Re: [cisco-voip] SMS message

dress, which, in theory, would be delivered as an SMS text to the recipient. Thanks, -R Thanks, Ryan Huff From: cisco-voip on behalf of harbor235 Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 9:19:58 AM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] SMS message Hi everyone, Is it pos

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Certificate issue and I am rubbish at certificates. (full disclosure)

Sovereign Citizen. That’s just funny. Thanks, Ryan Huff From: cisco-voip on behalf of Hunter Fuller Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 12:14:27 PM To: Matthew Loraditch Cc: Terry Oakley ; voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Certificate issue and I

[cisco-voip] FXS ordering question

Does any know if the base NIM-4FXS SKU has the PVDM4 already on the NIM, or do I need to buy the PVDM4 and add it in to the NIM? I assume it does come with it because unlike the MFT T1 there is no other use for the NIM-4FXS without DSP. Thanks, Ryan Huff

Re: [cisco-voip] FX0 pool exhuastion

port summary" which gives you a real-time / at-the-moment state of each FXO/S voice port Absent that, you'd likely be relegated to the above, in an "on demand / manual" way. Thanks, Ryan Thanks, Ryan Huff From: cisco-voip on behalf of

Re: [cisco-voip] Voicemail alternative with cisco CME

In theory, you could make a SIP trunk connection to “whatever” and make blind/supervised transfer to “whatever”. As far as a tightly integrated or native solution however, an old CUE or CUC is your best bet. Thanks, Ryan Huff From: cisco-voip on behalf of

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA voice quality issues with Optimum/Altice

I know you didn’t ask for solutions… however, you might consider throwing an SDWAN appliance in front of the Expressway. The forward error correction capabilities might help with the jitter / lack of end to end EF queue. Get Outlook for iOS

Re: [cisco-voip] Error upgrade UCS server to ESXi 6.7

It’s possible the vibs aren’t in use, making this a harmless process, but I’d verify first. There is a nice walk through here: https://thesleepyadmins.com/2020/08/06/vmware-esxi-6-7-upgrade-missing-dependency-vibs-error/ Get Outlook for iOS

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXTERNAL] Re: Issue with Legit DIDs Flagged as "Potential SPAM"

CNAME dips are done by the called party carrier. Nothing you can do to change that other than change the calling party ANI or work with the calling/called party carrier to correct the database entry. Get Outlook for iOS From: cisco-voip on

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM call set up issue after migration

This would be discovered in the “utils diagnose test” however, I have seen on more than one occasion, in a “node-move-IP-change” situation, where either the reverse DNS entry didn’t get changed, or more scrupulously, the incorrect one exists along with the correct one. -Ryan On Jan 12, 2021, a

Re: [cisco-voip] Different MOH for multi site

A little more cumbersome, but common device configuration (CDC) should offer you this flexibility. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 5, 2021, at 15:18, f...@browardcommunications.com wrote: > > That’s where I’m confused, I don’t see where you can set a specific audio > source per site, or device p

Re: [cisco-voip] List still active?

taying healthy and > employed. Hope those aren’t reasons for the decline in forum usage. > > Sent from an iPhone mobile device with very tiny touchscreen input keys. > Please excude my typtos. > >> On Dec 25, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Ryan Huff wrote: >> >> I still

Re: [cisco-voip] List still active?

I still see you. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 25, 2020, at 14:28, Bill Talley wrote: > > I stopped receive list emails. Is the list dead or was I banned? 😉 > > Sent from an iPhone mobile device with very tiny touchscreen input keys. > Please excude my typtos. > ___

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity xfer Getting 603 from carrier

is a bit of a mess, so I feel that if I change one thing, 10 other things will break. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 29, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Try adding “midcall-signaling passthru media-change” under voice service voip -> sip. Thanks, Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity xfer Getting 603 from carrier

Try adding “midcall-signaling passthru media-change” under voice service voip -> sip. Thanks, Ryan Sent from my iPhone On Jul 29, 2020, at 07:45, "f...@browardcommunications.com" wrote:  Greetings all, this might be simple fix, I just haven’t dealt with this in a while. We have a unity A

Re: [cisco-voip] how to disable backup warning message on cucm

No way to disable the alert message that I’m aware of. I think DRS is an unavoidable assumption (and by extension m, the alert) in the modern versions. As you know, this isn’t a great strategy. It’s a little more than, “not recommended”, it’s actually not supported by Cisco to backup this way. V

Re: [cisco-voip] DRS Message Restore & DRS File Decrypter Updated

Cool man! Take a victory lap cause Cisco is no longer going to play “hide the cheese” with you each time they tweak the salt functions in new versions. Think of all the free time! Lol... cheers Pete. Sent from my iPhone On May 11, 2020, at 16:23, Pete Brown wrote:  Yes, all that’s been iron

Re: [cisco-voip] sip 404 not found for incoming calls

From: Ryan Huff Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 10:50 PM To: naresh rathore Cc: Amit Kumar ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] sip 404 not found for incoming calls Naresh, Any chance you could send a ccsip messages and a voice ccapi inout debug from a

Re: [cisco-voip] sip 404 not found for incoming calls

Naresh, Any chance you could send a ccsip messages and a voice ccapi inout debug from a failed inbound call? Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2020, at 06:28, naresh rathore wrote:  hi I tried both, via translation pattern or directly pointing a particular number to phone but still the same

Re: [cisco-voip] Ported Numbers to SIP call handler transfer is not working correctly.

Guide for like an SX20 or something, and I couldn't find RFC2833 mentioned anywhere, but it did mention RFC4733. Anyway, that's all the trivia I have for now. On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:17 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: RCF 4733, I believe. Sent from my iPhone

Re: [cisco-voip] Ported Numbers to SIP call handler transfer is not working correctly.

RCF 4733, I believe. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 24, 2020, at 10:58, Anthony Holloway wrote:  Actually you don't want to set rfc2833 (pop quiz: rfc2833 is not the real RFC number. What's the real RFC number? Don't google it, but reply if you know!) on your CUCM SIP Trunk to CUBE. You want

Re: [cisco-voip] Ported Numbers to SIP call handler transfer is not working correctly.

Given the statement, “We ported our numbers to SIP yesterday. Now, their main menu is not transferring numbers correctly”, I’m taking the change in ingress signaling as the change agent and assuming nothing was changed in CUC/CUCM. I’d suspect DTMF to be the cause in this case, as this can be a

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXTERNAL] Re: PSTN Calls Incorrectly Flagged as "Potential SPAM"

everyone. Jason From: Ryan Huff Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 1:52 PM To: JASON BURWELL Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN Calls Incorrectly Flagged as "Potential SPAM" You need to become a thorn in the side of the AM for your upstream carrier.

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXTERNAL] Re: PSTN Calls Incorrectly Flagged as "Potential SPAM"

do about it? Jason From: Ryan Huff Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 12:30 PM To: JASON BURWELL Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN Calls Incorrectly Flagged as "Potential SPAM" CAUTION: This email originated outside of Founders Federal Credit Uni

Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN Calls Incorrectly Flagged as "Potential SPAM"

I’ve seen this happen on my Verizon cell recently. Was very surprised, it was the first time I had ever seen it. CNAME dips and presentation are done by the called party’s carrier, so there isn’t anything (functionally) the calling party’s PBX can do to influence that. CNAME inserts are done by

[cisco-voip] Hey everyone

Totally not “voice related” however... I created a MineCraft server for my kids this evening, and I added a public domain to it. S, if your "co workers" are stressing you out for the next couple weeks, and they happen to have MineCraft Java edition, have them add the multiplayer server quar

Re: [cisco-voip] Help with Test Calls

Yeah, sounds like you may have the problem sorted/known, and if it truly is that other carrier’s have an offending/stale route that need updated... its a pain cause sometimes the issue isn’t always with the LEC, it can be upstream to the LEC too. Having users open tickets with their carrier

Re: [cisco-voip] CUC 6 Second Intervals of Silence

It would’ve interesting to know; - vCPU (1 or 2) - OVA template size - Is unified messaging configured Sent from my iPhone On Feb 15, 2020, at 00:09, Anthony Holloway wrote:  There's post on the ciscoUC subreddit about CUC greetings sounding "garbled" and it turns out there is a small bit o

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Expansion

For 11.x, but I've found this helpful: https://www.cisco.com/web/software/283088407/126036/cucm-11.0.ova.readme.txt Thanks, Ryan From: Matthew Loraditch Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 5:24 PM To: Ryan Huff ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE:

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Expansion

I wouldn't see a reason not to just up-size the two nodes you have now to the 2.5k OVA (use 2 vCPU on each node). For the 15 pieces of flair, I'd then add in a 3rd 2.5k OVA w/o the CCM service enabled and run TFTP.. etc on it and give the pub a break. -Ryan Fro

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXT] Re: Expressway Cluster failover for MRA...

precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles Sent: Friday, Febru

Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO

as cleared in writing to use it. I've never had TAC check my files before, but there is always the possibility. PUT can be a bit delayed (at least it has been for me), but never more than about 24 hours. Seems we get most orders in within 12 - 18 hours. On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:

Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO

6, 2020, at 12:17 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be super useful to me. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Paw

Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO

I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be super useful to me. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Pawlowski, Adam wrote:  As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales ord

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXTERNAL] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO

The PUT has been useless to me outside of some upgrade entitlement scenarios. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:29, JASON BURWELL via cisco-voip wrote:  I’ve always wondered the same thing so I’ll be interested to hear some other answers. PUT has never worked properly for me and no o

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco website downloads

Working now. From: Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Sunday, February 2, 2020 12:05 PM To: Anthony Holloway Cc: Ryan Huff ; cisco-voip voip list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco website downloads I just checked. Looks like it’s fixed? -sent from mobile device- Lelio

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Cluster failover for MRA...

That seems correct. It seems like you’re speaking about an outbound flow and Lelio is speaking about an inbound flow. The traversal client cluster (the CS) should know about all the peers in the traversal server cluster (the Es). Sent from my iPhone On Jan 29, 2020, at 15:21, Jonathan Charles

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Cluster failover for MRA...

0423489&sdata=38rrvBTpkfDz6yh1PDl6tp6fIVqwrbe3CGG%2BuavwjIY%3D&reserved=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook On Jan 28, 2020, at 9:03 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: 1.) It used to be in previous versions that all cluster nodes could technically

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Cluster failover for MRA...

n.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uoguelph.ca%2Fccs&data=02%7C01%7C%7C28abee85602c4394504a08d7a4e5024d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637159175814864913&sdata=4Ty7ZYZ77QBJ6FCaao%2FQOZRlnNj7Oi4y%2BOBQzilxEIA%3D&reserved=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook On Jan 2

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Cluster failover for MRA...

1.) It used to be in previous versions that all cluster nodes could technically be active at any time and SRV weights and priorities could influence the path selection but not guarantee it end-to-end when all cluster nodes are up and running. I believe this behavior has changed/improved and I t

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXTERNAL] Finesse dropping calls upon answer

To add on to this, you may also want to verify that if you are doing EO in cucm’s trunk sip profile, that you also don’t have EO set on the cube. That would potentially cause this issue too. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 17, 2020, at 17:37, Kent Roberts wrote:  Additional to Nicks’ response….

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice traffic over SDWAN

If your SD-WAN solution has packet duplication (aka 0 time failover) my experience is that it tends to work well. Other SD-WAN solutions may work better for VoIP if you can pin SIP/s RTP/sRTP to one side or the other (active/passive over active/active). Depending on the VoIP and SD-WAN scenario

Re: [cisco-voip] Inbound MGCP call dead-air

booted the CCM cluster and the problem persisted... Traces show no sign of the call int he calllog... Jonathan On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:00 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Have you pulled a ccm trace and debug voice ccapi inout, to verif you’re not seeing any weird

Re: [cisco-voip] Inbound MGCP call dead-air

Have you pulled a ccm trace and debug voice ccapi inout, to verif you’re not seeing any weirdness there? “no mgcp / mgcp” has been known to fix weird things; I assume you’ve tried that though. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 18, 2019, at 19:59, Jonathan Charles wrote:  Inbound call (to x2475) on

Re: [cisco-voip] best way to move CUCM Publisher from one host/DC to another

ce) works in the real world. * Ryan From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> on behalf of Charles Goldsmith mailto:w...@woka.us>> Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 at 10:37 AM To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Cc: cisco-voip list mailto:cisco-

Re: [cisco-voip] best way to move CUCM Publisher from one host/DC to another

next time I migrate. On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:26 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Yes, SCP is beholden to the line rate between the hosts. Though VMWare doesn’t “recommend” it, I can say I’ve also never had a problem with it, FWIW... and yeah, super convenient. Is

Re: [cisco-voip] best way to move CUCM Publisher from one host/DC to another

a%7C1%7C0%7C63711627633116&sdata=knBH29jcaYeLJNpDcAsbUb4KgtvLDFYZdpU0FSnhy5Y%3D&reserved=0> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 7:50 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I don’t think vMotion would change the MAC address, UUID.. etc and I think you’d be fine (not

Re: [cisco-voip] best way to move CUCM Publisher from one host/DC to another

I don’t think vMotion would change the MAC address, UUID.. etc and I think you’d be fine (not while the VM is powered on though). Typically, what I do is power the VM down and SCP the VM folder to the target host from the source host (requires SSH server/client be enabled and excluded in the ho

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5.1.11900 active partition high usage

crash dumps? > On Dec 4, 2019, at 11:38 AM, Ryan Huff > mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: > > Are the trace collection thresholds higher than normal? Call Management > Records enabled? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Dec 4, 2019, at 12:37, Erick Bergq

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5.1.11900 active partition high usage

Are the trace collection thresholds higher than normal? Call Management Records enabled? Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 4, 2019, at 12:37, Erick Bergquist wrote: > > Has anyone seen where the active partition on 12.5.1.11900 is 96% full? > > 2 vCPU, 8 gig RAM, 110gig disk size. > > Seeing the

Re: [cisco-voip] Native Call Queuing on UCM 12.5 with SIP Trunks

Adam, I've not encountered the streaming issue with a SIP trunk, just H.323.. interesting. Out of curiosity, what code level in the ISR G2 did you go to when you encountered this? The behavior of simplex streaming is to send a null/fake IP address in the logic channel multimedia control messag

Re: [cisco-voip] Native Call Queuing on UCM 12.5 with SIP Trunks

Mark, That is a good thought.. there are a few scenarios where a CUCM/CUC.. etc mid call change will advertise a "no media change" reINVITE out to the PSTN. While I don't think that would be the case here (I would expect the peer to drop the call because they couldn't negotiate the null/0.0.0.0

Re: [cisco-voip] Native Call Queuing on UCM 12.5 with SIP Trunks

Additionally, If it’s a custom MoH (not the built in Cisco tune), make sure the file is uploaded to each CUCM server individually; the working phone 2 phone scenario could be happening on nodes where the moh file is, and the trunk registered to a node where it is not. Thanks, Ryan On Dec 2, 2

Re: [cisco-voip] Preservation Mode, long time for call setups...

. If the customer understands the caveats to teaming and accepts that, great. If they are more of the “it guy that just wants the phones to ring”, perhaps not. -Ryan On Nov 28, 2019, at 14:49, Ryan Huff wrote:  The issues I’ve experienced with it, admittedly, have nothing to do (generally

Re: [cisco-voip] Preservation Mode, long time for call setups...

es that occur on the vSphere standard switch... I am going to suggest they change it back to originating port ID and break the channel group. Jonathan On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 7:37 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Honestly, and this is just my preference based on my

Re: [cisco-voip] Preservation Mode, long time for call setups...

hether nic teaming is a material requirement in your environment, but if it is not, I'd consider un-teaming and just going to active/standby. Thanks, Ryan ____ From: Jonathan Charles Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 7:48 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.

Re: [cisco-voip] Preservation Mode, long time for call setups...

I would expect the same behavior from PAgP with ESXi. -Ryan On Nov 27, 2019, at 19:19, Jonathan Charles wrote:  They are channel group ON... (so, no LACP) on the switch... Jonathan On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 6:16 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: AFAIK, VMware has

Re: [cisco-voip] Preservation Mode, long time for call setups...

basic license. On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 6:11 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Route based on IP hash should be fine for 802.3ad, but technically, VMWare only supports it with a distributed vSwitch (would need an EA or Enterprise license for the hypervisor, not the “free” l

Re: [cisco-voip] Preservation Mode, long time for call setups...

, at 19:11, Ryan Huff wrote: Route based on IP hash should be fine for 802.3ad, but technically, VMWare only supports it with a distributed vSwitch (would need an EA or Enterprise license for the hypervisor, not the “free” license) and not a standard vSwitch. I’ve seen it work with a standard

Re: [cisco-voip] Preservation Mode, long time for call setups...

Route based on IP hash should be fine for 802.3ad, but technically, VMWare only supports it with a distributed vSwitch (would need an EA or Enterprise license for the hypervisor, not the “free” license) and not a standard vSwitch. I’ve seen it work with a standard vSwitch, for long periods of tim

Re: [cisco-voip] unityconnection db replication issue

%3D&reserved=0> From: cisco-voip on behalf of naresh rathore Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 8:29:56 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unityconnection db replication issue hi Ryan following is the output admin:utils diagnose test Log fil

Re: [cisco-voip] unityconnection db replication issue

Run “ utils diagnose test “ from the primary CLI; everything pass? Sent from my iPhone On Nov 25, 2019, at 20:11, naresh rathore wrote:  hi, unityconnection version is Version 11.5.1.14900-11 . I am currently facing db replication issue. following is the output of utils dbreplication status

Re: [cisco-voip] VCS Expressway upgrade, 8.7 to 12.5

at 5:54 PM Jonathan Charles mailto:jonv...@gmail.com>> wrote: I re-uploaded the root and intermediate CA certificate... still get the same error... I also tried adding a new AXL user... same error... Jonathan On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 5:48 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com&g

Re: [cisco-voip] VCS Expressway upgrade, 8.7 to 12.5

he ability to play with the openssl cipher strings but in my limited experience trying to change those to bump them up a notch, it ends up breaking XMPP or something. Adam From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles Sent: Friday, Novembe

Re: [cisco-voip] VCS Expressway upgrade, 8.7 to 12.5

A couple of thoughts for you... * Get the software release key for 12.x now (you'll be asked to enter it during the upgrade in the GUI). You'll need to work with TAC > GLO for this if (and I assume this would be your case) the existing 8.7 serial is active in Cisco's licensing system. The

Re: [cisco-voip] DNS and LDAP Domain name change - current process node is IP

different LDAP servers with the same usernames. The servers are configured with a DNS domain and DNS servers but they process node ID is the IP address of the servers (without the suffix) Does that make sense? On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 3:26 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wro

Re: [cisco-voip] DNS and LDAP Domain name change - current process node is IP

what are you trying to do? Do you need to add a domain name to UC servers that currently do not have a domain name? Sent from my iPhone On Nov 11, 2019, at 18:21, Nick Britt wrote:  A customer has had a domain name, this includes the DNS and the active directory integration. I am trying to p

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster certificates.

, Ariel. De: Ryan Huff Enviado el: lunes, 14 de octubre de 2019 18:14 Para: ROZA, Ariel CC: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Asunto: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster certificates. Are the expressway-C server using self-signed certificates (I doubt it because you said they are multi-san

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster certificates.

Are the expressway-C server using self-signed certificates (I doubt it because you said they are multi-san)? Generally, CUCM doesn’t need to trust the identity certificate (unless it is self signed). In all other cases, CUCM needs to trust the certificate authority the signed the expressway-c c

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX not working after change to SIP

few logs to see what its doing with uccx in the mix. On Oct 13, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Sort of sounds like you may have a Class of Service (CSS/Partition) issue with the SIP trunk between CUBE and CUCM, since that is most likely the most signi

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX not working after change to SIP

*** Regional issues would NOT cause a 404 response generally. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2019, at 22:15, Ryan Huff wrote:  Sort of sounds like you may have a Class of Service (CSS/Partition) issue with the SIP trunk between CUBE and CUCM, since that is most likely the most significant

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX not working after change to SIP

Sort of sounds like you may have a Class of Service (CSS/Partition) issue with the SIP trunk between CUBE and CUCM, since that is most likely the most significant configuration change/add since moving to SIP, that could generate 404 responses. Could also be an issue with the device pool on the

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

%3D&reserved=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Webex Hybrid Calling (with Expressway B2B), could in theory, help accomplish this. The codec

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

can add the short domain to the list of the CUCM “owned” domains in enterprise parameters. From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 8:51 PM To: NateCCIE mailto:natec...@gmail.com>> Cc: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; cisco-voip v

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

iPhone On Oct 4, 2019, at 22:57, NateCCIE wrote:  Doesn’t cucm have the ability to look at the user portion of the URI only? For like when you’re routing to a DN? Or I think you can add the short domain to the list of the CUCM “owned” domains in enterprise parameters. From: Ryan Huff Sent

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

ebb5008d7493d7691%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637058400631419029&sdata=Bm%2FOh%2Fp3TDYkOYis27I47D3rrDAJDEp4doaBw5lr9XA%3D&reserved=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outloo

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

c1b45238c9d08d749390724%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637058381594062845&sdata=NZ1r%2BfF%2FekCgt%2FARyjJ3rxBVHLHQXVdDERhMIM4sISE%3D&reserved=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, a

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

eserved=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 7:46 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: According to RFC 2782 (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt<https://nam04.safelinks.pr

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

According to RFC 2782 (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt), it does not, under the “Target Definition”; “there must be one or more address records for this name, the name must not be an alias”. However, I can tell you that I have used a CNAME in the SRV target field before, and it appeared to

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone 8811 backgrounds

I find that on-prem CUCM is still used fairly substantially.. :). The thumbnail needs to be PNG and 139x109 (not 159x109). I’d also double check the spelling and casing of the directory in TFTP; Desktops/800x400 Your images must be in PNG format and the dimensions of the full sized image must b

Re: [cisco-voip] TAC Support for Unsupported Configurations

Wow, this one hits home.. I’ve found (and this is just my experience, which is entirely subjective) that, if in a dire moment of need, on a Saturday morning at 12:12 AM EST, if you show a humanness to yourself, TAC will show moments of kindness ... supporting the statement that yes indeed, it r

Re: [cisco-voip] CIMC MIC self-signed cert and new browsers

May want to look at the browser’s address bar and see if there is an applet / plugin looking for permission to run. - R On Aug 29, 2019, at 01:56, Dana Tong wrote:  Hi all, New server install. Trying to login to the CIMC to configure. Chrome, Firefox, IE all have a hissy fit. I did manage t

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

he time? Google Chrome is on version 76. But seriously though, anyone got a reference to this announcement? I didn't see it in the cisco live preso linked earlier. If not, what's the reported reason for dropping minor release numbers? On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ryan Huff mai

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

ng more inline with software revisionist trends .. etc. -Ryan From: Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 10:31 AM To: Matthew Loraditch ; Anthony Holloway ; Ryan Huff Cc: Charles Goldsmith ; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release c

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

After 12.5, no more “.5” releases, it’ll just be major versions (and the SUs in between). After 12.5 we skip 13 and go right to 14 (then presumably, 15 after that). Sent from my iPhone On Aug 15, 2019, at 02:05, Anthony Holloway wrote:  What's going on with .5 releases? I don't think I hea

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity DRS components

In Unity, the Primary and HA DRS components are separated and operate independently. Though it’s generally not necessary to backup the HA node. - In a DR recovery scenario of both Unity Servers, you can restore the Primary and install a new HA. - In a DR recovery scenario of the HA only, just i

Re: [cisco-voip] Do you need TMS to get OBTP

To do OBTP on prem; TMS/TMS-XE. If you want to go the cloud registration route for the endpoint, Expressway-C/management connector and Hybrid calendar connector (on-prem Exchange) or cloud (Webex) calendar (O365 or Google) Sent from my iPhone On Aug 7, 2019, at 12:39, Jonathan Charles mailto:j

Re: [cisco-voip] Uplinx Report Tool?

and, you can maximize the application window.. *key selling point* lol. Seriously though, both are really good products. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2019, at 06:51, Stephen Welsh mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com>> wrote: Hi Nick, hope you are well. Yes I do follow this email group (a

Re: [cisco-voip] Uplinx Report Tool?

I use them all the time. As long as you invest the time to creating good CSS and templates, it’s great. The default templates are generic and just create “data dumps” in Word format... IMO. However, and this is my one diva moment here, the GUI wind will not maximize, lol... they jail it for a s

Re: [cisco-voip] Configure Vg224 fxs as fxo

There are hardware differences between an fxs and fxo port Sent from my iPhone On Jul 15, 2019, at 18:20, Fares Alsaafani mailto:fares@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi guys, I would like to ask if it possible configuring vg224 ports fxs as fxo to support overhead paging that is connect via Bogan Tam

Re: [cisco-voip] CPU Reservations

People view dial tone as if it were in the US Bill of Rights. Let it not be there when expected and see what happens. It’s a fascinating social experience. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2019, at 10:47, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: My answer back to them is this most of the

Re: [cisco-voip] CPU Reservations

Adam, You'd probably be less likely to have an "issue" if the host's aggregate compute resources are at least 30%-35% below subscribed capacity (but no guarantees). Real time traffic on the software such as mtp, moh,.. etc (I think UCOS even has some files that internally communicate via real t

Re: [cisco-voip] How difficult is hybrid call (connector) setup ?

&reserved=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Jul 2, 2019, at 9:49 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: It’s not that bad (maybe 1 - 2 hours to get a functional test going). The most unexpect

Re: [cisco-voip] How difficult is hybrid call (connector) setup ?

It’s not that bad (maybe 1 - 2 hours to get a functional test going). The most unexpected thing I think you may run into is the use/need for MTLS (TCP:5062) between the Edge and Control Hub. Also, your Expressway version should be 12.5.x (I think 8.11.4 may still work but you’ll get an alarm tel

Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P Upgrade Steps during CUCM upgrade

Actually, I prefer to disable IMP HA before installing in the inactive PT. This way, if you have to flip back to the other partition for some reason, IMP is already in an “HA disabled” state, which tends to make IMP recover a little better in my experience. Then just enable HA once everything is

Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P Upgrade Steps during CUCM upgrade

This is what I do for an in-place upgrade with no other changes (hostname, IP address.. etc). I do the cucm pub first (obviously), then imp pub (which is more like a cucm sub for upgrade purposes), then all the cucm and imp subs; everything into the inactive pt. I do the pubs individually, the

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple native CI/CH WebEx sites in same control hub org

I do Sent from my iPhone On May 23, 2019, at 19:09, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Can anyone confirm they have a control hub org with multiple control hub / common identity managed Webex sites enabled? I’m not talking linked sites. These are WebEx sites that were created f

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

rh...@byteworks.com<mailto:rh...@byteworks.com>, if any hard chargers are in the process of setting up a space... Sent from my iPhone On May 23, 2019, at 14:13, Peter Slow mailto:peter.s...@gmail.com>> wrote: I want some Cheetos! I’ll be there! On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

n events, humor and commentary on what was being learned that week. I might even been in the Engineering Deathmatch again, as a defending champ. I hope to god they don't put me up against you Ryan. Fingers crossed. On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:19 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>&g

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

egree. I really need to meditate or something. On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:39 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Yup, this stuff is soo fluid right now, it’s a contradictory mess 😂. The on-prem registration, IMHO, is rrr from prime time (as you even noted, “prev

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

remove their old Hybrid config to make them work. Looks like you’d still need to retain Hybrid Call for cloud registered devices. There was one specific annoyance with the Hybrid Call from the apps, and I can’t find it in my Teams search ☹ Cheers, Tim From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >