RKSimon wrote:
> > How easy would it be to add an option for this to update inline asm? I'm
> > not asking you to do this here, I just want to know if this approach would
> > make it straightforward to add in the future.
>
> Should we touch the inline asm? (GCC doesn't
RKSimon wrote:
How easy would it be to add an option for this to update inline asm? I'm not
asking you to do this here, I just want to know if this approach would make it
straightforward to add in the future.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96860
https://github.com/RKSimon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97721
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -749,6 +749,11 @@ def TuningUseGLMDivSqrtCosts
: SubtargetFeature<"use-glm-div-sqrt-costs", "UseGLMDivSqrtCosts", "true",
"Use Goldmont specific floating point div/sqrt costs">;
+// Starting with Redwood Cove architecture, the branch has branch taken hint
+//
https://github.com/RKSimon commented:
SGTM with a few minors
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+//=== X86FixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp Fix Buffer Security Check
Call---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+//=== X86FixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp Fix Buffer Security Check
Call---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+//=== X86FixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp Fix Buffer Security Check
Call---===//
RKSimon wrote:
X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
___
cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
+//=== X86FixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp Fix Buffer Security Check Call
RKSimon wrote:
Fix filename and '===// 'comment overflow
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
___
cfe-commits
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ set(sources
X86AvoidStoreForwardingBlocks.cpp
X86DynAllocaExpander.cpp
X86FixupSetCC.cpp
+ X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
RKSimon wrote:
(style) alpha sorting
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
https://github.com/RKSimon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96888
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
RKSimon wrote:
Cheers - I'll push this (without the assert) in a moment - that shouldn't get
in the way of working out why they aren't always paired.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96888
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/RKSimon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96888
>From 7f6614d8df9a5ed2027f90d813695bc43f1044b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Pilgrim
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:09:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Sema] LambdaScopeForCallOperatorInstantiationRAII - fix typo
@@ -2834,7 +2834,7 @@ ABIArgInfo
X86_64ABIInfo::classifyRegCallStructTypeImpl(QualType Ty, unsigned ,
unsigned ,
unsigned ) const {
- auto RT = Ty->getAs();
+ auto RT = Ty->castAs();
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-06-27T13:09:48+01:00
New Revision: 4d167fb28b8c8b2e278fb09b1c435db6d6393d56
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d167fb28b8c8b2e278fb09b1c435db6d6393d56
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d167fb28b8c8b2e278fb09b1c435db6d6393d56.diff
RKSimon wrote:
It would probably explain why the typo hasn't caused regression - I'm going off
static analysis reports here, not crash reports.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96888
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-06-27T12:29:55+01:00
New Revision: 286955caa32b5b9fd959176c85ffb925e8093a0d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/286955caa32b5b9fd959176c85ffb925e8093a0d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/286955caa32b5b9fd959176c85ffb925e8093a0d.diff
@@ -82,6 +94,8 @@ define void @tailcall_unrelated_frame() sspreq {
; LINUX-NEXT: .LBB1_2: # %CallStackCheckFailBlk
; LINUX-NEXT:.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
; LINUX-NEXT:callq __stack_chk_fail@PLT
+
+
RKSimon wrote:
superfluous
@@ -114,250 +25,93 @@ return:; preds = %entry
declare void @escape(ptr)
define void @test_vla(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
-; MSVC-X86-LABEL: test_vla:
-; MSVC-X86: # %bb.0:
-; MSVC-X86-NEXT:pushl %ebp
-; MSVC-X86-NEXT:movl %esp, %ebp
-; MSVC-X86-NEXT:pushl
@@ -9,95 +9,6 @@
@"\01LC" = internal constant [11 x i8] c"buf == %s\0A\00"; [#uses=1]
define void @test(ptr %a) nounwind ssp {
-; MSVC-X86-LABEL: test:
RKSimon wrote:
where did the test checks go?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
https://github.com/RKSimon created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96888
We should be checking for a failed dyn_cast on the ParentFD result - not the
loop invariant FD root value.
Seems to have been introduced in #65193
Noticed by static analyser (I have no specific test case).
RKSimon wrote:
> > So can we get all the mmx patches done in time for the 19.0 branch?
>
> Maybe? Depends on how the discussion on the other PR goes -- whether that
> proposal is acceptable, or if a different transition strategy is desired.
Apart from #96540 how many more patches do you
@@ -21,10 +21,29 @@ typedef int __v2si __attribute__((__vector_size__(8)));
typedef short __v4hi __attribute__((__vector_size__(8)));
typedef char __v8qi __attribute__((__vector_size__(8)));
RKSimon wrote:
Add a deprecation message if SSE2 is not defined or
@@ -614,12 +623,15 @@ _mm_shuffle_epi8(__m128i __a, __m128i __b)
///1: Clear the corresponding byte in the destination. \n
///0: Copy the selected source byte to the corresponding byte in the
///destination. \n
-///Bits [3:0] select the source byte to be
RKSimon wrote:
@mahesh-attarde please can you rebase against trunk - I've cleaned up the test
checks to help with the codegen diff
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1825,32 +1818,32 @@ def : ProcModel;
-def : Proc<"k6-2", [FeatureX87, FeatureCX8, Feature3DNow],
+def : Proc<"k6-2", [FeatureX87, FeatureCX8, FeatureMMX],
RKSimon wrote:
I think the best we can do is add FeaturePRFCHW as well?
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-06-21T17:42:00+01:00
New Revision: 35bfbb3b21e9874d03b730e8ce4eb98b1dcd2d28
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/35bfbb3b21e9874d03b730e8ce4eb98b1dcd2d28
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/35bfbb3b21e9874d03b730e8ce4eb98b1dcd2d28.diff
@@ -2296,33 +2296,55 @@ ExprResult
Sema::BuildBlockForLambdaConversion(SourceLocation CurrentLocation,
return BuildBlock;
}
+static FunctionDecl *getPatternFunctionDecl(FunctionDecl *FD) {
+ if (FD->getTemplatedKind() == FunctionDecl::TK_MemberSpecialization) {
+while
@@ -1825,32 +1818,32 @@ def : ProcModel;
-def : Proc<"k6-2", [FeatureX87, FeatureCX8, Feature3DNow],
+def : Proc<"k6-2", [FeatureX87, FeatureCX8],
RKSimon wrote:
These still need FeatureMMX and SSEPrefetch (or a similar flag)
@@ -7,151 +7,16 @@
*===---===
*/
+// 3dNow intrinsics are no longer supported, and this header remains only as a
+// stub for users who were including it to get to _m_prefetch or
+// _m_prefetchw. Such uses
RKSimon wrote:
I'd prefer we rip off ALL the 3dnow/mmx bandaid in one big series of patches -
and not split across the 19.X/20.X releases.
So can we get all the mmx patches done in time for the 19.0 branch?
Also, this "might" have bigger impact than the KNL changes - should we announce
the
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-06-19T16:55:33+01:00
New Revision: f7c96d5733915c4ea30dbd7852faffc9cef4aca9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7c96d5733915c4ea30dbd7852faffc9cef4aca9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7c96d5733915c4ea30dbd7852faffc9cef4aca9.diff
RKSimon wrote:
@aniplcc if the x86 builtins handling is causing a problem - could we split
this so the generic c code intrinsics (andn, blsr etc.) are done first?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94161
___
cfe-commits mailing list
RKSimon wrote:
Would it make sense to add a new header (SemaUtils.h? SemaTargetUtils.h?) to
move most of the exposed templated helpers to instead of Sema.h?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93966
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/RKSimon commented:
Maybe add this to ReleaseNotes?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon commented:
Maybe add a line to ReleaseNotes? But otherwise SGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
RKSimon wrote:
@FreddyLeaf This is corrupting git checkouts on windows - please can you revert
?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -63,6 +63,91 @@ unsigned __int64 test__emulu(unsigned int a, unsigned int b)
{
// CHECK: [[RES:%[0-9]+]] = mul nuw i64 [[Y]], [[X]]
// CHECK: ret i64 [[RES]]
+//
+// CHECK-I386-LABEL: define dso_local noundef i32 @test_outp(
+// CHECK-I386-SAME: i16 noundef zeroext
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-05-29T10:38:02+01:00
New Revision: f3fb7f569936db418feef98e4ae68777a9a4cd2a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3fb7f569936db418feef98e4ae68777a9a4cd2a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3fb7f569936db418feef98e4ae68777a9a4cd2a.diff
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-05-29T10:38:03+01:00
New Revision: 9c42ed1371ee8c211aedcfe8aed16662a9befb69
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9c42ed1371ee8c211aedcfe8aed16662a9befb69
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9c42ed1371ee8c211aedcfe8aed16662a9befb69.diff
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-05-29T10:38:03+01:00
New Revision: 4bb6974a87e495f19faea4b13475a65e842473f0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4bb6974a87e495f19faea4b13475a65e842473f0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4bb6974a87e495f19faea4b13475a65e842473f0.diff
RKSimon wrote:
Not sure - CI checks aren't running either
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
RKSimon wrote:
@endilll Thanks for working on this - out of interest are you intending to do
this for CGBuiltin as well? Is the plan to no longer have to include all target
builtins in all clang builds?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93098
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
LGTM with one minor
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92883
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ Changes to the Windows Target
Changes to the X86 Backend
--
+- Removed knl/knm specific ISA lowerings: AVX512PF, AVX512ER, PREFETCHWT1,
RKSimon wrote:
"ISA intrinsics" instead?
https://github.com/RKSimon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92883
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon commented:
constexpr handling?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91306
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -232,225 +232,225 @@ typedef char __v2qi __attribute__((__vector_size__(2)));
static __inline__ __m256i __DEFAULT_FN_ATTRS256
_mm256_mask_add_epi32(__m256i __W, __mmask8 __U, __m256i __A, __m256i __B)
{
- return (__m256i)__builtin_ia32_selectd_256((__mmask8)__U,
-
@@ -3019,6 +3019,26 @@ C-style cast applied to each element of the first
argument.
Query for this feature with ``__has_builtin(__builtin_convertvector)``.
+``__builtin_selectvector``
+--
+
+``__builtin_selectvector`` is used to express generic vector
https://github.com/RKSimon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92055
>From 6946c9f1285d5a27eafcdbf13f79c0641736198d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sunil Kuravinakop
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 12:09:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Avoiding DeclRefExpr with "non_odr_use_unevaluated" to
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ define i32 @xunp(ptr %p) nounwind readnone {
; BMI264-NEXT:rorxl $7, (%rdi), %eax
; BMI264-NEXT:retq
entry:
-; shld-label: xunp:
+; shld-LABEL: xunp:
; shld: shldl $25
RKSimon wrote:
remove these 2 checks (the auto checks above
https://github.com/RKSimon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90391
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90391
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -target-cpu core2 %s -S -emit-llvm
-o - | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK64 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple
https://github.com/RKSimon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon commented:
Please address the clang-format warnings the CI has reported
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90391
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/RKSimon commented:
Please update the PR subject as its a lot more than just X86AsmParser.cpp
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90391
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/RKSimon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ class IRBuilderResult : public Result {
std::map IntegerArgs;
IRBuilderResult(StringRef CallPrefix, std::vector Args,
RKSimon wrote:
std::vector Args?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89202
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ class IRBuilderResult : public Result {
std::map IntegerArgs;
IRBuilderResult(StringRef CallPrefix, std::vector Args,
std::set AddressArgs,
RKSimon wrote:
std::set AddressArgs?
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ class IRIntrinsicResult : public Result {
std::vector ParamTypes;
std::vector Args;
IRIntrinsicResult(StringRef IntrinsicID, std::vector
ParamTypes,
RKSimon wrote:
std::vector ParamTypes?
https://github.com/RKSimon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87273
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -target-cpu core2 %s -S -emit-llvm
-o - | FileCheck %s
RKSimon wrote:
Please can you add the i686
RKSimon wrote:
@Amila-Rukshan please can you rebase this patch? merge is currently failing
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87273
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87273
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -target-cpu core2 %s -S -emit-llvm
-o - | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-linux-gnu -target-cpu core2
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= ,
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?= ,
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
RKSimon wrote:
Other than fixing the ReleaseNotes.rst conflict is there anything outstanding
on this now?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76615
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-04-11T14:02:56+01:00
New Revision: 6fd2fdccf2f28fc155f614eec41f785492aad618
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fd2fdccf2f28fc155f614eec41f785492aad618
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fd2fdccf2f28fc155f614eec41f785492aad618.diff
@@ -22,7 +22,11 @@ class FunctionPointer final {
const Function *Func;
public:
- FunctionPointer() : Func(nullptr) {}
+ // FIXME: We might want to track the fact that the Function pointer
+ // has been created from an integer and is most likely garbage anyway.
+
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-04-10T17:50:13+01:00
New Revision: 798e04f93769318db857b27f51020e7115e00301
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/798e04f93769318db857b27f51020e7115e00301
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/798e04f93769318db857b27f51020e7115e00301.diff
@@ -22,7 +22,11 @@ class FunctionPointer final {
const Function *Func;
public:
- FunctionPointer() : Func(nullptr) {}
+ // FIXME: We might want to track the fact that the Function pointer
+ // has been created from an integer and is most likely garbage anyway.
+
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-04-09T09:59:57+01:00
New Revision: 4ae33c52f794dbd64924dd006570cdc409c297bc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ae33c52f794dbd64924dd006570cdc409c297bc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ae33c52f794dbd64924dd006570cdc409c297bc.diff
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-04-08T14:31:46+01:00
New Revision: f139387fb6e76a5249e8d7c2d124565e6b566ef4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f139387fb6e76a5249e8d7c2d124565e6b566ef4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f139387fb6e76a5249e8d7c2d124565e6b566ef4.diff
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-04-08T14:31:46+01:00
New Revision: 0e8736694f752898ed7957a11a11c42f8f6a98d1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e8736694f752898ed7957a11a11c42f8f6a98d1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e8736694f752898ed7957a11a11c42f8f6a98d1.diff
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-04-04T14:59:00+01:00
New Revision: 110e933b7ae9150710a48b586fd3da39439079c2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/110e933b7ae9150710a48b586fd3da39439079c2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/110e933b7ae9150710a48b586fd3da39439079c2.diff
@@ -3578,7 +3578,7 @@ cleanupAroundReplacements(StringRef Code, const
tooling::Replacements ,
// We need to use lambda function here since there are two versions of
// `cleanup`.
auto Cleanup = [](const FormatStyle , StringRef Code,
-std::vector
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sard=C3=A0?= ,
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sard=C3=A0?= ,Pol M
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
RKSimon wrote:
@Destroyerrrocket reverse-ping - are you still working on this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76615
___
cfe-commits
@@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ _mm256_div_ps(__m256 __a, __m256 __b)
/// Compares two 256-bit vectors of [4 x double] and returns the greater
///of each pair of values.
///
+///If either value in a comparison is NaN, returns the value from \a __b.
RKSimon wrote:
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-03-20T16:59:11Z
New Revision: 25d61be8a5e563988661709c5d01f67c06b388e2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25d61be8a5e563988661709c5d01f67c06b388e2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25d61be8a5e563988661709c5d01f67c06b388e2.diff
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-03-20T15:06:19Z
New Revision: 7812fcf3d79ef7fe9ec6bcdfc8fd9143864956cb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7812fcf3d79ef7fe9ec6bcdfc8fd9143864956cb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7812fcf3d79ef7fe9ec6bcdfc8fd9143864956cb.diff
https://github.com/RKSimon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85394
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon requested changes to this pull request.
This patch needs to be cleanly rebased on trunk (force push is OK in PR branchs)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85033
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
LGTM - but @pogo59 needs a headup as it will affect some ongoing documentation
cleanup work
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
RKSimon wrote:
> @RKSimon note this will affect what the tooltips show. Is that okay?
I think so - we're just losing the extra info about -1/0 or 1/0 result values?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83316
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
LGTM - cheers
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84302
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ class HTMLLogger : public Logger {
for (unsigned I = 0; I < CFG.getNumBlockIDs(); ++I) {
std::string Name = blockID(I);
// Rightwards arrow, vertical line
- char ConvergenceMarker[] = u8"\\n\u2192\u007c";
+ char ConvergenceMarker[]
https://github.com/RKSimon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2940,6 +2940,134 @@ _mm_movemask_ps(__m128 __a)
return __builtin_ia32_movmskps((__v4sf)__a);
}
+/* Compare */
+#define _CMP_EQ_OQ0x00 /* Equal (ordered, non-signaling) */
+#define _CMP_LT_OS0x01 /* Less-than (ordered, signaling) */
+#define _CMP_LE_OS0x02
https://github.com/RKSimon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1719,3 +1719,57 @@ __m128i test_mm_xor_si128(__m128i A, __m128i B) {
// CHECK: xor <2 x i64> %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}
return _mm_xor_si128(A, B);
}
+
+__m128d test_mm_cmp_pd_eq_oq(__m128d a, __m128d b) {
RKSimon wrote:
Sorting
@@ -462,12 +462,12 @@ TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_ia32_blendvps256,
"V8fV8fV8fV8f", "ncV:256:", "avx")
TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_ia32_shufpd256, "V4dV4dV4dIi", "ncV:256:", "avx")
TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_ia32_shufps256, "V8fV8fV8fIi", "ncV:256:", "avx")
https://github.com/RKSimon commented:
Should we update the existing SSE/SSE2 cmpeq/cmplt intinsics to use
__builtin_ia32_cmp* instead of __builtin_ia32_cmpeq??/__builtin_ia32_cmplt??
etc?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84136
___
@@ -2613,6 +2614,24 @@ void CGBuilderInserter::InsertHelper(
// called function.
void CodeGenFunction::checkTargetFeatures(const CallExpr *E,
const FunctionDecl *TargetDecl) {
+ // SemaCheking cannot handle below x86 builtins because
@@ -813,3 +813,57 @@ __m128 test_mm_xor_ps(__m128 A, __m128 B) {
// CHECK: xor <4 x i32>
return _mm_xor_ps(A, B);
}
+
+__m128 test_mm_cmp_ps_eq_oq(__m128 a, __m128 b) {
RKSimon wrote:
Move these up (they should be approximately alpha sorted)
@@ -18515,20 +18515,20 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerGlobalAddress(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG ) const {
return LowerGlobalOrExternal(Op, DAG, /*ForCall=*/false);
}
-static SDValue
-GetTLSADDR(SelectionDAG , SDValue Chain, GlobalAddressSDNode *GA,
- SDValue *InGlue,
1 - 100 of 936 matches
Mail list logo