On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 11:27 -0400, Joshua Branson wrote:
>
> Well maybe. I changed the script to this:
>
> [joshua@dobby ~]$ cat $(which hurd)
> #!/bin/bash
> modprobe kvm
> modprobe kvm_intel
> cd ~/programming/gnu/hurd/vm/
> MEMORY=2G
> FILE=debian-hurd-2017-11-01.img
> # If I ever need to
Hi Jonathan,
That is a very good question. Considering the latest revival of
kfreebsd, I think some way to install it would be extremely helpful.
There is an urgent need for users (and porters/bug fixers).
Steven and James, don't you agree?
/me
On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 16:40 -0400, Jonathan Moore
Hi Almudena,
Maybe you can find some ideas from Richard Brauns x15 project:
https://www.sceen.net/x15/
And if you are nice to him he might even help you :D
I've CC:-ed this mail to bug-hurd. Please use that list, help-hurd is
almost dead.
Good luck!
On Sun, 2018-09-23 at 01:26 +0200, Almudena
Source: libdrm
Version: 2.4.94-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hello,
Currently libdrm FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a missing case in
include/drm/drm.h. Attached is a patch, hurd-port.diff, to fix this and
fixes for PATH_MAX issues in in
Source: libdrm
Version: 2.4.94-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hello,
Currently libdrm FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a missing case in
include/drm/drm.h. Attached is a patch, hurd-port.diff, to fix this and
fixes for PATH_MAX issues in in
Hi,
Attached is a refreshed patch for kfreebsd without fuzz. Please apply
this one instead of the previous one in this bug report.
Thanks!Index: libdrm-2.4.94/include/drm/drm.h
===
--- libdrm-2.4.94.orig/include/drm/drm.h
+++
Hi,
Attached is a refreshed patch for kfreebsd without fuzz. Please apply
this one instead of the previous one in this bug report.
Thanks!Index: libdrm-2.4.94/include/drm/drm.h
===
--- libdrm-2.4.94.orig/include/drm/drm.h
+++
Hello,
Please cherry-pick the upstream commit for kfreebsd in 3.12.1 as promised:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/commit/6b7b54d476a297b32f8f1521f3255052b9dda1b6
The corresponding Debian patch is inlined below for your convenience:
--- a/debian/control2018-05-19 10:51:17.0
Source: libdrm
Version: 2.4.94-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-k...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hello,
Currently libdrm FTBFS GNU/kFreeBSD (and GNU/Hurd) due to a missing case in
include/drm/drm.h. Attached is a patch to fix this. This patch is enough to make
libdrm
Source: libdrm
Version: 2.4.94-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-k...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hello,
Currently libdrm FTBFS GNU/kFreeBSD (and GNU/Hurd) due to a missing case in
include/drm/drm.h. Attached is a patch to fix this. This patch is enough to make
libdrm
Hi Mattias,
glibmm2.4 built fine after given back. I asked for help on the #debian-
buildd IRC channel. Maybe you can do the same next time too.
On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 04:53 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I sent this to the wb-team list, but there was no response. But they
> are
Source: llvm-toolchain-6.0
Version: 6.0.1-9
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386
Hello,
Currently llvm-toolchain-6.0 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to missing porting
issues. Attached are three patches to fix this:
lib_Support_Unix_Path.inc.diff
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 01:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > So has the debian patch been submitted in #900240 upstream by you or Petter
> > Reinholdtsen yet? I don't believe so!
>
> I don't think so either, it'd be marked forwarded. That doesn't mean you
> can't help with it.
Regardless who
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 01:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > So has the debian patch been submitted in #900240 upstream by you or Petter
> > Reinholdtsen yet? I don't believe so!
>
> I don't think so either, it'd be marked forwarded. That doesn't mean you
> can't help with it.
Regardless who
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 01:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > So has the debian patch been submitted in #900240 upstream by you or Petter
> > Reinholdtsen yet? I don't believe so!
>
> I don't think so either, it'd be marked forwarded. That doesn't mean you
> can't help with it.
Regardless who
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 00:19 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry Samuel, I asked both you and James Clarke, Cc:ed, for help on this
> > issue and you both said it was not possible to NMU cmake, even if you are
> > both
> > DD's.
>
> For my part, I was not talking about that patch, but
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 01:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > So has the debian patch been submitted in #900240 upstream by you or Petter
> > Reinholdtsen yet? I don't believe so!
>
> I don't think so either, it'd be marked forwarded. That doesn't mean you
> can't help with it.
Regardless who
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 00:19 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry Samuel, I asked both you and James Clarke, Cc:ed, for help on this
> > issue and you both said it was not possible to NMU cmake, even if you are
> > both
> > DD's.
>
> For my part, I was not talking about that patch, but
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 00:19 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry Samuel, I asked both you and James Clarke, Cc:ed, for help on this
> > issue and you both said it was not possible to NMU cmake, even if you are
> > both
> > DD's.
>
> For my part, I was not talking about that patch, but
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 19:46 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le dim. 02 sept. 2018 19:45:19 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-po
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 19:46 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le dim. 02 sept. 2018 19:45:19 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-po
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 19:46 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le dim. 02 sept. 2018 19:45:19 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-po
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 19:46 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le dim. 02 sept. 2018 19:45:19 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-po
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-ports page[1] may
> > provide some objective statistics or reflection on the actual
> > suitability of your architecture's continued inclusion.
> > [1]:
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-ports page[1] may
> > provide some objective statistics or reflection on the actual
> > suitability of your architecture's continued inclusion.
> > [1]:
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-ports page[1] may
> > provide some objective statistics or reflection on the actual
> > suitability of your architecture's continued inclusion.
> > [1]:
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-ports page[1] may
> > provide some objective statistics or reflection on the actual
> > suitability of your architecture's continued inclusion.
> > [1]:
On Sun, 2018-08-26 at 10:40 +0200, Joan Lledó wrote:
> Missatge de Joshua Branson del dia ds., 25
> d’ag. 2018 a les 19:09:
> > Is there something else I could be doing?
>
> It could be worth to take a look at my GSOC blog, it may help you:
> http://darnassus.sceen.net/~jlledom/en/index.html
Hi
On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 13:00 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Dear Hurd and BSD porters,
>
> The latest upload of webrtc-audio-processing in unstable does not
> build on non-linux archs. This new version is required by pulseaudio
> 9, so it will not build as well.
>
> My guess is that the build
On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 13:00 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Dear Hurd and BSD porters,
>
> The latest upload of webrtc-audio-processing in unstable does not
> build on non-linux archs. This new version is required by pulseaudio
> 9, so it will not build as well.
>
> My guess is that the build
On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 13:00 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Dear Hurd and BSD porters,
>
> The latest upload of webrtc-audio-processing in unstable does not
> build on non-linux archs. This new version is required by pulseaudio
> 9, so it will not build as well.
>
> My guess is that the build
PATH_MAX.
>
> https://gitlab.com/psmisc/psmisc/commit/d9ac11f92fdc4e96c818ce9d56e28
> ef40a508336
>
> -Craig
>
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 06:33 Svante Signell > wrote:
> > Source: psmisc
> > Version: 23.1-1
> > Severity: important
> > Tags:
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 11:37 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 12:07 +0200, Svante Signell via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a gmail account and chose to keep deleted messages visible
> > until
> > expunged manually. On version
Source: vulkan
Version: 1.1.73+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org, debian-k...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any
Hello,
Currently vulkan is not available on GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD due to
lack of porting to these architectures.
Source: vulkan
Version: 1.1.73+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org, debian-k...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any
Hello,
Currently vulkan is not available on GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD due to
lack of porting to these architectures.
Hello,
I have a gmail account and chose to keep deleted messages visible until
expunged manually. On version 3.22.4-1 they are kept in the Inbox
folder when deleted but with version 3.28.2-1 they are immediately
moved to the [Gmail]/Trash folder. Any settings I've missed?
Settings:
View -> Show
found 904289 20180822-1
tags 904289 ftbfs
thanks
Hi,
gcc-snapshot 20180822-1 FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to a few outdated
patches for gccgo. All 12 refreshed patches were attached to this bug
report for version 20180721-1. The same patches applies also for
version 20180822-1.
Version 20180822-1
found 904289 20180822-1
tags 904289 ftbfs
thanks
Hi,
gcc-snapshot 20180822-1 FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to a few outdated
patches for gccgo. All 12 refreshed patches were attached to this bug
report for version 20180721-1. The same patches applies also for
version 20180822-1.
Version 20180822-1
Source: galera-3
Version: 25.3.23-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386
Hello,
Currently galera-3 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to that some functions are not
yet available: posix_fadvise, msync and pthread_setschedparam.
Attached are three
Source: galera-3
Version:
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org, debian-k...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any
Hello,
Currently galera-3 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD-any due to
ambiguities on members of struct ifreq. Attached is a patch
Source: unbound
Version: 1.7.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386
Hello,
Currently unbound FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a dependency on libsystemd-
dev for non-linux systems (see #905961) and a missing function:
compat/getentropy_gnu.c,
Source: unbound
Version: 1.7.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org, debian-k...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any
Hello,
Currently unbound FTBFS on GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD-any due to a
dependency on libsystemd-dev. As is well known that
On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 21:09 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Svante Signell]
> > Currently cmake FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a PATH_MAX issue. Attached
> > is
> > the patch path_max.patch also provided by the first attachment in
> > this
> > bug #
Hello,
What about the bugs with patches, e.g. for Hurd and kFreeBSD. Still
somebody needs to NMU this package... You don't seem interested in
fixing bugs to your package, except RC ones.
Not the ideal way Debian maintainers should work with their packages...
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 19:58 +,
Hello,
What about the bugs with patches, e.g. for Hurd and kFreeBSD. Still
somebody needs to NMU this package... You don't seem interested in
fixing bugs to your package, except RC ones.
Not the ideal way Debian maintainers should work with their packages...
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 19:58 +,
Source: psmisc
Version: 23.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
Currently the latest version of psmisc fails to build from source and
is flagged as out-of-date. This is due to usage of PATH_MAX, which is
not defined on GNU/Hurd. The attached
Source: gcc-6
Version: 6.4.0-19
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386
Hello,
Currently gcc-6 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to an isl-bug (#905708) and a
patch for libgo not applying properly. Attached is an updated version
of that patch. Some of
Source: gcc-6
Version: 6.4.0-19
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386
Hello,
Currently gcc-6 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to an isl-bug (#905708) and a
patch for libgo not applying properly. Attached is an updated version
of that patch. Some of
Source: gcc-6
Version: 6.4.0-19
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs, patch
Hi,
gcc-6 FTBFs with the latest version of isl (0.20-1) as well as gcc-7
(see #905539).
Attached is a patch, isl-includes.diff fixing this problem. Attached is
also the diff for debian/rules.patch.
Thanks!---
tags 905539 patch
thanks
On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 21:37 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 20:52 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Source: gcc-7
> > Version: 7.3.0-27
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > User: helm...@debian.org
> > Use
Source: gcc-6
Version: 6.4.0-19
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs, patch
Hi,
gcc-6 FTBFs with the latest version of isl (0.20-1) as well as gcc-7
(see #905539).
Attached is a patch, isl-includes.diff fixing this problem. Attached is
also the diff for debian/rules.patch.
Thanks!---
tags 905539 patch
thanks
On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 21:37 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 20:52 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Source: gcc-7
> > Version: 7.3.0-27
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > User: helm...@debian.org
> > Use
Source: gcc-6
Version: 6.4.0-19
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs, patch
Hi,
gcc-6 FTBFs with the latest version of isl (0.20-1) as well as gcc-7
(see #905539).
Attached is a patch, isl-includes.diff fixing this problem. Attached is
also the diff for debian/rules.patch.
Thanks!---
tags 905539 patch
thanks
On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 21:37 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 20:52 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Source: gcc-7
> > Version: 7.3.0-27
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > User: helm...@debian.org
> > Use
On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 20:52 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: gcc-7
> Version: 7.3.0-27
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: rebootstrap
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> I'm not sure whether you're aware already, but I felt that it was best
> to just document that
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 09:53 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> NEWS for version 2.28
> =
>
> [...]
>
> * Building and running on GNU/Hurd systems now works without out-of-
> tree
> patches.
Finally an upstream glibc that supports GNU/Hurd. Nice work Samuel :)
Source: cmake
Version: 3.11.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Usertags: linux-any, freebsd-any, hurd-any
Hello,
cmake FTBFS with recent a version of libuv1: 1.22.0-x. The build for
most architectures was made 60+ days ago, then with 1.20.3-x. Since
then two upstream versions was released and the
Source: cmake
Version: 3.11.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Usertags: linux-any, freebsd-any, hurd-any
Hello,
cmake FTBFS with recent a version of libuv1: 1.22.0-x. The build for
most architectures was made 60+ days ago, then with 1.20.3-x. Since
then two upstream versions was released and the
retitle 900240 cmake: FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to a PATH_MAX issue
thanks
Hello,
Currently cmake FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a PATH_MAX issue. Attached is
the patch path_max.patch also provided by the first attachment in this
bug #900240, there named path_max.path. With the attached patch and the
Source: cmake
Version: 3.11.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Usertags: linux-any, freebsd-any, hurd-any
Hello,
Currently cmake does FTBFs on kfreebsd-any due to a missing dependency
on libfreebsd-glue-0 and a missing dependency on freebsd-glue,
providing the link:
/usr/lib/libfreebsd-glue.so
On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 09:17 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Svante Signell wrote:
> > The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
> > packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for
> > your effort making this happening
reopen 904476
retitle 904476 Typo in hurd-port patch causes cmake FTBFS on hurd-i386
found 904476 1.22.0-2
tags 904476 patch
affects 904476 cmake
thanks
Hi again,
Currently libuv1 installs a header file in the wrong directory due to a
typo for the install directory of posix.h in the patch
reopen 904476
retitle 904476 Typo in hurd-port patch causes cmake FTBFS on hurd-i386
found 904476 1.22.0-2
tags 904476 patch
affects 904476 cmake
thanks
Hi again,
Currently libuv1 installs a header file in the wrong directory due to a
typo for the install directory of posix.h in the patch
reopen 904503
retitle 904503 libuv1 FTBFS on kfreebsd-any
found 904303 1.22.0-2
tags 904503 patch
affects 904503 cmake
thanks
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
Currently libuv1 FTBFS on kfreebsd-any due to a missing dependency on
reopen 904503
retitle 904503 libuv1 FTBFS on kfreebsd-any
found 904303 1.22.0-2
tags 904503 patch
affects 904503 cmake
thanks
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
Currently libuv1 FTBFS on kfreebsd-any due to a missing dependency on
Source: libuv1
Version: 1.22.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
Currently libuv1 does not build properly on kfreebsd-any due to a
missing linkage of /lib/libfreebsd-glue.so.0, causing an 'undefined
reference to bsd_sendfile' when
Source: libuv1
Version: 1.22.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
Currently libuv1 does not build properly on kfreebsd-any due to a
missing linkage of /lib/libfreebsd-glue.so.0, causing an 'undefined
reference to bsd_sendfile' when
Source: libuv1
Version: 1.22.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd-i386
Hi,
Currently libuv1 FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to a small difference to the
patch hurd-port.diff submitted in #881882. An updated patch is
attached. Additionally, the symbols
found 881569 8.1-2
thanks
On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 11:17 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2018-07-16 9:10 GMT+02:00 Svante Signell :
> > I found out too that gdb 8.1 still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd. Why did you
> > close
> > that bug without applying any of the patches s
found 881569 8.1-1
thanks
On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 03:05 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2018-07-16 2:13 GMT+02:00 Hector Oron :
> > Hello Svante,
> >
> > I have pushed GDB 8.1, but apparently it does not yet have
> > support for Hurd:
> >
On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 12:37 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 05:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 01.07.2018 00:02, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > reopen 897416
> > > found 897416 7.3.0-24, 8.1.0-9
> > > tags 897416 patch
> > >
On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 12:37 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 05:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 01.07.2018 00:02, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > reopen 897416
> > > found 897416 7.3.0-24, 8.1.0-9
> > > tags 897416 patch
> > >
On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 05:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 01.07.2018 00:02, Svante Signell wrote:
> > reopen 897416
> > found 897416 7.3.0-24, 8.1.0-9
> > tags 897416 patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi, the patch by Matthias was not enough to make gcc-7,8 to bu
On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 05:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 01.07.2018 00:02, Svante Signell wrote:
> > reopen 897416
> > found 897416 7.3.0-24, 8.1.0-9
> > tags 897416 patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi, the patch by Matthias was not enough to make gcc-7,8 to bu
reopen 897416
found 897416 7.3.0-24, 8.1.0-9
tags 897416 patch
thanks
Hi, the patch by Matthias was not enough to make gcc-7,8 to build
properly. Three configure files were needed to be recreated from their
corresponding configure.ac. Additionally, this patch use x86_64*-*-gnu*
to also cover the
reopen 897416
found 897416 7.3.0-24, 8.1.0-9
tags 897416 patch
thanks
Hi, the patch by Matthias was not enough to make gcc-7,8 to build
properly. Three configure files were needed to be recreated from their
corresponding configure.ac. Additionally, this patch use x86_64*-*-gnu*
to also cover the
Hello,
Where are the browsable packages for gcc-* now, when salsa is in use?
>From the web package for gcc-8:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gcc-8
Click on VCS: Browse
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc-8/
Server not found
Click on VCS: QA
PING!!!
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 15:34 -0400, fsmithred wrote:
> Refracta no-dbus build (experiment)
>
> The subject of running without dbus comes up from time to time in
> various places. I decided to try it and see how far I could get. I
> started with a debootstrap install of devuan ascii, pinned dbus to
On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 20:21 +0200, Almudena Garcia wrote:
> Ok, I found the warning what you refers
>
> ../kern/thread.h:401:42: warning: implicit declaration of function
> ‘cpu_number’; did you mean ‘cpu_idle’? [-Wimplicit-function-
> declaration]
>
> After check the cpu_number.h file, feels
On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 23:53 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le lun. 11 juin 2018 23:30:23 +0200, a ecrit:
> >
> > Building from source fails with:
> > make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'lwip/priv/tcpip_priv.h',
> > needed by
> > 'lwip-uti
On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 23:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since the lwip package got accepted, I reuploaded the hurd package
> with
> the additional dependency, which thus brings us a new translator,
> /hurd/lwip, which you can start playing with!
Building from source fails with:
reopen -1
found 899267 2.5.1-2
thanks
Hello,
Unfortunately the patch 0006-fix-kfreebsd-build.patch was not applied,
resulting in a failing build. I'm attaching that file again, now named
0007-fix-kfreebsd-build.patch
Thanks!
On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 21:45 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Hi,
Maybe you should try with qemu instead of virtualbox. The problems
could be there, not in the GNU/Hurd images. And BTW: Have you checked
the md5sums of your downloaded images?
HTH!
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 21:29 +0200, Almudena Garcia wrote:
> Another test: Debian GNU/Hurd 2017 NETINSTALL
Source: heimdal
Version: 1.7.5.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
Currently heimdal fails to build on GNU/Hurd due to usage of MAXHOSTNAMELEN
where it is not defined. The attached patch solves this problem by using
MaxHostNameLen
Sorry, sent to the wrong email address. Now you know about this bug report
anyway ;)
On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 21:25 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Source: heimdal
> Version: 1.7.5.0+dfsg-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
> User
Source: heimdal
Version: 1.7.5.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
Currently heimdal fails to build on GNU/Hurd due to usage of MAXHOSTNAMELEN
where it is not defined. The attached patch solves this problem by using
MaxHostNameLen
On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 22:45 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 01:55:22AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Aaron M. Ucko, on mer. 28 févr. 2018 19:47:40 -0500, wrote:
> > > login-utils/su-common.c:1427:3: warning: implicit declaration of
> > > function 'pty_init_slave';
On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 22:45 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 01:55:22AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Aaron M. Ucko, on mer. 28 févr. 2018 19:47:40 -0500, wrote:
> > > login-utils/su-common.c:1427:3: warning: implicit declaration of
> > > function 'pty_init_slave';
Hi again,
Attached are updated patches for directory debian/tests/excludes/kfreeebsd-
i386.
Thanks!--- /dev/null 2018-05-22 05:17:44.0 +0200
+++ b/debian/tests/excludes/kfreebsd-i386/TestGemSpecification.rb 2018-05-22 01:29:57.476472000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# Actual is one day earlier
Attached are updated patches for directoriy debian/tests/excludes/kfreeebsd-
amd64 with the a/ removed from /dev/null and s/exclude/excludes/
kfreebsd-i386 needs one more file in debian/tests/exclude to build properly. An
updated kfree-i386.diff will be submitted soon.
Thanks!--- /dev/null
Attached are updated patches for directoriy debian/tests/excludes/kfreeebsd-
amd64 with the a/ removed from /dev/null and s/exclude/excludes/
kfreebsd-i386 needs one more file in debian/tests/exclude to build properly. An
updated kfree-i386.diff will be submitted soon.
Thanks!--- /dev/null
Source: ruby2.5
Version: 2.5.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
ruby2.5 FTBFS on kFreebsd-any due to not being ported to that architecture for a
long time.
Attached are patches for debian/tests/exclude/kfreebsd-{amd64,i386}/
and source
Source: ruby2.5
Version: 2.5.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
ruby2.5 FTBFS on kFreebsd-any due to not being ported to that architecture for a
long time.
Attached are patches for debian/tests/exclude/kfreebsd-{amd64,i386}/
and source
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 09:27 -0400, Trevor Curtis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I took a crack at installing on KVM via the link James supplied [1].
> All seemed to go well until the installing-Grub-phase.
>
> On tty3: http://somaradio.ca/~tcurtis/misc/kfreebsd_installer.png
>
> Any suggestions on how I'd
On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 23:54 +, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi again,
> On 17/05/18 21:36, aitor_czr wrote:
> > I' ve just pushed the latest code of the popupmenu:
> >
> > https://git.devuan.org/aitor_czr/popupmenu/tree/master
> >
> Here you are the .deb packages:
>
> http://gnuinos.org/popupmenu/
Source: imagemagick
Version: 6.9.9.39+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch, i386
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
imagemagick currently FTBFS on any-i386 architectures:
i386, hurd-i386 and kfrebsd-i386.
The attached patch:
Source: gcc-6
Version: 6.4.0-17
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
gcc-6 has been FTBFS since 6.4.0-12 on GNU/Hurd due to an outdated patch for
gccgo, caused by the upgrade of glibc from 2.25 to 2.26+
Attached is an updated patch:
Source: gcc-6
Version: 6.4.0-17
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
gcc-6 has been FTBFS since 6.4.0-12 on GNU/Hurd due to an outdated patch for
gccgo, caused by the upgrade of glibc from 2.25 to 2.26+
Attached is an updated patch:
On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 23:45 +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> On 11 May 2018, at 23:29, Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 22:11 +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> > > On 11 May 2018, at 21:58, Svante Signell
> > > <svante.
601 - 700 of 4854 matches
Mail list logo
