Hello S Lists :-)
You are now subscribed
Empty Message
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On 11/05/09 15:52, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:10:00PM -0500, Marcus Griep wrote:
>> Don't know if any one else has seen or taken a look at this. I don't know if
>> this affects Tor, though I believe that we do use certificate renegotiation
>> in the protocol, and that is the
FYI, there is a brief flare up of discussion on the North American
Network Operators' Group (NANOG) mailing list about Tor. If interested,
the thread in the web accessible archives kicks off here -
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2009-June/011485.html
-Andrew
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:47:01 -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
> But, Roger, will the 0.2.0.19-alpha release at least confirm during
> the reachability tests that it is talking to itself and not to some other
> server?
I am not sure that is what is happening. For example, it may be that the
reachab
