Re: [Freevo-users] WinTV cards

2003-07-21 Thread Simon Kenyon
On Monday 21 July 2003 17:30, Ralph Buchanan wrote: I guess that's where the problem lies. Is there any documentation out there that explains them? Is ptune required to get the tuner functioning? I'll keep hackin at it. I guess from what I'm reading I need to set the input correctly. Any help

Re: [Freevo-users] WinTV cards

2003-07-19 Thread Simon Kenyon
On Friday 18 July 2003 17:13, Ralph Buchanan wrote: Cool Simon, I just bought a WinTV 250 to replace my old ADS Channel Surfer bttv card. I tried installing the WinTV card last night but I'm having driver issues. Did you have to recompile your kernel with the ivtv drivers as modules? Any

Re: [Freevo-devel] how do i watch tv on non-standard frequencies?

2003-07-17 Thread Simon Kenyon
On Thursday 17 July 2003 13:11, Rob Shortt wrote: Ok, in my working copy I have custom channel frequencies working and here is what I have done: Added an item to freevo_config.py, FREQUENCY_TABLE = { 'tuner_id' :55250, } This is a dictionary that keys on the tunerid. If a user

Re: [Freevo-devel] how do i watch tv on non-standard frequencies?

2003-07-16 Thread Simon Kenyon
Rob Shortt wrote: Well, you are in luck! A couple days ago I have made a simple tv viewing plugin for the pvr-250/350. This also uses the frequency table module (freq.py) and NOT mplayer's real tv viewing capabilaties. Mplayer is just used to display the pvr output to the screen. So, we can

[Freevo-devel] how do i watch tv on non-standard frequencies?

2003-07-15 Thread Simon Kenyon
would it be possible for somebody to explain to me how i can configure freevo to work with non-standard broadcast frequencies. the cable compnay where i live (NTL, Dublin, Ireland) have decided in their infinite wisdom to use a completely non-standard set of frequencies. from what i can

Re: [Freevo-devel] how do i watch tv on non-standard frequencies?

2003-07-15 Thread Simon Kenyon
Rob Shortt wrote: Simon Kenyon wrote: would it be possible for somebody to explain to me how i can configure freevo to work with non-standard broadcast frequencies. the cable compnay where i live (NTL, Dublin, Ireland) have decided in their infinite wisdom to use a completely non-standard set

Re: EJBoss news and roadmap

2000-01-19 Thread Simon Kenyon
Rickard Öberg wrote: These are the key points as I see it. Isn't it reasonable that any changes to the server is submitted to the community? And isn't it equally reasonable that applications that simply want to use EJBoss to run does not have to use GPL? This is my interpretation at

RE: Verisign rejects CSR

1999-03-04 Thread Simon Kenyon
. Please contact your software vendor. one problem i had was putting an email address in the csr verisign reject requests with an @ sign in them sort of hard (these days) to create an email address without an @ sign just a thought -- Simon Kenyon irial limited mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10

problems with certificates

1998-12-17 Thread Simon Kenyon
i installed a self-signed certificate in my web site and the day before it expired i installed a new one. this seemed to screw up browsers that thought that the old one was valid. so i deleted the certificate out of netscape but for the life of me i cannot work out how to delet it from ie, anyone

Re: [ssl-users] Newbie question: what's the subject name of cert

1998-11-24 Thread Simon Kenyon
On 24-Nov-98 Vadim Fedukovich wrote: I'm new to ssl. I'd like to know what to put in subject name of a certificate. Some documents mention that it's the DN. Does this DN correspond to entry in my LDAP DIT ? Can I have different DNs in LDAP and certificate? It seems your question does

Re: [apache-ssl] Assertions considered bad!? (was: Re: [apache-s

1998-11-18 Thread Simon Kenyon
now children! -- simon __ Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl) www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/ Official Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Yeah: DSO support for mod_ssl...

1998-10-25 Thread Simon Kenyon
On 24-Oct-98 Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Oh sorry, I at least should say what the main key to DSO support for mod_ssl was: Instead of patching in SSL-things into the Apache core now a totally generic API extension is patched in (the apache.patch file now contains mainly non-SSL stuff). This

<    1   2   3   4