Reminder: Voting on this ballot ends tomorrow. We still need a vote from a
Certificate Consumer.
Dean
From: Cscwg-public On Behalf Of Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:29 AM
To: cscwg-public@cabforum.org
Subject: [Cscwg-public
,self, tcp BTL and the OB1 PML. George.On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 6:33 PM Dean Anderson via users <users@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote:If someone could take a look at https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/11404
and provide some guidance or a work around, I’d appreciate it.
The SC-22 Tutorials wor
Thanks everyone, some great hints and suggestions here.
I’m a little less worried about the switch after reading all these comments.
I’ll be sure to let you all know how it works out!
Cheers, Dean
Barrawind
1980 C 34
Halifax, NS
_
Please show your appreciation for this list and the Photo
If someone could take a look at https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/11404
and provide some guidance or a work around, I’d appreciate it.
The SC-22 Tutorials work just fine, but only on a single node. If you arrange
multiple nodes, it hangs in MPI_Finalize.
I attended the SC22 Tutorial and
other hints and tips?
Thanks, Dean
BarraWind
1980 C 34
Halifax, NS
Please show your appreciation for this list and the Photo Album site and help
me pay the associated bills. Make a contribution at:
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Thanks for your help.
Stu
For whatever it might be worth...
I just went through a possibly similar exercise, getting my 2.11
GWT-RPC-based app to run with Tomcat 10. I had to run around my codebase
and replace 'javax' with 'jakarta', but the last key step was ensuring that
my GWTRPC services inherited from this class:
Looking in the SQL spec, it seems to only mention adding CHECK
constraints to domains, so the option to add NOT NULL constraints
should probably be listed in the "Compatibility" section.
Regards,
Dean
d I'm enthusiastic about making further meaningful contributions
> to PostgreSQL in the future.
>
Committed. Congratulations on your first contribution to PostgreSQL!
May it be the first of many to come.
Regards,
Dean
Add "--exclude-extension" to pg_dump's options.
This option (or equivalently specifying "exclude extension pattern" in
a filter file) allows extensions matching the specified pattern to be
excluded from the dump.
Ayush Vatsa, reviewed by Junwang Zhao, Dean Rasheed, a
y other queries, and we've not gotten questions
> about them.
>
Fair enough. I have no further comments.
Regards,
Dean
r if we should output "ARRAY((SubPlan 1).col1)" to make it
clearer. Since ARRAY_SUBLINK is a special case, which always collects
the first column's values, we could just always output "col1" for
ARRAY.
Regards,
Dean
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:06:36 GMT, Yudi Zheng wrote:
>> Moving array construction within BigInteger.implMultiplyToLen intrinsic
>> candidate to its caller simplifies the intrinsic implementation in JIT
>> compiler.
>
> Yudi Zheng has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:06:36 GMT, Yudi Zheng wrote:
>> Moving array construction within BigInteger.implMultiplyToLen intrinsic
>> candidate to its caller simplifies the intrinsic implementation in JIT
>> compiler.
>
> Yudi Zheng has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483229
--- Comment #8 from Dean Hoover ---
The only apps that I've been able to recreate this is Google Chrome and
UnGoogled Chromium. I don't use any other Chromium-based browser, and it
doesn't seem to happen with Firefox.
It's almost as if the browser
space issues and added
another test for the filter option, based on the test case you added.
I'm marking this ready-for-commit (which I'll probably do myself in a
day or two, unless anyone else claims it first).
Regards,
Dean
From f757ebe748ab47d1e1ab40b343af2a43a9183287 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
of a user-defined
> function named "rescan()". I think we'd be better off with the
> all-caps "RESCAN()".
>
Or perhaps move the parentheses, and write "(rescan SubPlan N)" or
"(reset SubPlan N)". Dunno.
Regards,
Dean
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:44:54 GMT, Yudi Zheng wrote:
> Moving array construction within BigInteger.implMultiplyToLen intrinsic
> candidate to its caller simplifies the intrinsic implementation in JIT
> compiler.
src/hotspot/share/opto/library_call.cpp line 5934:
> 5932: // 'y_start'
tableoid, i.ctid
I think "RESET()" or "RESCAN()" or something like that is better than
"INGORE()", because it indicates that it is actually doing something.
I don't really have a better idea. Perhaps not all uppercase though,
since that seems to go against the rest of the EXPLAIN output.
Regards,
Dean
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 17:14, Jeff Davis wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 11:20 +, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> > So barring any further objections, I'd like to go ahead and get this
> > patch committed.
>
> I like this feature from a user perspective. So +1 f
4th
10. Adjourn
Dean Coclin
CSCWG Chair
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Cscwg-public mailing list
Cscwg-public@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public
Fix PDF doc generation.
Commit c649fa24a4 broke PDF generation, due to a misplaced id
attribute.
Per buildfarm member crake.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7eb9a8201890f3b208fd4c109a5b08bf139b692a
Modified Files
--
of a MERGE
query's RETURNING list.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Isaac Morland, Vik Fearing, Alvaro Herrera,
Gurjeet Singh, Jian He, Jeff Davis, Merlin Moncure, Peter Eisentraut,
and Wolfgang Walther.
Discussion:
http://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWePEGQR5LBn-vD6SfeLZafzEm2Qy_L_Oky2=qw2w3...@mail.gmail.com
Fix EXPLAIN output for subplans in MERGE.
Given a subplan in a MERGE query, EXPLAIN would sometimes fail to
properly display expressions involving Params referencing variables in
other parts of the plan tree.
This would affect subplans outside the topmost join plan node, for
which expansion of
Fix EXPLAIN output for subplans in MERGE.
Given a subplan in a MERGE query, EXPLAIN would sometimes fail to
properly display expressions involving Params referencing variables in
other parts of the plan tree.
This would affect subplans outside the topmost join plan node, for
which expansion of
Fix EXPLAIN output for subplans in MERGE.
Given a subplan in a MERGE query, EXPLAIN would sometimes fail to
properly display expressions involving Params referencing variables in
other parts of the plan tree.
This would affect subplans outside the topmost join plan node, for
which expansion of
eve your quick hack in get_parameter() is not
> correct in detail, but for the moment I didn't bother to debug it.
Yeah, that's exactly what it was, a quick hack. I just wanted to get
some output to see what it would look like in a few real cases.
Overall, I think this is heading in the right direction. I think we
just need a good way to say "the n'th output column of the subplan",
that can't be confused with anything else in the output.
Regards,
Dean
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483229
--- Comment #6 from Dean Hoover ---
Let's try it over Google Drive.
Also - I was able to recreate it with UnGoogled-Chromium - just much
smaller area than with Google Chrome.
Google-Chrome-switching-screens.webm
<https://drive.google.com/fil
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483229
--- Comment #5 from Dean Hoover ---
Hello Nate,
I was definitely able to recreate it, but playing around a bit I think this
might have something to do with Google Chrome. I can't recreate it if I'm
using Firefox or even UnGoogled Chromium.
I
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 11:06, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> Updated patch attached.
>
I have gone over this patch again in detail, and I believe that the
code is in good shape. All review comments have been addressed, and
the only thing remaining is the syntax question.
To recap, this add
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483229
--- Comment #3 from Dean Hoover ---
Sorry Nate - haven't forgot about you.
I did play with the new user, and I couldn't seem to recreate it. That
being said, I have only gotten to test it for about 5-10 minutes. I hope
to dig more into it tonight
Rebased version attached.
Regards,
Dean
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
new file mode 100644
index f8f83d4..380d0c9
--- a/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
@@ -394,10 +394,14 @@
conditions for each action are re-evaluated on the updated version
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 08:58, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> I think I'll go make those doc changes, and back-patch them
> separately, since they're not related to this patch.
>
OK, I've done that. Here is a rebased patch on top of that, with the
other changes you suggested.
Regards,
Dea
doc: Improve a couple of places in the MERGE docs.
In the synopsis, make the syntax for merge_update consistent with the
syntax for a plain UPDATE command. It was missing the optional "ROW"
keyword that can be used in a multi-column assignment, and the option
to assign from a multi-column
doc: Improve a couple of places in the MERGE docs.
In the synopsis, make the syntax for merge_update consistent with the
syntax for a plain UPDATE command. It was missing the optional "ROW"
keyword that can be used in a multi-column assignment, and the option
to assign from a multi-column
doc: Improve a couple of places in the MERGE docs.
In the synopsis, make the syntax for merge_update consistent with the
syntax for a plain UPDATE command. It was missing the optional "ROW"
keyword that can be used in a multi-column assignment, and the option
to assign from a multi-column
make those doc changes, and back-patch them
separately, since they're not related to this patch.
Regards,
Dean
be
INNER_VAR references to the targetlist of the join node immediately
under the ModifyTable node.
So I think we want to do something like the attached.
Regards,
Dean
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c
new file mode 100644
index 2a1ee69..2231752
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483229
--- Comment #2 from Dean Hoover ---
Hello Nate,
I've been using Wayland for quite a while now.
Once I'm finished with something else I'll test with a clean use account.
Thanks - Dean
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:09 PM Nate Graham
wrote:
> ht
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483229
Bug ID: 483229
Summary: Unable to click background app/window to foreground
using mouse
Classification: Plasma
Product: Active Window Control
Version: unspecified
Platform:
For reasons due to CRAN becoming more stringent with S3-type function calls, we
needed to change the plot.param to:
plot_param … (the previous no looks for an object or function called ‘param’).
Dean
Dr. Dean C. Adams
Distinguished Professor of Evolutionary Biology
Department of Ecology
Index Cond: (pguser = CURRENT_USER)
but I think that's useful extra clarification.
Regards,
Dean
diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
b/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
new file mode 100644
index c355e8f..f0ff936
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/post
be reset
in load_relcache_init_file(), alongside rd_pkindex, though I don't
think it can matter in practice.
Regards,
Dean
Hi, I'm almost certain this has been addressed before so apologies... but is
there a trick to import EM map files into COOT, it keeps crashing when I've
tried.
Ta muchly in advance
Dean
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list
ach listed object as well as the system
> catalogs.
OK, that looks useful, especially given that most people will still
probably use this against a single database, and it's making that more
flexible.
I think this is good to go.
Regards,
Dean
Is there anything that prevents those recipients from downloading and storing
those recordings indefinitely?
From: Martijn Katerbarg
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 8:56 AM
To: Dean Coclin ; infrastructure@cabforum.org
Subject: Re: Meeting recordings
Dean,
During the F2F
Recordings are only used by the minute takers to assist in that task. After
that they should be destroyed.
I’m currently receiving recording emails after the CSCWG and the regular CABF
meetings
Dean Coclin
From: Infrastructure On Behalf Of Martijn
Katerbarg via
e thing. So can
we get away with making sure that RelationGetIndexList() doesn't set
relation->rd_replidindex to a deferrable PK, while still allowing
relation->rd_pkindex to be one?
Regards,
Dean
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 13:55, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> > If I only execute merge , I will get the following error:
> > merge into tgt a using src1 c on a.a = c.a when matched then update
> > set b = c.b when not matched then insert (a,b) values(c.a,c.b); -- excute
&
Fix handling of self-modified tuples in MERGE.
When an UPDATE or DELETE action in MERGE returns TM_SelfModified,
there are 2 possible causes:
1). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by the current
command. This can happen if the target row joins to more than one
source row,
Fix handling of self-modified tuples in MERGE.
When an UPDATE or DELETE action in MERGE returns TM_SelfModified,
there are 2 possible causes:
1). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by the current
command. This can happen if the target row joins to more than one
source row,
Fix handling of self-modified tuples in MERGE.
When an UPDATE or DELETE action in MERGE returns TM_SelfModified,
there are 2 possible causes:
1). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by the current
command. This can happen if the target row joins to more than one
source row,
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 01:38:56 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> This change creates a new sort of native recursive lock that can be held
>> during JNI and Java calls, which can be used for synchronization while
>> creating objArrayKlasses at runtime.
>>
>> Passes tier1-7.
>
> Coleen Phillimore
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 22:59:04 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> This change creates a new sort of native recursive lock that can be held
> during JNI and Java calls, which can be used for synchronization while
> creating objArrayKlasses at runtime.
>
> Passes tier1-7.
Marked as reviewed by dlong
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 22:59:04 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> This change creates a new sort of native recursive lock that can be held
> during JNI and Java calls, which can be used for synchronization while
> creating objArrayKlasses at runtime.
>
> Passes tier1-7.
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 22:59:04 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> This change creates a new sort of native recursive lock that can be held
> during JNI and Java calls, which can be used for synchronization while
> creating objArrayKlasses at runtime.
>
> Passes tier1-7.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 23:47:01 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/mutex.cpp line 537:
>>
>>> 535: // can be called by jvmti by VMThread.
>>> 536: if (current->is_Java_thread()) {
>>> 537: _sem.wait_with_safepoint_check(JavaThread::cast(current));
>>
>> Why
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 22:59:04 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> This change creates a new sort of native recursive lock that can be held
> during JNI and Java calls, which can be used for synchronization while
> creating objArrayKlasses at runtime.
>
> Passes tier1-7.
OK, that makes sense about
ysis
to turn them into MergeFunc nodes (not quite a complete revert back to
an earlier version of the patch, but not far off).
Regards,
Dean
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEZATCWx0J0-v=Qjc6gXzR=KtsdvAE7Ow=D=mu50agoe+pv...@mail.gmail.com
e a recent example, identifying some cases that
could elucidate digitizing issues (and could be revisited).
All of these tools (both statistical and graphical) are available in the latest
versions of geomorph and RRPP, now found on CRAN.
Dean Adams and Mike Collyer
Dr. Dean C. Adams
Distinguished
d be extended to support "exclude
extension pattern" lines in the filter file. That syntax is already
accepted, but it throws a not-supported error, but it's hopefully not
too hard to make that work now.
2). It ought to have some tests in the test script.
Regards,
Dean
l these changes are, but I don't really object.
You need to update the synopsis section of the docs though.
Regards,
Dean
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 22:59:04 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> This change creates a new sort of native recursive lock that can be held
> during JNI and Java calls, which can be used for synchronization while
> creating objArrayKlasses at runtime.
>
> Passes tier1-7.
Is the caller always a
Just got my Rugby shirt… LOVE IT!
Super great quality. Thanks JFK, Very impressed.
Dean
C 34
Halifax, NS
> On Feb 29, 2024, at 1:16 PM, Motion Designs Limited via CnC-List
> wrote:
>
> What Jeff said :-)
>
> JKC
> www.candcyachts.com
> Motion Designs Limited
>
dexList() by b0e96f311985
need reverting.
Regards,
Dean
te changes to other rows.")));
return false;
My initial reaction is that neither of those blocks of code is
entirely correct, and that they should both be doing both of those
checks. I.e., something like the attached (which probably needs some
additional test cases).
Regards,
Dean
Sent from my iPhone
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help
PKs, so we still want the
throwaway NOT NULL constraints in that case, otherwise we'd be hurting
performance of restore.
Regards,
Dean
Fix doc omission for MERGE into updatable views.
Commit 5f2e179bd3 missed one place in rules.sgml that should have
mentioned MERGE. Also, be more specific when saying that MERGE doesn't
support rules, since it does support SELECT rules.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
+1
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:32 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote:
>
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 09:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> By all means let's get the feature out there. It's not a frequently
> requested thing but it does seem to come up.
>
Pushed. Thanks for reviewing.
Regards,
Dean
there is no
rewriter support for non-SELECT rules with MERGE operations.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jian He and Alvaro Herrera.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCVcB1g0nmxuEc-A+gGB0HnfcGQNGYH7gS=7rq0u0zo...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg
ate(),
ensuring that ExecUpdateEpilogue() is always called if ExecUpdateAct()
returns TM_Ok, reducing the chance of bugs.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Alvaro Herrera.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWGGmigGBzLHkJm5Ccv2mMxXmwi3%2Buq0yhwDHm-tsvSLg%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Deta
e on the wrong
thread");//set break point on this line and view the stack to see what's
causing it
}
This might not be the cause of your problem, but if you have instances
where things are done in the wrong thread, you'll definitely hit sporadic
issues.
Dean
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:16 AM Kri
The review period for CSCWG 21 and 22 has concluded. No essential claims
were filed.
Corey-please create the final guideline, based on the drafts, and publish to
the website. The effective date will be today.
Thank you,
Dean Coclin
CSCWG Chair
From: Cscwg-public On Behalf
that I might be overlooking something, particularly in
relation to what might get added to the targetlist at various stages
during planning for different types of query.
Regards,
Dean
Attendees:
Abhishek Bhat (eMudhra), Ben Dewberry (Keyfactor), Brianca Martin (Amazon),
Bruce Morton (Entrust), Corey Bonnell (DigiCert), Dean Coclin (DigiCert),
Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA), Ian McMillan (Microsoft), Inaba Atsushi
(GlobalSign), Inigo Barreira (Sectigo), Keshava Nagaraju
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 at 17:10, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
>
> Hi Dean,
>
> I did a quick review and a little bit of testing on the patch today. I
> think it's a good/useful idea, and I think the code is ready to go (the
> code is certainly much cleaner than anything I'd writt
d better to build the
projection in the executor rather than the planner, since then the
extra work can be avoided, if EPQ is not invoked.
It seems to work (it passes the isolation tests, and I couldn't break
it in ad hoc testing), but it definitely needs tidying up, and it's
hard to be sure that
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:38:26 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this trivial change that renames the file
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jvmti/agent_common/agent_common.h to
> agent_common.hpp.
>
> The #include updates were performed mechanically, and builds would fail if
>
nly need
* to build RelOptInfos for them, which is done by expand_appendrel_subquery.
*/
> Is this something we should explain the RangeTblEntry comments?
>
+1
Regards,
Dean
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:38:26 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this trivial change that renames the file
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jvmti/agent_common/agent_common.h to
> agent_common.hpp.
>
> The #include updates were performed mechanically, and builds would fail if
>
, if retiring Java 8 and lower output support allows
Maven to shed technical debt and deliver improvements faster, I'd get
over my disappointment. :)
Regards,
Robert Dean
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 3:49 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
>
> I think this starts to make reasonable picture:
>
> If you are on
ble is subject to concurrent inserts (or
primary key updates), it might be better to use INSERT ... ON CONFLICT
DO UPDATE [2] instead of MERGE. That would avoid inserting duplicates
(though I can't say how compatible that is with anything in Oracle).
Regards,
Dean
[1]
https://w
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 14:49, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> On the face of it, the simplest fix is to tweak is_simple_union_all()
> to prevent UNION ALL subquery pullup for MERGE, forcing a
> subquery-scan plan. A quick test shows that that fixes the reported
> issue.
>
>
We use the tool in the membership management portal now to track the votes.
Dean Coclin
Sr. Director Business Development
M 1.781.789.8686
From: Infrastructure On Behalf Of
Inigo Barreira via Infrastructure
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 7:48 AM
To: Ben Wilson via
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 15:16, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed writes:
> > Looking at the script itself, the addition, subtraction,
> > multiplication and division tests at the top are probably pointless,
> > since I would expect those operations to be tested adequatel
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 14:49, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> Also, if the concurrent update were an update of a key
> column that was included in the join condition, the re-scan would
> follow the update to a new matching source row, which is inconsistent
> with what would happen if
e of a key
column that was included in the join condition, the re-scan would
follow the update to a new matching source row, which is inconsistent
with what would happen if it were a join to a regular relation.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Dean
basic arithmetic operations internally. We might want to check that
I/O of large numerics is still being tested properly though.
If we did that, numeric_big would be even further down the list of
expensive tests, and I'd say it should be run by default.
Regards,
Dean
f the top of my head, I can't say to what extent that's true, but it
wouldn't surprise me if at least some of the tests added in the last 4
commits to touch that file aren't covered by tests elsewhere. Indeed
that certainly looks like the case for 18a02ad2a5. I'm sure those
tests could be pared down though.
Regards,
Dean
Dear All,
We would like to bring to your attention the 2024 Neutrons in Structural
Biology workshop. This workshop will highlight the need for next-generation
instruments and toolsets for structural biology, with a focus on neutrons and
other complementary techniques, and the development of
Here are the final minutes of the subject call:
CSCWG Conference Call-2024/01/25
Attendees:
Scott Rea,
Corey Bonnell,
Thomas Zermeno,
Bruce Morton,
Atsushi Inaba,
Mohit Kumar,
Dean Coclin,
Brianca Martin,
Martijn Katerbarg,
Bhat Abhishek,
Trevoli Ponds-White,
Tim Crawford
fossils) is preferable than using a fossil-only
backbone phylogeny, as the problem you outlined can be more pronounced with the
latter approach.
Dean
Dr. Dean C. Adams
Distinguished Professor of Evolutionary Biology
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology
Iowa State University
-stamp Requirements update.
6. Discussions for F2F
7. Other business
8. Next meeting - February 22nd (Should we cancel since F2F is the
following week?)
9. Adjourn
Dean Coclin
CSCWG Chair
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Evolutionary Biology. 10(216):1-10.
Dean
Dr. Dean C. Adams
Distinguished Professor of Evolutionary Biology
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology
Iowa State University
https://faculty.sites.iastate.edu/dcadams/
phone: 515-294-3834
-Original Message-
From: morphmet2@googlegroups.com
stent with what both Oracle and Postgres do if
you replace the merge command with the equivalent standalone update
for that row: "update mergeinto_0023_tb01 set year = 30 where id = 2"
in the second session. So I'd say that this is an Oracle bug.
Regards,
Dean
(0.5). They're useful for a quick visual check of the results,
and confirming the expected number of digits after the decimal point
in the numeric case. However, I think those tests are insufficient on
their own.
Regards,
Dean
gly, the cfbot didn't pick up on the fact that it needed
rebasing. Anyway, the copyright years in the new file's header comment
needed updating, so here is a rebase doing that.
Regards,
Dean
From 15d0ba981ff03eca7143726fe7512adf00ee3a84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dean Rasheed
Date: Fri, 25 Au
_MIN/MAX as arguments to these functions,
if that's what you need. I think if we were going to have a shorthand
for getting full-range random integers, it would probably be better to
introduce separate no-arg functions for that. I'm not really sure if
that's a sufficiently common use case to justify the effort though.
Regards,
Dean
d on the plan
chosen.
I think the best (and probably simplest) solution is to always opt for
a NOT MATCHED BY TARGET action in this case, so then the result is
predictable, and we can document what is expected to happen.
Regards,
Dean
101 - 200 of 57719 matches
Mail list logo
