) Thanks!

Bug#965945:

2024-02-03 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I've prepared the 1.5 update in a merge-request and can maintain the package. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061300 (needs sponsoring)

Bug#965945:

2024-02-03 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I've prepared the 1.5 update in a merge-request and can maintain the package. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061300 (needs sponsoring)

Bug#1061300: lcm: Update to version 1.5.0

2024-02-03 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Vagrant for the reply and the information. Updating the info about the 1.5 update, the merge-request is ready to review and sponsored: - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lcm/-/merge_requests/1 On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 8:29 PM Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2024-01-22, Jose Luis Riv

Bug#1061300: lcm: Update to version 1.5.0

2024-02-03 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Vagrant for the reply and the information. Updating the info about the 1.5 update, the merge-request is ready to review and sponsored: - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lcm/-/merge_requests/1 On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 8:29 PM Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2024-01-22, Jose Luis Riv

Bug#1061300: lcm: Update to version 1.5.0

2024-01-22 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Source: lcm Version: 1.3.1+repack1-7 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, lcm upstream released the version 1.5.0 on April 2023. It would be great to have it packaged and available on Debian Sid. I canhelp with code changes if the maintainer or the team are willing to sponsor and review them.

Bug#1061300: lcm: Update to version 1.5.0

2024-01-22 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Source: lcm Version: 1.3.1+repack1-7 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, lcm upstream released the version 1.5.0 on April 2023. It would be great to have it packaged and available on Debian Sid. I canhelp with code changes if the maintainer or the team are willing to sponsor and review them.

Bug#890383: ignition-common FTBFS on big endian: UNIT_Util_TEST (Failed)

2023-08-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Resolved long ago. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:31 PM Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > Thanks for the report. I've submitted the bug upstream: > https://bitbucket.org/ignitionrobotics/ign-common/issues/33/sha-test-in-big-endian-machines > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Adrian

Bug#890383: ignition-common FTBFS on big endian: UNIT_Util_TEST (Failed)

2023-08-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The bug was fixed some years ago. Closing. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:31 PM Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > Thanks for the report. I've submitted the bug upstream: > https://bitbucket.org/ignitionrobotics/ign-common/issues/33/sha-test-in-big-endian-machines > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:4

Bug#890383: ignition-common FTBFS on big endian: UNIT_Util_TEST (Failed)

2023-08-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Resolved long ago. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:31 PM Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > Thanks for the report. I've submitted the bug upstream: > https://bitbucket.org/ignitionrobotics/ign-common/issues/33/sha-test-in-big-endian-machines > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Adrian

Bug#890383: ignition-common FTBFS on big endian: UNIT_Util_TEST (Failed)

2023-08-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The bug was fixed some years ago. Closing. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:31 PM Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > Thanks for the report. I've submitted the bug upstream: > https://bitbucket.org/ignitionrobotics/ign-common/issues/33/sha-test-in-big-endian-machines > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:4

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks so much Graham! I was testing the installation and the simulator and seems to work fine. There is a minor inconvenient for users that is trivial to fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition- gazebo/+bug/1969803. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1969803] [NEW] [needs-sponsor] Change Suggests by Recommends for ignition-tools in ignition-gazebo in Jammy

2022-04-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
are unusual. Attached is the debdiff against current version. ** Affects: ignition-gazebo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero) Status: New ** Tags: jammy ** Patch added: "ignition-gazebo_recommends_tools.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-19 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I think I have it. I added more details in the commit to bzr and in the patch description according to DEP-3. In summary: The test is failing due to a problem in ignition-tools version 1.4.1 (coming from Debian). It does not include libignition-tools-backward lib due to a bug in Debian packaging

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-19 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Looking at it now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940 Title: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> We just need a couple of small patches: > - ignition-physics for amd64 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-physics/+bug/1965064 > - ignition-rendering > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+bug/1967888 These open bugs are now fixed. We should be in a

[Bug 1965780] Re: [needs-sponsor] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2022-04-14 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Łukasz: I think we did a good work with versioning and the upload should have gone just fine. In fact, I was able to test Gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 directly from Jammy repositories and works like a charm. It does not conflict anymore with opencv. Thanks so much for the review and upload! --

[Bug 1773811] Re: [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata

2022-04-11 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Changed in: gazebo (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773811 Title: [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata To manage

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Łukasz: Is there anything more I can do to help with these two remaining packages? We have been tested ignition-gazebo simulator on Jammy and it works great. We just need a couple of small patches: - ignition-physics for amd64

[Bug 1967888] Re: Patch to fix unusable ign-rendering on Jammy

2022-04-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Patch added: "ignition-rendering_6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+bug/1967888/+attachment/5577343/+files/ignition-rendering_6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu2.debdiff ** Changed in: ignition-rendering (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) =&

[Bug 1967888] [NEW] [needs-sponsor] Patch to fix unusable ign-rendering on Jammy

2022-04-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Luis Rivero (j-rivero) Status: New ** Tags: jammy ** Description changed: Current version of ign-rendering on Jammy 6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1 lack of some basic linking on ogre-next to make the software really usable, otherwise the loader fails to find the needed ogre2 symbols. On top

[Bug 1965780] Re: [needs-sponsor] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2022-04-04 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed: - Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) + [needs-sponsor] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Bug#1006920: please split out a libtbbmalloc2 package, both in tbb and onetbb

2022-03-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:30:53 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: > > For Ubuntu, I'm going to rename the old libtbb-dev and libtbb-doc packages to > libtbb2-dev and libtbb2-doc, not sure if that's something you also want to do in > Debian, but for the next Ubuntu release we need to ship both versions, or

Bug#1006920: please split out a libtbbmalloc2 package, both in tbb and onetbb

2022-03-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:30:53 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: > > For Ubuntu, I'm going to rename the old libtbb-dev and libtbb-doc packages to > libtbb2-dev and libtbb2-doc, not sure if that's something you also want to do in > Debian, but for the next Ubuntu release we need to ship both versions, or

Bug#1007222: transition: onetbb

2022-03-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 02:30:08 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > I have not tested by myself, but I heard from an archlinux > > developer that this API bump breaks a lot packages. And > > some upstreams decided to disable or drop tbb support as > > a result. I guess we can take similar measures

Bug#1007222: transition: onetbb

2022-03-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 02:30:08 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > I have not tested by myself, but I heard from an archlinux > > developer that this API bump breaks a lot packages. And > > some upstreams decided to disable or drop tbb support as > > a result. I guess we can take similar measures

[Bug 1965780] [NEW] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2022-03-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
to avoid installing ruby.   * Target experimental to test tbb/onetbb transition #1007222 11.10.2 upstream source should be ready for it.  -- Jose Luis Rivero Sat, 19 Mar 2022 19:58:37 + I've tested this new version on Jammy under my PPA (Gazebo is amd64 only): https://launchpad.net/~j

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> keep an eye on the builds and always available to provide patches as needed. I just checked that ignition-gui, ignition-rendering and ignition- sensors have been built just fine in amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el and riscv64. The only remaining problem would be s390x but the issue is the lack of

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> I have sponsored the rendering packages from the other bug. Not sure if I'll have the cycles to sponsor/review the others today. No worries Łukasz. I've been using these last days to check that all pieces are in place and found a weird bug on ignition-physics amd64 (which is a dependency of

[Bug 1965064] Re: ignition-physics testsuite segfaults on amd64 when using flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects

2022-03-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Attached is the debdiff that solves the problem for the amd64 build by filtering out the flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects. The patch also includes a fix for the ppc64 build now that we are at it. Both changes are reflected in the Changelog and tested in my PPA: * amd64

[Bug 1965064] [NEW] ignition-physics testsuite segfaults on amd64 when using flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects

2022-03-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported: Current ignition-physics version 5.1.0+ds1-4 fails on amd64 with segfaults in some of the tests: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/589246385/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-amd64.ignition-physics_5.1.0+ds1-4_BUILDING.txt.gz The situation was unusual since the same version imported from

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-14 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks so much Łukasz for reviews and comment. > why is NEWS excluded from the ingnition-rendering tarball? It's just an URL. Basically I'd normally not repack the tarball and exclude sources unless really necessary (like when for instance upstream ships something bad in the tarball, like

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-04 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy + [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-04 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy + [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1963583] Re: Needs rebuild in Jammy for python3.10

2022-03-03 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Tags added: jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963583 Title: Needs rebuild in Jammy for python3.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-27 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Mathew: Please note that the software is already packaged and can be found in: PPA: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages Bzr: * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-gazebo * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-launch Could we

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-27 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Mathew: Please note that I've already packaged the software and it is ready for review. You can access to via: PPA: * https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages Bzr: * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-rendering *

[Bug 1961319] Re: ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2022-02-22 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Łukasz! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961319 Title: ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1961319] Re: ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2022-02-17 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I think I solved it. Attached is the debdiff with the pacth to d/rules and the bump to d/changelog. I tested it in all the arches in https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next- jammy/+packages (bump there from 0ubuntu2 to 0ubuntu2.1 was nothing but rebuild with all arches enabled

[Bug 1960149] Re: Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-17 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> Okay, the bad news is: it looks like the ogre-next source package FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x. Can you take a look at the build logs and see if this is something that can be fixed with a follow-up upload? Ouk, trivial to fix if I'm not wrong. > I'd recommend a separate bug for that then. Here

[Bug 1961319] [NEW] ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2022-02-17 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
D. Build Ogre without OGRE_USE_SIMD"   | ^ """ The reason is that the configuration leave enabled the OGRE_USE_SIMD for anything but arm*. The logic should be reverted and only enable it on x64. ** Affects: ogre-next (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j-r

[Bug 1960149] Re: Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks for review Łukasz. Fixes and comments inline. With the requested change in the version number, I'm using a different PPA to upload the version since it is lower than the one in jammy-package PPA. New one is: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-jammy > Remark re: the

Bug#997120: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#997120:

2022-02-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 8:32 AM Emmanuel Promayon < emmanuel.proma...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote: > Dear Jose and Andreas, > > On 14/02/2022 17:02, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Am Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:18:47AM +0100 schrieb Jose Luis Rivero: > > You are welcome. This

Bug#997120: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#997120:

2022-02-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 8:32 AM Emmanuel Promayon < emmanuel.proma...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote: > Dear Jose and Andreas, > > On 14/02/2022 17:02, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Am Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:18:47AM +0100 schrieb Jose Luis Rivero: > > You are welcome. This

[Bug 1960940] [NEW] [needs sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero) Status: New ** Tags: jammy ** Description changed: Please include the ignition-gazebo Simulator in Ubuntu Jammy. Ignition Gazebo is the successor of Gazebo and would be a very valuable addition

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Tags removed: needs-packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960260 Title: [needs sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering stack in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Description changed: - Please include the software ignition-rendering in Ubuntu Jammy. It will - require ogre-next to work, in + Please include the ignition rendering stack, composed by three packages + ignition-rendering, ignition-gui and ignition-sensors. + + It will require ogre-next to

[Bug 1960149] Re: Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> I'll look into this in a moment, thank you for preparing the packages in the PPA. Thanks Łukasz. Let me know if I can help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960149 Title: Include

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering stack in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] Include ignition-rendering in Ubuntu Jammy + [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering stack in Ubuntu Jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Bug#997120:

2022-02-13 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello! > > Am Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 10:57:36PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon: > > Thank you very much for this patch, you are absolutely right: your patch > > fixes the problem! > > Possibly it fixes camitk for the current package in Debian. So thanks a > lot in any case. > You are welcome.

Bug#997120:

2022-02-13 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello! > > Am Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 10:57:36PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon: > > Thank you very much for this patch, you are absolutely right: your patch > > fixes the problem! > > Possibly it fixes camitk for the current package in Debian. So thanks a > lot in any case. > You are welcome.

[Bug 1960266] Re: [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable

2022-02-11 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks so much Sebastien! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960266 Title: [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable To

[Bug 1960266] Re: [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable

2022-02-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Sebastien for the comment. I was checking my Debian QA page https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=jriv...@osrfoundation.org and did not check the -proposed pocket, I see now that the packages are there using rmadison (not sure if there is a better dashboard for the check). I'm

[Bug 1960149] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I added packaging in: * 2.2.5 in PPA https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages/+packages (amd64, arm64, armhf). * I've also updated to bzr https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ogre-next ** Description changed: Please include the software ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy.

[Bug 1960266] [NEW] [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported: Hello: I'm the maintainer of Gazebo and all the related dependencies listed her in Debian. There were some transitions affecting Gazebo in the last months, one affecting DART library (a dependency of Gazebo) and another important transition to duplicate the ignition

[Bug 1960149] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960149 Title: [needs-packaging] Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Ja

[Bug 1960260] [NEW] [needs-packaging] Include ignition-rendering in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
for different rendering engines. It offers unified APIs for creating 3D graphics applications. Ignition Rendering is a component in the ignition framework, a set of libraries designed to rapidly develop robot applications. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j

Bug#997120:

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hi. I've been looking into the camitk compilation, I think I have a patch for it. The build is currently failing by trying to find the file CommandLineOptions.ixx.o. Problem is really in the line above where the compiler does not identify the file CommandLineOptions.ixx as a valid c++ file, so

Bug#997120:

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hi. I've been looking into the camitk compilation, I think I have a patch for it. The build is currently failing by trying to find the file CommandLineOptions.ixx.o. Problem is really in the line above where the compiler does not identify the file CommandLineOptions.ixx as a valid c++ file, so

[Bug 1960149] [NEW] Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported: Please include the software ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy. * Package name : ogre-next * Version : 2.2.5 * Upstream Author : https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre-next/blob/master/AUTHORS * URL : https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre-next * License : MIT * Programming Lang: C++ *

Bug#1004435: transition: dart

2022-01-27 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello! I'm the maintainer of dart, we have a new version in experimental that builds on the previous platforms supported, 6.12.1+dfsg4-8. I've run ratt and the expected dependency,

Bug#1004435: transition: dart

2022-01-27 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello! I'm the maintainer of dart, we have a new version in experimental that builds on the previous platforms supported, 6.12.1+dfsg4-8. I've run ratt and the expected dependency,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >