chapuni wrote:
@tstellar @whentojump They will make clang able to build and test clang itself
with MC/DC instrumentation.
I really hope they could be pulled. Thank you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93723
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing li
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
chapuni wrote:
@tru I didn't know this is editable since this was made automatically.
This is not intended for bazel changes, but the `llvm/IR` header change.
I supposed and hope individual cherry-picks (aka rebase) but it'd be okay with
squashed.
Please treat bazel changes as "cosmetic changes
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101629
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/chapuni approved this pull request.
Let me self-approve at first :)
I've checked this functionality with running `check-llvm` on Linux. Note, `%c`
is extremely slowere than non-continuous mode, even if `%c%m8` on 48 cores.
In general, continuous mode tends to emit better sco
chapuni wrote:
The layering violation will break modules builds. I don't agree for us to
release broken headers.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
chapuni wrote:
@ornata I haven't checked modules build (neither c++20 modules nor clang
modules).
Suppose Bazel is a good tool to detect broken dependencies. :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llv
chapuni wrote:
@tru Would it be fine if @MaskRay would approve this? Or Would we wait for
@topperc ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
chapuni wrote:
@MaskRay @topperc Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
chapuni wrote:
@tru Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -2923,22 +2923,47 @@ bool Darwin::isAlignedAllocationUnavailable() const {
return TargetVersion < alignedAllocMinVersion(OS);
}
-static bool sdkSupportsBuiltinModules(const Darwin::DarwinPlatformKind
&TargetPlatform, const std::optional &SDKInfo) {
+static bool sdkSuppor
https://github.com/chapuni approved this pull request.
I wonder we couldn't amend #102335! Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102517
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/chapuni approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102335
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/chapuni updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
>From b5ecfcc22cffdd560dc5b6a050889b6c6deacbdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NAKAMURA Takumi
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:09:41 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [MC/DC][Coverage] Loosen the limit of NumConds from 6
---
https://github.com/chapuni updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
>From b5ecfcc22cffdd560dc5b6a050889b6c6deacbdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NAKAMURA Takumi
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:09:41 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [MC/DC][Coverage] Loosen the limit of NumConds from 6
---
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -1979,6 +2069,9 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
// Track RHS True/False Decision.
const auto DecisionRHS = MCDCBuilder.back();
+MCDCBuilder.ccc(E->getLHS(), DecisionLHS);
+MCDCBuilder.ccc(E->getRHS(), DecisionRHS);
chapuni wrote:
I
@@ -723,7 +737,15 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
if (I == CondIDs.end())
return -1;
else
- return I->second;
+ return I->second.ID;
+ }
+
+ void ccc(const Expr *CondExpr, mcdc::ConditionIDs IDs) {
+auto ID = getCondID(CondExpr);
+if (ID < 0)
+
https://github.com/chapuni commented:
I know I still have a couple of arbitrary names.
They come from my prototype.
* `MCDCCoverageBuilder::cache` -- will be "NextIDs list"
* `MCDCCoverageBuilder ::ccc(Expr, IDs)` -- just updates `cache`.
I will try to dissolve them within a few days.
https://
https://github.com/chapuni updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
>From b5ecfcc22cffdd560dc5b6a050889b6c6deacbdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NAKAMURA Takumi
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:09:41 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [MC/DC][Coverage] Loosen the limit of NumConds from 6
---
https://github.com/chapuni updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
>From b5ecfcc22cffdd560dc5b6a050889b6c6deacbdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NAKAMURA Takumi
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:09:41 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [MC/DC][Coverage] Loosen the limit of NumConds from 6
---
https://github.com/chapuni closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/chapuni reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/chapuni created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73461
Sorry for the delay.
Feel free to correct, rephrase, and revise.
>From 3ebda6d1a89555a142ac04faab36c279353e95ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NAKAMURA Takumi
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 06:04:57 +0900
Subject: [PAT
chapuni wrote:
Oh, this is 1st time pull request to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73461
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
chapuni wrote:
@tru I cannot find instructions for updating the release notes. Where can I see
them?
Do I need to create an issue, or push changes to llvm/llvm-project-release-prs ?
@arsenm @ornata I'd be happy if you would review my notes here in advance of
moving this to elsewhere, even if t
chapuni wrote:
@tru I have created llvm/llvm-project-release-prs#789, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73461
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-b
Author: chapuni
Date: Tue Jan 19 18:28:22 2016
New Revision: 258265
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=258265&view=rev
Log:
[r257732] Mark remote-JIT tests as XFAIL, as well as win32, for targeting
mingw32.
Modified:
llvm/branches/release_38/test/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/remote/cross-
Author: chapuni
Date: Tue Jan 19 18:32:09 2016
New Revision: 258266
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=258266&view=rev
Log:
[r257857] lli: use llvm::utostr() instead of std::to_string().
Modified:
llvm/branches/release_38/tools/lli/lli.cpp
Modified: llvm/branches/release_38/tools/l
Author: chapuni
Date: Tue May 31 19:27:34 2016
New Revision: 271354
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=271354&view=rev
Log:
[r260944] clang-tools-extra/test/Unit/lit.site.cfg.in: Prune on_clone. I guess
it has been unused since r188006.
Modified:
clang-tools-extra/branches/release_
32 matches
Mail list logo
