Lars, please could you take a look, and file a bug upstream if you
agree?
For ruby-mysql2 in Jammy, maybe we just need to hint it through or patch
and disable the tests or something, because there's nothing we can
really do to change MySQL's behaviour here, and it's already in the
stable releases
I've verified that this also affects Focal moving from the release
pocket MySQL build (8.0.19-0ubuntu5) to the updates pocket
(8.0.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.3) but with everything else fully up-to-date
against the updates pocket.
I'm not sure what, if anything, we can do about this besides an upstream
Build the reproducer with "gcc -g -o reproducer reproducer.c
-lmysqlclient" after installing build-essential and libmysqlclient-dev.
By default you need to run it with sudo because mysql-server-8.0
configures root (domain socket authenticated) access only. Or give your
user permission to connect
I've written a reproducer, attached. Behaviour changes between
8.0.27-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 and 8.0.28-0ubuntu3. Before, running "SELECT ?
AS a" as a parameterized query, supplying a MYSQL_TYPE_DATETIME using
the MYSQL_TIME struct, then the result was a single row with one field
with a
** Attachment added: "reproducer.c"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1961617/+attachment/5562772/+files/reproducer.c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961617
** Package changed: ruby-mysql2 (Ubuntu) => mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
** Summary changed:
- dep8 test fails against mysql-8.0 8.0.28-0ubuntu3
+ ruby-mysql2 dep8 test fails against mysql-8.0 8.0.28-0ubuntu3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I've gotten quite deep into this and am still working on it.
** Description changed:
- There is a ruby-mysql2 dep8 when run against mysql-8.0 8.0.28-0ubuntu3
- in jammy-proposed but everything else from the Jammy release pocket. It
- doesn't fail when run against the Jammy release pocket on its
the failure:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
jammy/jammy/amd64/r/ruby-mysql2/20220220_133426_11d64@/log.gz
** Affects: ruby-mysql2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Robie Basak (racb)
Status: In Progress
** Tags: update-excuse
--
You received this bug
I was on +1 maintenance this week.
It's been a long time (years) since I last did this. I'm not sure I had
a good feel for what would be useful to work on, so rather than spending
time changing my mind constantly I just focused on what I saw
regardless.
There seem to be a lot of delays waiting
Hi Team,
I've moved ubuntu-helpers to a more correct URL of
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/+git/ubuntu-helpers. This
avoids Launchpad implicitly linking to a non-existent Launchpad project
called "ubuntu-helpers" which had the effect of turning the various
pages on code.launchpad.net
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 05:03:49AM +, Eivind Næss wrote:
> I created a merge request at the following link below. Is there anyone I can
> bug about getting a review and merge into Ubuntu?
Thank you for contributing to Ubuntu!
I have subscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors to the bug for you. This
Adding Seb for comment please.
** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Description changed:
On Ubuntu Server, "apt install collectd" pulls in huge parts of the
X.org stack, which is generally
Adding Seb for comment please.
** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Description changed:
On Ubuntu Server, "apt install collectd" pulls in huge parts of the
X.org stack, which is generally
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu Server, "apt install collectd" pulls in huge parts of the
X.org stack, which is generally undesirable. This was brought up in
#ubuntu-server earlier. Workaround: use --no-install-recommends
This seems to be due to collectd -> libnotify4 -> gnome-shell -> ...
chain.
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu Server, "apt install collectd" pulls in huge parts of the
X.org stack, which is generally undesirable. This was brought up in
#ubuntu-server earlier. Workaround: use --no-install-recommends
This seems to be due to collectd -> libnotify4 -> gnome-shell -> ...
chain.
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu Server, "apt install collectd" pulls in huge parts of the
X.org stack, which is generally undesirable. This was brought up in
#ubuntu-server earlier. Workaround: use --no-install-recommends
This seems to be due to collectd -> libnotify4 -> gnome-shell -> ...
chain.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for monitoring-plugins has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
OK, so if this is the risk, then I think we should consider what
mitigation might be appropriate at least.
There are many desktop environments packaged in Ubuntu, and some of them
may regress. I'm not sure it's practical to test them all, especially if
you don't have the hardware that might
OK, so if this is the risk, then I think we should consider what
mitigation might be appropriate at least.
There are many desktop environments packaged in Ubuntu, and some of them
may regress. I'm not sure it's practical to test them all, especially if
you don't have the hardware that might
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gtk+3.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/3.24.20-0ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gtk+3.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/3.24.20-0ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Thank you for looking after your package in Ubuntu! Please do keep
contacting us in #ubuntu-devel on Libera if you need anything, and we'll
try to unblock you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Not to contradict anything said above, I'm just tagging regression-
update while leaving this bug Won't Fix for record keeping purposes.
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
OK thanks. I'll consult with others on the SRU team on this - I've added
it to our meeting agenda. If it's decided that this is OK then I'll make
sure it's documented to avoid holding you up on it again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
OK thanks. I'll consult with others on the SRU team on this - I've added
it to our meeting agenda. If it's decided that this is OK then I'll make
sure it's documented to avoid holding you up on it again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Dear Backporters Team,
Thank you for your work in restoring the team and a functional process,
and congratulations on your recent announcement on the reopening of the
backports pocket.
There is one thing I'd like to wrap up relating to the reboot please. In
my email that kicked this off
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cinder into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinder/2:16.4.2-0ubuntu2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Corey, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cinder into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinder/2:16.4.2-0ubuntu2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rsync into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/3.1.2-2.1ubuntu1.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rsync into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/3.1.3-8ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rsync into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/3.1.2-2.1ubuntu1.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rsync into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/3.1.3-8ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+git/rsync/+merge/415253
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528921
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+git/rsync/+merge/415253
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528921
Title:
rsync hangs on
Upstream 3.2.0 includes the identified upstream fix and Jammy has
3.2.3-8ubuntu2 so this is Fix Released for the development release.
Impish is also > 3.2.0 so only Focal and older are affected.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug
Upstream 3.2.0 includes the identified upstream fix and Jammy has
3.2.3-8ubuntu2 so this is Fix Released for the development release.
Impish is also > 3.2.0 so only Focal and older are affected.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug
Is there a risk here that on other desktop environments on Ubuntu, there
will be a duplicate event that will not be debounced, and therefore
regress users? I'm not sure if this is what you're already stating in
"Where problems could occur". If this is a risk, then could you include
it in your Test
Is there a risk here that on other desktop environments on Ubuntu, there
will be a duplicate event that will not be debounced, and therefore
regress users? I'm not sure if this is what you're already stating in
"Where problems could occur". If this is a risk, then could you include
it in your Test
Thank you for the detailed SRU information! You anticipated most of the
obvious questions and saved us a bunch of round trips.
> Should someone do an upgrade to impish, we've confirmed that the
upgrade is resolvable and that they'll just be left with a more recent
version of LXC than that in the
Thank you for the detailed SRU information! You anticipated most of the
obvious questions and saved us a bunch of round trips.
> Should someone do an upgrade to impish, we've confirmed that the
upgrade is resolvable and that they'll just be left with a more recent
version of LXC than that in the
> Oh good point Robie, I hadn't considered that uvtool is Arch: all.
And apologies from me - I had missed that you were requesting an only-
on-arm64 dependency! :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
> qemu-system-arm doesn't strictly need qemu-efi-aarch64 - you can boot
instances w/o UEFI firmware - so it only Recommends it in focal
(promoted from just a Suggests in bionic). However, uvt-kvm explicitly
references /usr/share/AAVMF/AAVMF_CODE.fd in its arm64 libvirt template,
so it seems like
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 08:10:58AM -0500, Daniel Streetman wrote:
> Personally, I think this issue isn't really about when or if we hold
> an election for empty seats - I think this issue is about if a single
> DMB member can prevent the board from following its written policies
> due to
Thank you Thomas for stepping in to mediate in the meeting and for your
time in writing this up.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 12:34:07PM -0500, Thomas Ward wrote:
> Robie Basak is against any action until both aforementioned individuals have
> had a chance to respond before we remove them. He i
Fixed in 8.0.28-0ubuntu1 now in jammy-proposed.
** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945956
Title:
mysql-8.0:
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.6~16.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.6~18.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.6~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.6~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
A couple of thoughts for consideration, but not a blocker for this
upload:
1. Now that the logs are 0644, it'd be nice if the postinst didn't force
override them every time, but only when upgrading from an older version.
That'd allow users to be able to make local changes if they want without
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:48:21AM +, Jürgen Depicker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder whether someone might be able to disable DKIM for lists.ubuntu.com,
> or add the correct public key to DNS for DKIM to work? It seems DKIM is
> switched on, but not configured properly. All your mails now
The following subscriptions are superfluous:
autofs5
backports.functools-lru-cache
billiard
cgmanager
dh-php
ec2-ami-tools
ec2-api-tools
euca2ools
golang
golang-1.6
golang-1.6-race-detector-runtime
golang-check.v1
golang-context
golang-dbus
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:22:32AM -0800, Simon Chopin wrote:
> > Just to add to this, when we do have patches ready, what should be our
> > process to get any security-sensitive backport patches reviewed - in the
> > cases that we're introducing them ahead of an upstream release - to
> > avoid
Hi Frank,
These are now in progress and should appear when done.
Robie
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 05:00:22PM +0100, Frank Heimes wrote:
> Hello,
> would you please import "smc-tools" and "libica" for the use with
> "git-ubuntu" - thanks you !
>
> $ git-ubuntu clone smc-tools
> fatal: could not
Public bug reported:
This can probably be a sync.
Changes since 5.5.10:
whois (5.5.11) unstable; urgency=medium
* Implemented a --no-recursion command line option to disable recursion
from registrar to registry servers.
* Updated the .pro, .vu and .xxx TLD servers.
* Updated the list
I've discussed this further with Julian and he will re-reproduce the
issue locally to answer some of my questions, and then we'll work on the
User Impact and Test Plan from there.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification
It was noted in ubuntu-devel-discuss@ that changing the compression
method impacts Xen's use of pygrub. I thought that was worth mentioning
in this thread as something worth considering when making any decision.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2022-January/019165.html
I've linked the MP and subscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors.
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~macg3/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+git/gdebi/+merge/414211
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdebi in
I've linked the MP and subscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors.
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~macg3/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+git/gdebi/+merge/414211
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:53:48AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> While mysql-8.0 itself won't enter testing, the version in unstable is
> as well only from february 2021, lacking behind several updates for
> fixes in the Oracle CPUs.
>
> Should mysql-8.0 be removed as well from unstable?
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:05:38PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> This has now landed in the release pocket. Thanks to all involved for
> your help.
You may have noticed that Debian CTTE have overruled some of these
changes in the debianutils package in Debian and reverted them in Debian
Hi Jeremy,
It's not your fault. This is something your sponsor is supposed to have
checked.
@Alberto
Please could you properly review this, make sure it meets SRU policy,
try to anticipate and answer any questions the SRU team might have in
advance, and then work with Jeremy to resubmit to the
Hi Jeremy,
It's not your fault. This is something your sponsor is supposed to have
checked.
@Alberto
Please could you properly review this, make sure it meets SRU policy,
try to anticipate and answer any questions the SRU team might have in
advance, and then work with Jeremy to resubmit to the
Hi Jeremy,
It's not your fault. This is something your sponsor is supposed to have
checked.
@Alberto
Please could you properly review this, make sure it meets SRU policy,
try to anticipate and answer any questions the SRU team might have in
advance, and then work with Jeremy to resubmit to the
Hi Jeremy,
It's not your fault. This is something your sponsor is supposed to have
checked.
@Alberto
Please could you properly review this, make sure it meets SRU policy,
try to anticipate and answer any questions the SRU team might have in
advance, and then work with Jeremy to resubmit to the
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 02:11:36PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> Imagine you land a bugfix in an SRU to Focal today, but leave out
> Impish even though it is also affected. A user who subsequently
> installs Focal, benefits from the bugfix, and then upgrades to Impish
> will
** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04-feature-freeze
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945956
Title:
mysql-8.0: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0
To
** Changed in: ruby3.0 (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04-feature-freeze
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946190
Title:
ruby2.7: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0
To manage
** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04-feature-freeze
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946205
Title:
squid: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0
To manage
** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04-feature-freeze
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955009
Title:
Freeradius 3.0.21+dfsg-3build1 fails test of
Is there nobody using Ubuntu itself who will be able to help test at
all?
Is anyone willing to fire up an Ubuntu live image to help test it there?
If so, maybe it's worth seeing if the race reproduces in a live
environment on Ubuntu first?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Is there nobody using Ubuntu itself who will be able to help test at
all?
Is anyone willing to fire up an Ubuntu live image to help test it there?
If so, maybe it's worth seeing if the race reproduces in a live
environment on Ubuntu first?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Is there nobody using Ubuntu itself who will be able to help test at
all?
Is anyone willing to fire up an Ubuntu live image to help test it there?
If so, maybe it's worth seeing if the race reproduces in a live
environment on Ubuntu first?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
An upload of xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm to focal-proposed has been
rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "Proposed fix
regresses non-root use as discussed in the bug.".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
An upload of ubuntu-drivers-common to impish-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
An upload of nvidia-settings to focal-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is
An upload of nvidia-settings to impish-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages,
An upload of nvidia-settings to focal-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages,
An upload of nvidia-settings to impish-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
An upload of nvidia-settings to impish-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is
An upload of ubuntu-drivers-common to impish-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
An upload of ubuntu-drivers-common to focal-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
An upload of ubuntu-drivers-common to focal-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
An upload of nvidia-settings to focal-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
An upload of ubuntu-drivers-common to impish-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
An upload of ubuntu-drivers-common to focal-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Missing SRU information: no regression analysis (ie. "Where things go
wrong" formerly "Regression Potential").
Please follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
properly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to
An upload of nvidia-settings to impish-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Missing SRU information: no regression analysis (ie. "Where things go
wrong" formerly "Regression Potential").
Please follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
properly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
Missing SRU information: no regression analysis (ie. "Where things go
wrong" formerly "Regression Potential").
Please follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
properly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to
An upload of ubuntu-drivers-common to impish-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
An upload of nvidia-settings to focal-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
An upload of ubuntu-drivers-common to focal-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/+bug/1957094/comments/12".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Missing SRU information: no regression analysis (ie. "Where things go
wrong" formerly "Regression Potential").
Please follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
properly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
> Compressed kernels as we have on arm64 cause grub to fail in two
ways...
OK, but you haven't specified how this impacts the user. Please justify
the SRU on the basis of what impact this issue has *on the user*.
Otherwise I can't review it for appropriateness under our SRU policy.
For example:
Or is it that you're looking to enable secure boot on this architecture?
In that case, please make that clear, and provide a Test Plan that
includes testing that complete user story.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
An upload of v4l2loopback to focal-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "Clearing this from the queue for
now as it isn't ready for an SRU to Focal. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/v4l2loopback/+bug/1921474/comments/12
and subsequent comments for
An upload of v4l2loopback to focal-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "Clearing this from the queue for
now as it isn't ready for an SRU to Focal. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/v4l2loopback/+bug/1921474/comments/12
and subsequent comments for
Hi Frank,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:46:26AM +0100, Frank Heimes wrote:
> please import "openssl-ibmca" for the use with "git-ubuntu" - thanks you !
This is in progress. There's a bit of a backlog at the moment so it may
take a few hours to appear.
--
Mailing list:
There's nothing I know of stopping this from landing except for a proper
review. But since you've chosen to wholesale bump the version instead of
backporting a minimal fix, that review is much more complicated than it
needed to be (including a new dependency package that I don't have
powers myself
1101 - 1200 of 17436 matches
Mail list logo
