Re: [PATCH] xfree86: bail on misformed acpi strings (#73227)

2013-02-25 Thread Ted Felix
On 02/23/2013 08:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:41:59 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: X.Org Bug 73227 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73227 Bug number looks like a typo? Maybe that was supposed to be https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55329 56523

Bug#701206: acpid: Mic mute button on Thinkpad X230 is not recognized

2013-02-22 Thread Ted Felix
On 02/22/2013 10:00 PM, Yevgeny Kosarzhevsky wrote: when I run acpi_listen and press MicMute button I get only ^@ output, no codes recognized. What does kacpimon report for that button? You'll need to kill acpid for kacpimon to work. Check the man page for more. Ted. -- To

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Tags (was Re: ROSEGARDEN 13.02 RELEASED)

2013-02-19 Thread Ted Felix
On 02/19/2013 12:07 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: If you want me to take care of doing this in the future, the easiest and most helpful thing would be for you go edit scripts/make-release-tarball and tack something in there to do this automagically at the end of the script. I had no idea

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] ROSEGARDEN 13.02 RELEASED

2013-02-18 Thread Ted Felix
On 02/18/2013 04:06 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: == ROSEGARDEN 13.02, codename Handel RELEASED == Is there a way to tag releases in SVN? Can you add tagging the release in SVN to your build process, Michael? Or are there already tags somewhere that I am missing? Tags would make

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] ROSEGARDEN 13.02 RELEASED

2013-02-18 Thread Ted Felix
On 02/18/2013 08:00 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: Is there a way to tag releases in SVN? Having been here for over 10 years now, I have no clue what tag is for, or why it matters. It appears that svn copy is the key. Making a copy from trunk to tags will do it.

[Rosegarden-devel] Tags (was Re: ROSEGARDEN 13.02 RELEASED)

2013-02-18 Thread Ted Felix
On 02/18/2013 08:12 AM, Ted Felix wrote: It appears that svn copy is the key. Making a copy from trunk to tags will do it. Ok, I tagged all the releases back to 10.04. I made the best guess I could by examining the dates on the commits, so it is possible that these are off by +/- one

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Crash while changing number of submasters

2013-02-10 Thread Ted Felix
On 02/10/2013 10:21 AM, Tim Munro wrote: I've dealt with the issue by cobbling together an ugly, complicated copy constructor for the PluginContainer class. The resulting code appears to work, but I have no idea what sort of memory leaks or other future train wrecks I might have introduced

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Crash while changing number of submasters

2013-02-10 Thread Ted Felix
On 02/10/2013 06:53 PM, Tim Munro wrote: Also, make sure you declare an operator=(). You can make it private to prevent anyone from using it. You can also leave it undefined so you'll get a linker error in case the class itself uses it. For what it's worth, I did declare a private,

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] The very latest version of Rosegarden cannot export '.mid' files

2013-01-10 Thread Ted Felix
On 01/10/2013 12:51 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: This morning, I obtained the svn source for the latest Rosegarden code (I was careful to do that this time), revision 13178. Unfortunately, it did not build successfully. Just to be sure, try the following in the rg directory: $ svn update

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] The very latest version of Rosegarden cannot export '.mid' files

2013-01-10 Thread Ted Felix
On 01/10/2013 01:36 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: It appears your WIKI on using the Eclipse IDE to work on Rosegarden (which I'm using, except I get the source the way you normally get the source, since I do not have a SourceForge user-ID), does not include the svn update step. I just threw

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] The very latest version of Rosegarden cannot export '.mid' files

2013-01-10 Thread Ted Felix
On 01/10/2013 06:55 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: I followed your instructions, and the build succeeded this time. The key thing that I noticed was that configure.ac had changed recently (I saw it go by when I did an svn update). That requires a complete rebuild from the very start (make

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Return not working, and how do we want it to work?

2012-12-14 Thread Ted Felix
On 12/14/2012 05:35 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: I found it the old behavior convenient and I still find myself automatically reaching for Return. What do others prefer? My opinion isn't worth much as I don't actually use rosegarden, however, I find myself hitting the space bar for play

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] 12.12 release plans...

2012-12-07 Thread Ted Felix
On 12/07/2012 06:47 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: I finally got around to sifting through the bug tracker and looking at all the 12.12 marked stuff. It's all either fixed or postponed except Can't record Beethoven and cppcheck report. Don't wait on those two. They are ongoing and may

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Merged refactor-mapped-buffer

2012-11-21 Thread Ted Felix
Ted, I had to change some of your comments Looks good, Tom. I skimmed through all of this and I did see the things I had made mention of in a previous commit. Looks like you rewrote the comments to make a lot more sense. (Though, honestly, it's been so long, that code looks really

[Rosegarden-devel] Bug #1352 fixed

2012-11-07 Thread Ted Felix
Bug 1352 can be closed now (or set to pending whatever the current process is). I don't have bug admin privileges anymore or I would do this myself. Ted. -- LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Status: #1350 Can't Record Beethoven

2012-10-26 Thread Ted Felix
On 10/26/2012 05:52 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: On 10/25/2012 07:58 AM, Ted Felix wrote: updateRefreshStatuses() is getting called about 388 times per second. Holy crap, Batman! Indeed. We're looking at almost 900 calls per second to Segment notification related functions while

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Status: #1350 Can't Record Beethoven

2012-10-26 Thread Ted Felix
On 10/26/2012 08:20 AM, Ted Felix wrote: I don't think SegmentRefresh is the best solution, however... Correction: By SegmentRefresh, I mean either RefreshStatus or SegmentRefreshStatus. Ted. -- Everyone hates

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Status: #1350 Can't Record Beethoven

2012-10-25 Thread Ted Felix
On 10/25/2012 04:16 AM, Chris Cannam wrote: (I don't have the program in front of me atm either, and I can't actually remember offhand whether we don't show them at all or update them in batches -- either way we shouldn't be having a callback per-note and no edit commands should be firing)

[Rosegarden-devel] Status: #1350 Can't Record Beethoven

2012-10-24 Thread Ted Felix
Well, this is becoming quite the little nightmare. The executive overview goes something like this Rosegarden was designed to be a MIDI editor. Then someone decided to add MIDI sequencing to it. But what's ok for a MIDI editor (very CPU intensive updates in response to infrequent

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Diagram: Latencies in Rosegarden

2012-09-29 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/29/2012 04:58 AM, Holger Marzen wrote: I know that there are talented coders actively working on bugs. I would love to work on this as it is right up my alley: Real-time and difficult. However, I'm in the middle of other difficult issues and have very little (real) time. What would

[Rosegarden-devel] ohloh

2012-09-29 Thread Ted Felix
Michael, if you have some time, can you point ohloh to the new repo? The pretty graphs keep me motivated. No hurry. Thanks. Ted. -- How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] ohloh

2012-09-29 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/29/2012 07:45 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: I added the new repo. I've left the original one for now. See what this looks like after they get a chance to crawl the new repo The numbers look a bit wrong. It's inflated my commits quite a bit. Maybe it's double-accounting? Looks

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Discussion: Rosegarden's Latency Compensation Model

2012-09-28 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/27/2012 10:32 PM, Holger Marzen wrote: Is there still some documentation? Documentation is kept on the wiki. http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/wiki/start Ted. -- Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their

[Bug 1019400] Re: Hang on MIDI import and record

2012-09-26 Thread Ted Felix
Thanks for the fix. I've tested this twice now and it appears to be working fine in precise. BTW, the upstream bug tracker just changed and the new bug number is 1331. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Rosegarden-devel] Ubuntu: Three Month Turnaround

2012-09-26 Thread Ted Felix
It took Ubuntu three months to respond to my request to apply a patch to rosegarden. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rosegarden/+bug/1019400 Don't think I'll be bothering with that again. A PPA has got to be faster/easier. Ted.

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ubuntu: Three Month Turnaround

2012-09-26 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/26/2012 10:04 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: I am wondering, where Ubuntu finally (after 3 months) applied the patch to Rosegarden, if that means that an update will be coming out with that fix to level 12.04, Yes, there will be an update to Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise) that will include this

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Are we ready for the new SourceForge?

2012-09-23 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/23/2012 04:46 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: You're on the ball, aren't you Ted? Apparently not. The URLs I used are read-only. To checkout a version that can be committed you have to do this: svn checkout svn+ssh://use...@svn.code.sf.net/p/rosegarden/code/trunk/rosegarden

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] UI-Patch, restore of plugin-settings

2012-09-16 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/16/2012 08:04 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: Does anyone remember the status of this particular issue? Yeah, I added it to my bug report 3560849. Tim was concerned that it wasn't a safe patch to apply. I'll have a look at it eventually. Ted.

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Are we ready for the new SourceForge?

2012-09-15 Thread Ted Felix
Fine with me, my local copy has no changes. If it did, I would just update, make a patch, and apply it once we get to the other side. Ted. On 09/15/2012 06:49 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: On 09/15/2012 04:50 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: I put all of my piddle projects in for

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Are we ready for the new SourceForge?

2012-09-14 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/14/2012 02:57 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: As I recall, this move is going to wipe out our bug and feature request trackers. The only thing I would need would be the open bugs from the last year. I think that's only 14 bug reports. From 3427608 onward. I can certainly help

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Good catch, and GC

2012-09-13 Thread Ted Felix
But IMO garbage collection still has a lot to offer us. I have no experience with garbage collection, but I would be concerned about something that can be unpredictable in a time-critical system like rosegarden. My impression is that near-real-time and garbage collection do not mix. Ted.

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Status...

2012-09-11 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/11/2012 08:53 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: I'm still working on course-ware, so nothing is going to ship in the near future. That means fixing the problems is a higher priority. Ok, then I'll take a look at Beethoven (and hopefully a whole host of recording issues) next. Since Lubuntu

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Status...

2012-09-11 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/11/2012 09:34 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: The case where input events get missed when recording is (of the problems not yet fixed) the highest priority, which I think the Beethoven piece is a part of. Ok, there were two test cases where notes were dropped. One was very serious in that

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] version control repositories

2012-09-07 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/07/2012 11:38 AM, Chris Cannam wrote: So, what do you think? Developers please please pick one of the following -- If Michael ever really quits this project, I vote for git or Mercurial. I don't know Mercurial, so I don't really have a preference between it and git. I do know git a

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Refactored the mapper classes

2012-09-06 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/06/2012 07:52 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: I've moved the read lock in MappedEventBuffer::peek into MappedBufMetaIterator functions so that it covers the entire scope during which the MappedEvent pointer is exposed. It's not perfect, because caller has to know to do that, but it's much

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] concerning bug #3560849

2012-09-05 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/05/2012 12:06 PM, Tim Munro wrote: I think I might have accidentally fixed this a few months ago, while tackling a similar bug in my own copy of Rosegarden: Thanks a bunch for this. I've copied it over to the bug tracker as the mailing lists on sourceforge are a real pain to use as

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[12965] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui/seqmanager

2012-08-09 Thread Ted Felix
Status update. I've whittled down the Beethoven acid test to a small MIDI file that causes lots of trouble for rg. I've opened a bug report (3555441) for this and will continue to update status there: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3555441group_id=4932atid=104932 My

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-07-16 Thread Ted Felix
I have been wondering regarding the missing notes problem, particularly with the 'acid-test' case, if increasing the ALSA client pool size might solve it. The dropped notes problem is now fixed in revision 12959. Turns out it was a bug that was made worse by slower computers. So it would

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-07-12 Thread Ted Felix
I've opened a bug report (*3542166)*on sourceforge for the dropped notes problem: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3542166group_id=4932atid=104932 Shouldn't be too hard to figure out. I've also successfully reproduced a crash. Looks like a wild pointer. While recording,

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-07-04 Thread Ted Felix
On 6/30/2012 5:18 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: By the way, the acid test piece is the 3rd movement of Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata, which I originally put in note-wise, using software on a Radio Shack Color Computer, which I recorded to the Roland D20 synthesizer's onboard sequence editor. I

[Bug 1019400] [NEW] Hang on MIDI import and record

2012-06-29 Thread Ted Felix
Public bug reported: In upstream revision 12743 of rosegarden, an endless loop situation related to MIDI import and recording was fixed. A lubuntu user reported this bug upstream recently. The attached patch is the fix. Please add this to Ubuntu's rosegarden build for Precise. (Quantal should

[Bug 1019400] Re: Hang on MIDI import and record

2012-06-29 Thread Ted Felix
** Patch added: upstream patch revision 12743 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019400/+attachment/3208170/+files/rg12743.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019400 Title: Hang

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-06-29 Thread Ted Felix
I tried out Ubuntu-Studio 12.04, which has the low-latency kernel, and learned more about the problem. Thanks for the additional info. Here's my plan for the moment (when I have a moment)... I'm going to try filing a bug report with Ubuntu to get the patch for the hang in there.

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-06-23 Thread Ted Felix
On 6/22/2012 1:32 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: The following packages will be REMOVED: jackd2 jackd2-firewire libjack-jackd2-0 Not this again! I've run into this before. Turns out there are two versions of JACK. Version 1 is written in C, 2 in C++. 2 offers a few extra features, but I

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters REPRODUCED PROBLEM IN 12.12

2012-06-23 Thread Ted Felix
On 6/23/2012 1:37 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: I installed Rosegarden 12.12 there without any problems - congratulations on your straight-forward, accurate, and detailed instructions. Wow. I hadn't actually tried my exact instructions because I have a script that installs all the rosegarden

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-06-22 Thread Ted Felix
On 6/20/2012 9:44 AM, Ted Felix wrote: This is my suspicion at this point. Hoping to get some time to work on this. Ok, finally got some time to look at this. I was unable to reproduce the hang. I suspect that this was fixed back in January. We might be able to work on getting

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-06-20 Thread Ted Felix
I would be happy to file the bug reports, except that I have been unable to figure out how to do it. The best place to file bug reports for any piece of software is upstream. IOW, the developer's website. Bug reports with distros (like lubuntu) tend to get ignored, especially for fringe

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-06-13 Thread Ted Felix
On 6/13/2012 1:27 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: I have come up with a way for you to reproduce the problem on your system. Wow. Thanks for all this. I'll see if I can squeeze some time in on this soon. That repeating error message was related to the quantizer getting confused with notes of

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-06-11 Thread Ted Felix
On 6/5/2012 4:41 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: WARNING: SegmentNotationHelper::makeNoteViable(): No valid split for event of duration 896 at 107520 (split duration 960), ignoring remainder WARNING: This is probably a bug; fix required Boy, that looks familiar. I've been in that code and fixed

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden (11.11.42) Crash, using recording filters

2012-06-05 Thread Ted Felix
On 5/22/2012 3:09 PM, Aere Greenway wrote: I then clicked the stop (the filled-in square) toolbar button of the Rosegarden window, and the Rosegarden window immediately disappeared (I assume from the crash). I cannot get two MIDI keyboards to crash rg. Here are the steps I took: 1.

[Bug 995916] Re: No launcher icon or Alt+Tab entry for Gimp windows

2012-05-17 Thread Ted Felix
Confirmed with rosegarden and kstars. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995916 Title: No launcher icon or Alt+Tab entry for Gimp windows To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 152607] Re: Adding a marker in Rosegarden rename the previous one

2012-05-17 Thread Ted Felix
Tried reproducing this with the latest version of rg (upstream from svn). I could not. I think this has been fixed (probably during the qt4 upgrade a couple of years back). I believe this bug can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Kickstarter

2012-05-10 Thread Ted Felix
On 5/8/2012 11:52 PM, Daren Beattie wrote: Does anyone have experience with smart pointers? shared_ptr works for me: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.htm http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr But I do try to avoid it by writing code that doesn't

[Rosegarden-devel] MusicXML import and instruments

2012-04-27 Thread Ted Felix
Minor potential issue... MusicXML import doesn't seem to assign instruments. I saved a three track sequence (piano lh, piano rh, flute) as MusicXML, then I imported it. All three tracks came back as instrument #1 which was piano. This might be a limitation of MusicXML? If so, not a

[Rosegarden-devel] assertion: src/sound/ControlBlock.cpp:408

2012-04-23 Thread Ted Felix
Bring up rg and select the first audio track. The assertion message: rosegarden: src/sound/ControlBlock.cpp:408: void Rosegarden::TrackInfo::makeChannelReady(Rosegarden::Studio): Assertion `instrument-getType() == Instrument::Midi' failed. Ted.

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] recording with the latest build

2012-04-16 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/15/2012 4:46 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: Somewhat dirty, in that it assumes all instruments are fixed. I didn't see a good way to deal with playing on a track with auto or audio instruments. I tried it out and it works fine for tracks in fixed mode. Maybe when an auto mode

Bug#642227: WARNING: SegmentNotationHelper::makeNoteViable(): No valid split for event

2012-04-15 Thread Ted Felix
Thanks for the bug report. r12743 (Jan 8, 2012) of rosegarden fixes a similar bug. If you can attach a sample MIDI file that causes the problem, I can test it against the latest source. Ted. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#642227: WARNING: SegmentNotationHelper::makeNoteViable(): No valid split for event

2012-04-15 Thread Ted Felix
Thanks for the bug report. r12743 (Jan 8, 2012) of rosegarden fixes a similar bug. If you can attach a sample MIDI file that causes the problem, I can test it against the latest source. Ted. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] auto/fixed channel bug, old sequences

2012-04-12 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/12/2012 12:05 AM, Ted Felix wrote: Ok, I put a few SEQUENCER_DEBUG statements in ChannelManager::doInsert(). In every case, every time doInsert() is called, even the very first time, m_triedToGetChannel is found to be true which causes the routine to exit. Thus, the channel never gets

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] auto/fixed channel bug, old sequences

2012-04-12 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/12/2012 1:33 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: Another long shot hypothesis: You said earlier that you had set instruments to fixed and that worked. On the document you're working on, how many instruments are fixed? Rather, how many channels do they occupy? I have the problem with only

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] auto/fixed channel bug, old sequences

2012-04-12 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/12/2012 3:23 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: Clearly something is drastically wrong and varies by setup. I just can't see how. Got it... Looks like the problem is static initialization order: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.14 The following lines from

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] auto/fixed channel bug, old sequences

2012-04-11 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/10/2012 3:31 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: Anything else I should try? Path through the code to follow? I'm not sure what to path to tell you, since I'd be following it myself and that would duplicate our effort. Understood. I just have a feeling that I'm the only one that can

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] auto/fixed channel bug, old sequences

2012-04-11 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/11/2012 4:14 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: For lack of anything better to compare, I'll mention that I'm running Kubntu 10.04 64-bit. Maybe you're running 32-bit and there's some stupid MAX_INT bug or something. Hopefully. I'm running 32-bit Ubuntu 11.10. 32-bit might indeed be a

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] auto/fixed channel bug, old sequences

2012-04-11 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/11/2012 8:35 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: Here's a long shot, but easily tested: Does it depend on whether the bank and program boxes on Instrument parameters are checked? Does it either cause the same problem for fixed or fix it for auto? This has no effect. I tried every

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] auto/fixed channel bug, old sequences

2012-04-10 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/9/2012 10:32 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: I think we intended for melodic instruments to float by default, so the behavior you're seeing is expected, I think. I wonder why it isn't working? Ok, so it should be working for me. Then let me detail the steps to reproduce and what

[Rosegarden-devel] auto/fixed channel bug, old sequences

2012-04-09 Thread Ted Felix
I loaded some old sequences and I noticed that they do not play. Turns out the auto/fixed switch is set to auto for old sequences (usually) and that is the problem. I set the switch to fixed and all is well. To prevent user confusion, I think we need to get the following rule in place:

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Logical instruments merged

2012-03-22 Thread Ted Felix
On 3/21/2012 12:19 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: I have attached those outputs. This was perfect. Thanks. I reviewed all of it and it looks fine. Looks like the only clash was with a compiler warning that I fixed. But your final fix for that is equivalent to mine. How'd you get a

Bug#664705: acpid: weird socket permissions

2012-03-20 Thread Ted Felix
On 3/19/2012 9:18 PM, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: after the upgrade srwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 mar 20 02:15 /var/run/acpid.socket before the upgrade srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 mar 20 02:15 /var/run/acpid.socket Thanks for the bug report. I've verified this and should have a fix by the end of the day.

Bug#664705: acpid: weird socket permissions

2012-03-20 Thread Ted Felix
Patch to 2.0.15 attached. This fixes the fchmod() issue and should give the correct permissions. The -g option was a bit more tricky to fix. I ended up having to go back to chown() and that seems to work ok. No matter where I put fchown(), it just didn't work. If you can give it

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Logical instruments merged

2012-03-20 Thread Ted Felix
On 3/20/2012 1:19 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: OK, I can send you the files if that helps. But it's just the current version of trunk, ie what you'd see anyways. I just want to see the changes I made, then the changes you made to those. With git: git log -p file1 git log -p file2

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Logical instruments merged

2012-03-19 Thread Ted Felix
On 3/19/2012 6:13 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: The only squeaky point was merging CompositionMapper.cpp and SequenceManager.cpp where Ted and I have both made changes, sometimes to the same function. I think the merge preserves the senses of both sets of changes. I mention it because it's

Bug#663249: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#663249: acpid: fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, O_NONBLOCK) should be fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK)

2012-03-14 Thread Ted Felix
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:28:14PM +0100, Luciano Bello wrote: Is it a security problem? Given that F_SETFD != F_SETFL, I would say that this is a security problem. A userspace program can cause acpid to stop processing by blocking on a socket. Ted. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re rosegarden's license.

2012-02-26 Thread Ted Felix
On 2/26/2012 8:10 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: On Sunday, February 26, 2012, Dave Plater wrote: ...Rosegarden has been marked GPLv2 or later for as long as I've been maintaining it for openSUSE but when I submitted 11.11.42 to factory the legal department license check said it was plain

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Fully fixed the recording bug

2012-02-17 Thread Ted Felix
On 2/17/2012 7:04 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: Oh well, Ted Felix will probably find and fix all of them eventually. It's a lot of code. It will take several decades. But I will prevail. Ted. -- Virtualization

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[12798] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui/editors/segment

2012-02-04 Thread Ted Felix
On 2/2/2012 4:23 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: It's all just stupidly complicated, isn't it Ted? I've spent many days on TrackLabel, and it is really tough. However, it looks like what it is trying to do is actually really simple. I'm on the verge of doing the actual rewrite and it looks

Bug#656675: acpid(8) manpage mentions /proc/acpi/event

2012-01-24 Thread Ted Felix
On 1/20/2012 3:39 PM, Adam Heath wrote: The manpage for acpid(8) mentions /proc/acpi/event. That file doesn't exist in 3.2(probably 3.1, maybe others). I'm guessing that the file hasn't actually existed for a large number of kernel revisions. Since debian is going to be shipping a 3.x

Bug#656676: acpi_listen(8) manpage has pointless See Also section

2012-01-24 Thread Ted Felix
), sh(1), socket(2), connect(2) +acpid(8) .SH AUTHORS +Ted Felix (www.tedfelix.com) +.br Tim Hockin thoc...@hockin.org .br Luca Capello l...@pca.it

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] The remove Segment fix

2012-01-23 Thread Ted Felix
But it actually might be avoidable. Segment is now a QObject, so it emits the signal destroyed just before it is destroyed. You could connect that signal to CompositionMapper and do CompositionMapper::removeSegment before the segment is actually freed, if you think it's worth doing. I

[Rosegarden-devel] Eclipse Files in SVN

2012-01-15 Thread Ted Felix
Hopefully my last commit removing .cproject didn't mess anybody up. I've just noticed that there are a number of Eclipse related files in svn. I think it would be best to remove all of them as the choice of IDE and how it is configured should be up to each developer. I'd like to propose

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[12766] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui/application

2012-01-14 Thread Ted Felix
these alternative keywords [and, or, not] have been part of the C++ standard for a long time Thanks, Michael. I've been coding in C++ for almost 20 years now and completely missed this. I'll have to go do some research myself and get caught up. Ted.

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] ROSEGARDEN 11.11.42, codename Edelweiss RELEASED

2011-12-16 Thread Ted Felix
On 12/12/2011 3:30 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: I just figured I'd release it in its original state one time and see how it went over. If nobody complains, using a 50 ms timer really does bring about a dramatic reduction in CPU usage. If people do complain, there's room to play with it.

[Rosegarden-devel] MIDI Record Performance

2011-12-03 Thread Ted Felix
I've been working on tracking down Rosegarden performance issues when recording MIDI. I think I've identified the problem, and unfortunately, it is rather pervasive. It will require quite a bit of time and effort to fix. My time is pretty limited when working on rg, so I anticipate this may

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] ROSEGARDEN 11.11.11, codename Edelweiss RELEASED

2011-11-17 Thread Ted Felix
On 11/12/2011 7:00 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: == ROSEGARDEN 11.11.1, codename Edelweiss RELEASED == Rosegarden 11.11.11 is a minor point release that includes additional translations, and one notable change by Ted Felix that might offer a tangible reduction in CPU usage without

[Bug 883560] [NEW] C++ static const int and the ternary operator

2011-10-29 Thread Ted Felix
Public bug reported: Try building this with optimizations off: // gcc c++ bug: static const int member and the ternary operator // gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) 4.6.1 // Build with optimizations off. //g++ -O0 class A { public: static const int I = 0; static const int J

[Bug 883560] Re: C++ static const int and the ternary operator

2011-10-29 Thread Ted Felix
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883560 Title: C++ static const int and the ternary operator To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [12366] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui/general/ ProjectPackager.cpp

2011-08-29 Thread Ted Felix
On 8/28/2011 11:17 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: On Sunday, August 28, 2011, Ted Felix wrote: The names in usedAudioFiles were all full path names while the names in theaudio tags were just base names... the .rg files that were created (for me anyway) had all theaudio tags removed

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [12366] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui/general/ ProjectPackager.cpp

2011-08-28 Thread Ted Felix
On 8/28/2011 12:26 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: Import/Export Rosegarden Package Fixes - Fixed a bug where all audio files would be lost in the .rg file when exporting to a rosegarden package (.rgp). Would you mind giving a bit of explanation what the bug was, and what was required to

Bug#635219: acpid: excessive power script invocation

2011-07-26 Thread Ted Felix
On 7/23/2011 6:34 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: Shouldn't acpid somehow avoid calling the same script for the same event over and over? acpid's only purpose is to call scripts in response to acpi events. It is up to the script to avoid doing unnecessary things that result in writing to the

Bug#620387: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#620387: acpid: Keys Fn-F1 to Fn-F9 (vol mute, vol down, vol up, screen switch, bright up/down)

2011-04-05 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/5/2011 12:41 AM, Hannes Calitz wrote: It seems the only problem is detecting the hotkeys on F1 to F9. Maybe then not an acpi problem but rather a hal or xorg problem? Usually, this is a kernel driver issue. It's easy to eliminate acpid as the cause simply by running a window manager

[Bug 749816] [NEW] dssi-dev pkg dependencies incorrect

2011-04-03 Thread Ted Felix
Public bug reported: The dssi-dev pkg in Maverick depends on libjack-dev. If the user attempts to install dssi-dev with JACK2 installed, this causes a back- leveling of JACK to JACK1. However, dssi does not specifically depend on JACK1. In Natty, this has been fixed. dssi-dev now depends on

Bug#620387: acpid: Keys Fn-F1 to Fn-F9 (vol mute, vol down, vol up, screen switch, bright up/down)

2011-04-01 Thread Ted Felix
Are you running a window manager like KDE, GNOME, Xfce... when this happens? Ted. On 4/1/2011 12:01 PM, HCalitz wrote: Package: acpid Version: 1:2.0.8-3 Severity: normal The Fn-F1 to Fn-F9 keys does not work anymore. They used to work fine until the last update. There may be a problem

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] ROSEGARDEN 10.10 RELEASED

2010-11-10 Thread Ted Felix
On 11/3/2010 10:11 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: == ROSEGARDEN 10.10, codename Betty Prior RELEASED == Is the string freeze lifted? Ted. -- The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] ROSEGARDEN 10.10 RELEASED

2010-11-10 Thread Ted Felix
, Ted Felix wrote: Is the string freeze lifted? Yes, but if you're going to make string changes, I'd appreciate it if you'd do so with Qt 4.7 or later. I'd like to avoid any chance, however remote, of our translations getting mangled again. Are you planning to work on anything

Bug#600564: add support for more buttons

2010-10-18 Thread Ted Felix
Thanks for this. I'll get it into my next release. Ted. On 10/18/2010 4:18 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: Package: acpid Version: 1:2.0.6-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream patch Hello, I think that it is reasonable to add support for the very common CD play/pause and related buttons

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] What to do about resizing segments?

2010-10-01 Thread Ted Felix
I just committed revision 12057 to the repository. r12057 is working quite well. I can do non-destructive adjustment of a segment's size via its right edge, and segments are non-destructively truncated by the composition. This is great. Now the not-so-good news. There are a couple

Bug#598198: acpid: superfluous logging

2010-09-28 Thread Ted Felix
Try the attached patch. diff -N -r -U 10 -x '*.o' -x '*~' -x '.*' -x '*.out' -x CVS -x '*.moc' acpid-2.0.6/event.c acpid/event.c --- acpid-2.0.6/event.c 2010-03-28 10:00:04.0 -0400 +++ acpid/event.c 2010-09-27 18:26:48.0 -0400 @@ -115,20 +115,26 @@ } /*

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] What to do about resizing segments?

2010-09-28 Thread Ted Felix
I vote for keeping the non-destructive resize feature, mainly because I've spent many hours making sure that copy/paste range handled it properly. It does give the user more power in that they don't have to use undo. And if they are several edits down from the adjustment of the end time,

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[11984] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui/application/ RosegardenMainViewWidget.cpp

2010-07-03 Thread Ted Felix
Testing this particular one, I find that I can no longer remember how it used to behave. Did it maintain the left edge position? It maintained the coordinate of the viewport (not sure I'm using the proper terminology) while the data zoomed in and out. (Tough to explain.) So, it would

[Rosegarden-devel] Playback Position Pointer Dragging

2010-06-27 Thread Ted Felix
I would like to make the behavior of the playback position pointer, when dragging, consistent with the dragging behavior in other areas of rg. Right now, the playback position pointer exhibits the following behavior: Drag - smooth drag Shift-Drag - sets the loop range Ctrl-Drag - nothing

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Playback Position Pointer Dragging

2010-06-27 Thread Ted Felix
Take your time. I've got plenty of less controversial items to work on. Ted. D. Michael McIntyre wrote: On Sunday, June 27, 2010, Ted Felix wrote: Objections? I probably do have objections, yes. I don't have time to sift through all of this just at the moment, but I promise

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >