Anthony Towns wrote:
Personally, I'd say that now would be the time for any anti-payment
people to say we can do this better, and look, we'll prove it, and make
up their own target date for etch, and demonstrate how much energy and
I hereby set December 6th 2007 as release date. With help of
Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
there are two issues where I would like to ask you to comment on:
- mantis: We have two requests to allow it in. Is this ok from your
side? (No bug id, sorry - in case that not, could you please open an
RC bug on mantis?)
Why should the Security Team oppose a
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:12:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
there are two issues where I would like to ask you to comment on:
- mantis: We have two requests to allow it in. Is this ok from your
side? (No bug id, sorry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:19:38 +0100
Source: gerstensaft
Binary: gerstensaft
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:03:01 +0100
Source: gerstensaft
Binary: gerstensaft
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Gustavo Franco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061209 01:16]:
I would be glad to run one of the P4 or P3 to debian-desktop
development purposes. Unfortunately, i'm in Brazil and a friend of
mine (OpenBSD developer) had troubles when tried to receive some
donated hardware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:44:09 +0100
Source: gui-apt-key
Binary: gui-apt-key
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
Package: gosa
Version: 2.5.6-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
The documentation in gosa tells the admin to install gosa.conf under
/etc/gosa/gosa.conf, and to make it readable by the group www-data.
In this configuration
Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
Package: gosa
Version: 2.5.6-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
The documentation in gosa tells the admin to install gosa.conf under
/etc/gosa/gosa.conf, and to make it readable by the group www-data.
In this configuration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1229-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
December 6th, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1229-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
December 6th, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1227-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
December 4th, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1224-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
December 3rd, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1225-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
December 3rd, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1225-2[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
December 3rd, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1227-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
December 4th, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1224-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
December 3rd, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1225-2[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
December 3rd, 2006
Please take care.
Regards,
Joey
- Forwarded message from Blake Frantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 14:47:40 -0800
From: Blake Frantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Small low priority bug in the Securing Debian Manual
X-Folder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lynx
Version: 2.8.5-2sarge2.2
Severity: important
According to RFC 2818 Section 3.1 certificates may contain the wildcard
character * which is considered to match any single domain name component
or component fragment. E.g., *.a.com matches foo.a.com but not
bar.foo.a.com. f*.com matches
Martin Schulze wrote:
Package: lynx
Version: 2.8.5-2sarge2.2
Severity: important
According to RFC 2818 Section 3.1 certificates may contain the wildcard
character * which is considered to match any single domain name component
or component fragment. E.g., *.a.com matches foo.a.com
Martin Schulze wrote:
According to RFC 2818 Section 3.1 certificates may contain the wildcard
character * which is considered to match any single domain name component
or component fragment. E.g., *.a.com matches foo.a.com but not
bar.foo.a.com. f*.com matches foo.com but not bar.com
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 06:40:08PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Martin Schulze wrote:
Package: lynx
Version: 2.8.5-2sarge2.2
btw, lynx-cur contains something analogous.
You mean, lynx-cur has this fixed? Or that it suffers from the
same problem?
Regards
Hi,
a new upstream version of Gerstensaft[1] is in preparation and the
code has been mostly fixed. Thus the set of translatable strings[2]
should also be fixed and may be translated now. The package is fully
internationalised and ready to accept translations.
Gerstensaft is a graphical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1221-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
November 30th, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1221-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
November 30th, 2006
---
Debian Weekly News
http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2006/41/
Debian Weekly News - November 28th, 2006
---
Welcome to this year's 41st issue of DWN,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:43:10 +0100
Source: dbview
Binary: dbview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: kayak, canoe
According to the description, both kayak and canoe implement the same.
It would be a **good** idea to add the bit about Qt and Gtk2 not
only in the last line of the description but in the short description.
It appears taht it would also be a good idea to describe the
Package: arpalert
Version: current
Severity: wishlist
- Description: monitoring arp changes in ethernet networks
+ Description: Monitor ARP changes in ethernet networks
Regards,
Joey
--
Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea.
Please always Cc to me
Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi,
do the security@ people have a DSA in preparation for links and/or
elinks for CVE-2006-5925, or should I prepare a patch for the stable
versions too?
As far as I know, no. Please prepare an update.
Regards,
Joey
--
Given enough thrust pigs will fly,
Package: pwman3
Version: current
Severity: minor
- Description: console password managment application
+ Description: console password management application
^
Regards,
Joey
--
Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good
Daniel E. Markle wrote:
Package: security.debian.org
A dig on the security.debian.org mirrors returns three results:
security.debian.org.300 IN A 212.211.132.32
security.debian.org.300 IN A 212.211.132.250
security.debian.org.300 IN A
Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi,
do the security@ people have a DSA in preparation for links and/or
elinks for CVE-2006-5925, or should I prepare a patch for the stable
versions too?
As far as I know, no. Please prepare an update.
Regards,
Joey
--
Given enough thrust pigs will fly,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:24:32 +0100
Source: sendfile
Binary: sendfile
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1b-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 01:02, peter green wrote:
3: the restructuring of the ssh packages probablly deserves a mention in
the upgrading section, if i'm not mistaken then upgrading a system with
ssh installed but sshd disabled is likely to result in sshd enabled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:17:51 +0100
Source: sendfile
Binary: sendfile
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1b-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Johan Haggi wrote:
As long as there's enough contrast I don't see an immediate problem
with it. Dark blue on darker blue is not good. However, dark blue on
light blue seems to fit. Maybe it would be better to choose an even
lighter blue, I don't know.
[...]
Debian's leftcol
victory wrote:
http://www.debian.org/News/2004/20040619
it's strange that only one place that doesn't have 2004 :-)
Well spotted! Committed.
Thanks,
Joey
--
Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the
Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
It's seems you only see arguments that enable you to say things
supposed to hurt me. What about the blue text on a blue background for
I usually only comment on things I can comment on. You can consider
me neutral on the others, I may be undecided or feel not competent
dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:22:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, because this is a kernel security bug. The smbmount patch was
entertained pre-sarge only as a stopgap due to the proximity to release; the
right place to fix this is still in the kernel (upstream as
Martin Schulze wrote:
Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
As I say, what I find ugly, is the menu colors, which means the white text
on
a dark blue background on the red brackground, and the text in blue on a
blue
Aha. So you don't like the white on dark blue on red. Since the
colours even
dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:22:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, because this is a kernel security bug. The smbmount patch was
entertained pre-sarge only as a stopgap due to the proximity to release; the
right place to fix this is still in the kernel (upstream as
Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
That's why I would first like to see detailed criticism on what's
wrong with the current site or layout before we can start discussing
how to change this and see how it can be improved. If the site is
fine as it is, there's no need to change anything.
To make a
Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
Le Mardi 7 Novembre 2006 12:40, Mathieu Stumpf a écrit :
Hello,
I've worked on some new design for the debian website, tell me what you
think about, which once you like the most (if any), what's good/bad, I'll
take the best, and make a css with it.
You can see
Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
As I say, what I find ugly, is the menu colors, which means the white text on
a dark blue background on the red brackground, and the text in blue on a blue
Aha. So you don't like the white on dark blue on red. Since the
colours even have good contrast to each other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1210-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
November 14th, 2006
Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
They look so totally different form the current form - they probably
won't reach many seconds.
I believ it would be more helpful to determine the parts on the
current layout that need improvement and develop a better layout for
these instead of overhauling the
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
No, please don't/ It is one thing to patch dpkg to make things
easier for the derivatives (on the other hand, they can patch their
own version of dpkg), it is another to change how uplaods work in
Debian, or to reject uploads to Debian because one forgot add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1210-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
November 14th, 2006
Andreas Barth wrote:
we have two bug reports against the release notes which should be
discussed here:
#390441: release-notes: Document unclear Mozilla security situation
Mozilla and friends will be supported as long as their package
maintainer are able to backport patches from upstream.
Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:06:38AM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
[...]
*sigh* That would've been the best solution.
I'd say this is ok, however, please watch security updates as the security
team will probably forget to update apache2-mpm-itk when apache2 has been
Package: libgtk2-perl
Version: 1.140-1
Severity: wishlist
The documentation for Gtk2::Entry (using perldoc) lacks a reference to the
signal 'changed' emitted whenever something happened inside an Entry widget.
Please add it.
Regards,
Joey
--
A mathematician is a machine for converting
Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
I've worked on some new design for the debian website, tell me what you think
about, which once you like the most (if any), what's good/bad, I'll take the
best, and make a css with it.
They look so totally different form the current form - they probably
won't reach many
Martin Schulze wrote:
Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
I've worked on some new design for the debian website, tell me what you
think
about, which once you like the most (if any), what's good/bad, I'll take
the
best, and make a css with it.
They look so totally different form the current
Peter Karlsson wrote:
This will provide a smaller default font, it can still be enlarged
with Ctrl-+ (or was it Shift-+?) in IceWeasel.
If you like a smaller font, then why don't you set one in your browser?
Hmm. I thought I did that. Checking again revealed that it was
set to a horrible
Package: debtags
Version: 1.6.2
There is a space missing:
impromtu!joey(pts/0):~ debtags help search
[..]
-i, --invertinvert the match, selecting non-matching items
[..]
---
Here are two spaces missing:
impromtu!joey(pts/0):~
Package: gdm
Version: 2.16.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Moin,
in the current version of GDM in the non-themed version the following
strings (among others) are used in the user dialog:
_Session
_Action
_Start Again
It would be nice if _S (i.e. Alt-S) won't be used as shortcut twice
in the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:24:56 +0100
Source: gui-apt-key
Binary: gui-apt-key
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
severity 394250 wishlist
thanks
Eddy Petri??or wrote:
Package: gui-apt-key
Version: 0.1-3
Severity: normal
Hello,
I just tried gui-apt-key and I managed to erase one of the keys
(thankfully was an expired key) when I wanted to view its properties. I
have seen that regular buttons were
reopen 387089
thanks
I'm sorry to tell you, but this problem is not yet fixed.
Installed version of ca-certificates:
ii ca-certificates 20061027Common CA
Certificates PEM files
There should be a link, but isn't:
finlandia!joey(tty1):/etc/ssl/certs l |grep
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
* Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061020 16:24]:
PS: Forgot a small nice to have in the
gui-apt-key-desktop-icon.patch: If you like the icon, you should add an
32 bit xpm version of it too, and add it to the menu file. Sorry, I can
create a new
reopen 387089
thanks
I'm sorry to tell you, but this problem is not yet fixed.
Installed version of ca-certificates:
ii ca-certificates 20061027Common CA
Certificates PEM files
There should be a link, but isn't:
finlandia!joey(tty1):/etc/ssl/certs l |grep
---
Debian Weekly News
http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2006/40/
Debian Weekly News - October 31st, 2006
---
Welcome to this year's 40th issue of DWN,
Rob Bradford wrote:
Please switch the sarge release notes to using the sarge branch and
start building for etch from HEAD.
Once this is done I will merge the etch branch down into HEAD.
Done.
I've also checked out HEAD for etch and adjusted the build
script.
Regards,
Joey
--
Theodore Tso wrote:
Folks who are claiming that they are demotivated because two people
have volunteered to give up a full month of their time to take on a
job where they giving up something like 75% of their normal income ---
and the problem is that they gave up only 75% instead of 100% ---
Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
cpp-3.4- The GNU C preprocessor
cpp-3.4-doc - Documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
fastjar- Jar creation utility
g++-3.4- The GNU C++ compiler
g77-3.4- The GNU Fortran 77 compiler
g77-3.4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:29:59 +0200
Source: gtetrinet
Binary: gtetrinet
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.7.8-1sarge2
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin
Version: 0.3.7-2sarge1
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
python-docutils - Utilities for the documentation of Python modules
python-roman - A module for generating/analyzing Roman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:05:12 +0200
Source: trac
Binary: trac
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.1-3sarge5
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Seconded.
Regards,
Joey
Martin Wuertele wrote:
I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian
constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping
the Package Policy
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:40:43PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian
constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader
Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
Hi Joey (Martin Schulze),
In [1] you wrote ...Please understand that due to this there may be no
future issues of DWN in the current form or that they will only be
released less frequently.
As a long time reader of DWN and because there is a may in the
previous
tags 394763 pending
thanks
Rui Branco wrote:
Package: gui-apt-key
Version:
Tags: l10n, patch
Severity: wishlist
Portuguese (pt) translation for gui-apt-key's debconf messages
by Miguel Figueiredo elmig _at_ debianpt.org.
Feel free to use it.
Cool. Added. will be part of 0.2.
Regards,
severity 387089 serious
thanks
Raising the severity since I've been beaten by this a second time
when this mail goes through (on a second host, though) and because
it'll hit all other admins who have installed custom certificates
that don't come from the ca-certificates package (e.g. the debconf
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Package: gui-apt-key
Version: 0.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Thanks for writing and packaging gui-apt-key; that's really a usefull
tool. However may I suggest, to tell the user how the binary is called?
I needed a couple of seconds (and an dpkg -L gui-apt-key)
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Package: gui-apt-key
Version: 0.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Wouldn't it be a good feature when adding a new key to show the user the
fingerprint of the key to be added and asking him to verify it before
really adding the key?
Is the fingerprint provided anywhere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:07:55 +0200
Source: gui-apt-key
Binary: gui-apt-key
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
HXC wrote:
If you are interested in my proposal, please let me know,
Thank you for your time, hope to hear from you soon,
Augusto Frausin
Nice post and I rally agree with your assesment. Unfortunatly there is
not a lot going on in these lists. I also offered my help but find it
hard to
Eftaxiopoulos Dimitrios wrote:
Hello,
after searching several debian list archives using a keyword and having
collected the tiles of the postings, I click on the posting tile to view the
full content of it and I get the response:
Not Found
The requested URL //srv/-srv07/msg6.html was
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
That does not require using a print this page or printer-friendly
version link; CSS has media types which allow you to modify the
lay-out of a page depending on whether you're viewing it in a graphical
browser, printing it out, or using a speech synthesizer to listen to
There is an organisation that tries to deliver gratis CDs/DVDs to
end uses:
http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/log/?200609101024
Regards,
Joey
--
Long noun chains don't automatically imply security. -- Bruce Schneier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Martin Schulze wrote:
The only two items in the prepared but unreleased issue are from
Sebastian.
I just noticed that my memory fooled me. One of these two items
was from Thomas Viehmann. Credits where credits are due.
Regards,
Joey
--
Long noun chains don't automatically imply
tags 392002 pending
tags 392002 upstream
thanks
Yuri Kozlov wrote:
A file with russian program translation is attached.
Thanks, it'll be released together with 0.2.
Regards,
Joey
--
All language designers are arrogant. Goes with the territory...
-- Larry Wall
Please always
Andreas Barth wrote:
3) Possibly get some sort of team together (if there isn't one
already) to work on reporting regularly. (If such team exists/is
formed count me in :)
You're welcome. Such a team exists in parts, as Martin (zobel) and I are
currently responsible, but we definitly need
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Le lundi 09 octobre 2006 18:54, Martin Schulze a écrit :
hard on getting Debian better be funded similarily? I know that
several people have lost their motivation to work on Debian as before
(yes, others will hate me for writing this again) because of this.
Some
mmlacak wrote:
It's also being discussed at the moment if/how money affects developers.
Well, lets make possible for money to come in, in the first place.
In my opinion, money destroys. I believe it's already happening in
Debian. However, many people don't seem to care or understand.
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Huh? I hate to be the one to break it to you, but many things life
boil down to a question of time or money.
* Do I mow my lawn (time) or hire someone to do it (money)?
* Do I was my car (time) or hire someone to do it (money)?
* Do I program my own OS (time) or
Jérôme Marant wrote:
hard on getting Debian better be funded similarily? I know that
several people have lost their motivation to work on Debian as before
(yes, others will hate me for writing this again) because of this.
Some developers ask themselves already why they should work
Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hi,
Taking the data available on nm.debian.org, I've noticed that in the
last six months only 28 applicants became Debian Developers. This means
roughly every 6.4 days an applicant gets processed by a DAM.
Cool! About 5 new developers per month. That's great!
The
/attitude of other people wrong. That
doesn't remove their feelings, though.
If you, Martin Schulze, were given financial compensation to work full
time on key Debian taks, and you'd enjoy it, I'd be very happy for
you.
I would probably reject this. Depending on the source I would reject
Jérôme Marant wrote:
It's also being discussed at the moment if/how money affects developers.
Well, lets make possible for money to come in, in the first place.
In my opinion, money destroys. I believe it's already happening in
Debian. However, many people don't seem to care or
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:58:45AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Huh? I hate to be the one to break it to you, but many things life
boil down to a question of time or money.
* Do I mow my lawn (time) or hire someone to do
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[ Continuing publicly a discussion started in -private, with the agreement
of Pierre ]
The discussion concerns the use of money as a resource within Debian.
Dunc-Tank's principle is to use the money to pay for real work and not
only for travel expenses and
mmlacak wrote:
So, my question is: can we make SPI ( http://www.spi-inc.org/,
http://www.debian.org/donations ) into monetary service which accepts
from and is able to transfer money to any country in the world? Is able
to deliver money basically from door to door ( post-office/bank to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1192-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
October 6th, 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:42:10 +0200
Source: gui-apt-key
Binary: gui-apt-key
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Simon Paillard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 12:58:18PM +0400, Max Kosmach wrote:
Package: mirrors
Please change IP address of www.ru.debian.org from 213.171.53.130 to
82.179.191.68
Our ISP changed our address space.
PS. You can check availability of debian mirror at
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
I was thinking that maybe the events / speakers page should be ordered
based on:
- topic level (introduction, users, developers): so that users can
easily find which talks might be relevant to their level
- date, so that users can be aware of which time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1192-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
October 6th, 2006
501 - 600 of 7500 matches
Mail list logo
