> On Apr 21, 2024, at 8:00 PM, James Addison via rb-general
> wrote:
>
> ...
> That universal newline handling may cause problems in some cases if
> not handled carefully, but surprisingly -- at least to me -- 'git'
> itself also automatically converts the line-endings of files to the
>
> On Apr 10, 2024, at 7:42 AM, kpcyrd wrote:
>
> On 4/10/24 12:58 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-03/?draft
>
> > Reproducible builds developer kpcyrd reported that that the Arch Linux
> > "minimal container userland" is now 100% reproducible after
> On Apr 2, 2024, at 1:11 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
>
> For me, the distinction is that the local storage is under the direct
> control of the person trying to rebuild, while the network and the
> servers elsewhere in the network are not. If local storage is
> unreliable, you can fix or
> On Mar 20, 2024, at 8:42 AM, kpcyrd wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> in last week's email to the reproducible-builds email list[1] about
> reproducible Arch Linux I mentioned there's only one unreproducible package
> left in docker.io/library/archlinux.
>
> [1]:
>
> On Mar 12, 2024, at 11:45 AM, Vagrant Cascadian
> wrote:
>
> On 2024-03-12, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 06:24:22PM +, James Addison via rb-general wrote:
>>> Please find below a draft of the message I'll send to each affected
>>> bugreport.
>>
>> looks good to me,
> On Mar 4, 2024, at 3:37 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:52:07AM -0800, John Gilmore wrote:
>> Why would these become "wishlist" bugs as opposed to actual reproducibility
>> bugs
>> that deserve fixing, just because one server at Debian no longer invokes this
>> bug
