No actually, I meant what I said. What I said was "keeping all rights
reserved" on our logo's or other material seems a bit odd with our
mission.
Trademarks is another restriction on uses, and this we should not abandon.
But I was speaking about copyright
Huib
Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/
Hello,
This is maybe a kind of other point of view.
I believe that the mission for the chaptors is to support free media.. But
with keeping logo's protected under all right reserved that aren't giving
a good example.
I can understand that the official Wikimedia logos aren't free. But a logo
for
Hello,
This is maybe a kind of other point of view.
I believe that the mission for the chaptors is to support free media.. But
with keeping logo's protected under all right reserved that aren't giving
a good example.
I can understand that the official Wikimedia logos aren't free. But a logo
for
Hello,
This is maybe a kind of other point of view.
I believe that the mission for the chaptors is to support free media.. But
with keeping logo's protected under all right reserved that aren't giving
a good example.
I can understand that the official Wikimedia logos aren't free. But a logo
for
Hello,
This is maybe a kind of other point of view.
I believe that the mission for the chaptors is to support free media.. But
with keeping logo's protected under all right reserved that aren't giving
a good example.
I can understand that the official Wikimedia logos aren't free. But a logo
for
Hello,
This is maybe a kind of other point of view.
I believe that the mission for the chaptors is to support free media.. But
with keeping logo's protected under all right reserved that aren't giving
a good example.
I can understand that the official Wikimedia logos aren't free. But a logo
for
Gerard,
Did you even check things before you are shouting? The first English page
on the pikiwiki website say's
"This project is a joint venture of the Israel Internet Association
(ISOC-IL), the Israeli Wikimedia chapter and the Center for Educational
Technology (CET) as part of promoting the
Gerard,
The PikiWiki project is lead by three organisations and not only wikimedia
Israel.
I don't think the problem is Commons accepting the project. But even if we
see it as one of our sisterprojects it still needs to follow Commons
Policies. The same counts for En.Wiki the can't upload fair us
I am the admin that blocked Drork for 72 hours.
The reasson I blocked him is very simple... He is/was removing Deletion
template from images pages and that ended on several places in a editwar.
By removing templates he did made him self a danger for the system Commons
works with. He was warned s
Hello,
I fail to see why the Foundation is involved. The bot isn't giving enough
information regarding source and permission and is therefor blocked by
policy.
That Drork decided to go to the Foundation is just a stupid action, he
could better spend his time fixing the bot...
I think the project
Thanks Finn R,
Your answer helped,
Best regards,
Huib
_
Van: commons-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:commons-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] Namens Finn Rindahl
Verzonden: zondag 15 februari 2009 14:58
Aan: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List
Onderwerp: Re: [Commons-l] P
Hello,
I need some information I can't really fin don Commons.
We have a policy that says you have to do 5 admin actions in 6 months to
keep your adminship, we have sererval users that doesn't have any admin
actions for more than a year, can those user be desysoped on Meta or is
there a o
Hello,
I would like to inform you (and send a email to the list that hadn't
received a email for more than a month) that I just installed HotCat.js on
Incubator .
Hotcat is a tool that makes categorizing much more easy J
You can find it under your settings and than under gadgets.
B
Hello,
There is a discussion about activation Rollback for non admins here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Rollback
Your opinion is much appriciated.
Best regards,
Huib
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> abi...@forgotten-beauty.com wrote:
>>> You could always get an anti-vandal bot set up, which may be able to
>>> spot
>>> vandalism faster than any human could. Obviously it wouldn't catch
>>> everything, but it's worth a try.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ale
> You could always get an anti-vandal bot set up, which may be able to spot
> vandalism faster than any human could. Obviously it wouldn't catch
> everything, but it's worth a try.
>
> --
> Alex
> (User:Majorly)
I don't think a bot could get this kind of vandalism. Using a page
blanking bot could
Hello,
I like the idea but this sound very very bad:
Anyone who is willing to contribute his images can open an account there
and declare that the pictures are his own and that he is willing to
release them either to the public domain or under cc-by-2.5
How can we check if the images are really
17 matches
Mail list logo
