@@ -90,17 +90,9 @@ void InstrumentationRuntimeASanLibsanitizers::Activate() {
if (!process_sp)
return;
- lldb::ModuleSP module_sp = GetRuntimeModuleSP();
-
Breakpoint *breakpoint = ReportRetriever::SetupBreakpoint(
- module_sp, process_sp,
https://github.com/yln updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94794
>From 40fd912a328cd9f7918a9f9c12f8cfd97094fc2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Lettner
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:20:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Use `Address` to setup breakpoint
Use `Address` (instead
@@ -235,18 +234,13 @@ Breakpoint *ReportRetriever::SetupBreakpoint(ModuleSP
module_sp,
if (!symbol->ValueIsAddress() || !symbol->GetAddressRef().IsValid())
return nullptr;
- Target = process_sp->GetTarget();
- addr_t symbol_address =
@@ -90,17 +90,9 @@ void InstrumentationRuntimeASanLibsanitizers::Activate() {
if (!process_sp)
return;
- lldb::ModuleSP module_sp = GetRuntimeModuleSP();
-
Breakpoint *breakpoint = ReportRetriever::SetupBreakpoint(
- module_sp, process_sp,
https://github.com/yln created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94794
Use `Address` (instead of `addr_t`) to setup
breakpoint in `ReportRetriever::SetupBreakpoint`.
This is cleaner and the breakpoint should now
survive re-running of the binary.
rdar://124399066
>From
yln wrote:
@jimingham, thanks for the review and feedback on how to improve the code. Are
you okay with us addressing this in a follow-up?
> do you know why it was done this way?
I don't think we do. I think we just copied what was done in the old ASan
plugin.
> survives rebuilds
I think
https://github.com/yln approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84583
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
