Cy,
The patch adds 'bool done_outvp', unconditionally sets it to 'true', and then
later has a check for 'if (!done_outvp)'. Since there is no intervening place
where 'done_outvp' could be set to 'false', that check will never succeed and
that branch is unreachable.
Or am I mis-reading
Cy,
The patch adds 'bool done_outvp', unconditionally sets it to 'true', and then
later has a check for 'if (!done_outvp)'. Since there is no intervening place
where 'done_outvp' could be set to 'false', that check will never succeed and
that branch is unreachable.
Or am I mis-reading
-Original Message-
From: John Baldwin
Date: 2022-04-08, Friday at 12:27
To: Ravi Pokala , ,
,
Subject: Re: git: 885db9301ef9 - main - qlnx: Comment out remaining references
to tx_data_bd.
On 4/7/22 6:40 PM, Ravi Pokala wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: on behalf
-Original Message-
From: John Baldwin
Date: 2022-04-08, Friday at 12:27
To: Ravi Pokala , ,
,
Subject: Re: git: 885db9301ef9 - main - qlnx: Comment out remaining references
to tx_data_bd.
On 4/7/22 6:40 PM, Ravi Pokala wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: on behalf
Hi Piotr,
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ SUBDIR.${MK_STATS}+= libstats
> .if ${COMPILER_TYPE} == "clang" && ${MK_CXX} != "no" && \
> (${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "aarch64" || ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "amd64" || \
> ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "arm" ||
Hi Piotr,
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ SUBDIR.${MK_STATS}+= libstats
> .if ${COMPILER_TYPE} == "clang" && ${MK_CXX} != "no" && \
> (${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "aarch64" || ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "amd64" || \
> ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "arm" ||
Requested by: Panasas
Thanks Navdeep! :-)
-Ravi (wearing Panasas hat)
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of Navdeep Parhar
Date: 2019-10-10, Thursday at 16:27
To: , ,
,
Subject: svn commit: r353418 - in stable/10/sys: conf dev/cxgbe
dev/cxgbe/common dev/cxgbe/firmware
Requested by: Panasas
Thanks Navdeep! :-)
-Ravi (wearing Panasas hat)
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of Navdeep Parhar
Date: 2019-10-10, Thursday at 16:27
To: , ,
,
Subject: svn commit: r353418 - in stable/10/sys: conf dev/cxgbe
dev/cxgbe/common dev/cxgbe/firmware
> From: Lyndon Nerenberg
> To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
> Subject: Intel D-2146NT SoC Support (not D-2164NT)
> Message-ID: <42acae514ff06...@orthanc.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Lyndon Nerenberg writes:
>> We're looking a buying a Supermicro system with the
Hi Kib,
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of Konstantin Belousov
Date: 2016-03-29, Tuesday at 01:44
To: , ,
Subject: svn commit: r297374 -
Hi Kib,
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of Konstantin Belousov
Date: 2016-03-29, Tuesday at 01:44
To: , ,
Subject: svn commit: r297374 -
-Original Message-
From: John Baldwin
Date: 2015-11-24, Tuesday at 18:07
To: "freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org"
Cc: Adrian Chadd , Ravi Pokala ,
"freebsd-geom@freebsd.org"
Hi Adrian,
This:
+#ifdef ARGE_DEBUG
+ for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+ if (status & (1 << i)) {
+ sc->intr_stats.count[1 << i]++;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
looks wrong.
If "status" has value 0x0080, then the above will try to increment index 128,
eebsd.org>,
"freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org>, "k...@freebsd.org"
<k...@freebsd.org>, "i...@freebsd.org" <i...@freebsd.org>, "sco...@freebsd.org"
<sco...@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Ravi Pokala
Date: 2015-10-26, Monday at 21:21
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: "freebsd-geom@freebsd.org" ,
"freebsd-s...@freebsd.org" ,
"freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org"
Hi folks,
This is an updated re-send of a message I originally sent about a year ago,
during MeetBSD 2014. A few people expressed interest in person, but no one ever
followed up on the lists. I'm bringing this up again, in the
-Original Message-
From: Scott Long
Date: 2015-10-26, Monday at 20:08
To: Ravi Pokala
Cc: "freebsd-geom@freebsd.org" ,
"freebsd-s...@freebsd.org" ,
"freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org"
-Original Message-
>Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:09:50 -0700
>From: John Baldwin
>To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
>Cc: Dieter BSD , freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: ECC support
>Message-ID: <1492434.22kxskh...@ralph.baldwin.cx>
Hi LN,
You also need to teach `ifconfig' how to toggle this new setting. See
sbin/ifconfig/iflagg.c:lagg_cmds[]
and how the other LACP options are handled. (Thanks to Genesys on #bsdcode
for pointing that out.)
Also, please confirm that you don't need to do any locking to walk the
list or
Hi folks,
At Panasas, we are working with the Intel XL710 40G NIC (aka Fortville),
and we're seeing some performance issues w/ 11-CURRENT (r282653).
Motherboard: Intel S2600KP (aka Kennedy Pass)
CPU: E5-2660 v3 @ 2.6GHz (aka Haswell Xeon)
(1 socket x 10 physical cores x 2 SMT
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 02:28:46 +
From: Pokala, Ravi rpok...@panasas.com
To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org,
freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
Subject: Booting off NVMe using traditional bootstrap?
Message-ID: d1449a6e.1322b6%rpok
Hi folks,
Does anyone know off-hand if it's possible to boot (amd64) off of an NVMe
device using the traditional bootstrap code (i.e. *not* UEFI)?
Thanks,
Ravi
___
freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi Adrian,
So I had a thing that I attached commands to that would funnel down to
the geom layer that did this mirroring/caching/remapping thing, and it
would handle schedule the commands to whatever block(s) on whatever
disk(s) actually represented that particular logical offset. I actually
had
Hi folks,
When you issue a BIO, the requested byte offset (bio_offset) gets
transformed by each layer of the GEOM stack as needed. If the bottom of
the stack is a physical disk, g_disk_start() transforms the final offset
to a device block address (bio_pblkno), which the disk device driver uses
as
I've only done this manually... It isn't too hard, as all the
partitioning schemes are simple offsets, and the stripe should be
regular...
The *partitioning schemes*, yes. But once you start building up more
layers, it gets complicated.
The issue w/ manually mapping, is that you might loose a
Hi folks,
At Panasas, we found it useful to have a trace buffer for each ATA drive
in the system, for gathering information about command sequences and
latency. I implemented that functionality for our old 7-ish ATA driver,
and it works quite well, with fairly low overhead. For example (sorry for
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:52:16 +0100
From: Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl
To: hardw...@freebsd.org
Subject: Differences between disk controllers
Message-ID: 531e3410.5090...@digiware.nl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
Running:
FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r262730
I've
27 matches
Mail list logo