[Bug 1839216] [NEW] xenial VM hangs copying block device

2019-08-06 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: With a Xenial kernel running in a VM (32 cores and 65536 MB RAM), the following script hangs in the dd command: == #!/bin/bash dd if=/dev/zero of=in.bin bs=1 seek=6442506751 count=1 cp in.bin

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1839216] [NEW] xenial VM hangs copying block device

2019-08-06 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: With a Xenial kernel running in a VM (32 cores and 65536 MB RAM), the following script hangs in the dd command: == #!/bin/bash dd if=/dev/zero of=in.bin bs=1 seek=6442506751 count=1 cp in.bin

[Bug 1090593] Re: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013

2018-05-12 Thread LaMont Jones
Precise reached EOL some time ago. Marking this "won't fix" ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090593 Title:

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2018-05-12 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas/1.9 Assignee: LaMont Jones (lamont) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to l

Re: bind9 shipping outdated root hint file (etc.)

2017-08-08 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:47:27PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote: > It was just mentioned "en passant" in a conversation at DebConf that > bind9 is shipping a root hint file from 2003. The version of db.root in stretch is from Feb 17, 2016. I suspect that the comment originates from the fact that I've

Bug#857465: Postfix-3.1.4 reintroduces bug 214741

2017-05-21 Thread LaMont Jones
tags 857465 + wontfix -- I believe that the postinst does the best it can at getting the FQDN into main.cf -- this doesn't do much for the upgrade path though. I agree with upstream that postfix should not be calling gethostbyname at runtime -- if this is happening in a fresh install, then I'm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1683911] [NEW] ifup places illegally named variables into the environment

2017-04-18 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: When dhclient brings up interface eth0.55, the environment passed to scripts includes: IFUPDOWN_eth0=parent-lock IFUPDOWN_eth0.55=post-up IFACE=eth0.55 LOGICAL=eth0.55 ADDRFAM=inet METHOD=dhcp MODE=start PHASE=post-up VERBOSITY=0

[Bug 1683911] [NEW] ifup places illegally named variables into the environment

2017-04-18 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: When dhclient brings up interface eth0.55, the environment passed to scripts includes: IFUPDOWN_eth0=parent-lock IFUPDOWN_eth0.55=post-up IFACE=eth0.55 LOGICAL=eth0.55 ADDRFAM=inet METHOD=dhcp MODE=start PHASE=post-up VERBOSITY=0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1408106] Re: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs

2017-04-04 Thread LaMont Jones
This bug causes maas testing to fail (at least the ntp test, because of overlayfs and apparmor and ntp having a profile.) See https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1677336 Hardware testing is a requirement for MAAS 2.2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1408106] Re: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs

2017-04-04 Thread LaMont Jones
This bug causes maas testing to fail (at least the ntp test, because of overlayfs and apparmor and ntp having a profile.) See https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1677336 Hardware testing is a requirement for MAAS 2.2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Bug 1408106] Re: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs

2017-04-04 Thread LaMont Jones
This bug causes maas testing to fail (at least the ntp test, because of overlayfs and apparmor and ntp having a profile.) See https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1677336 Hardware testing is a requirement for MAAS 2.2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1408106] Re: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs

2017-04-04 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1408106 Title: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs To manage

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1408106] Re: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs

2017-04-04 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1408106 Title: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1408106] Re: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs

2017-04-04 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1408106 Title: attach_disconnected not sufficient for

Re: maas hooks/triggers for dns (de-)registration

2017-03-29 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 03:36:19PM +0200, Patrizio Bassi wrote: > 2017-03-29 15:18 GMT+02:00 Andres Rodriguez > : > > > Hi Patrizio, > > > > I have an external dns providing name resolution for bare metal machines > >> and everything works fine. > >> Basically we

[Bug 1673253] Re: "Screen Display" icon is missing from System Settings

2017-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
I can confirm that downgrading from 15.04.0+17.04.20170314-0ubuntu1 to 15.04.0+17.04.20170213-0ubuntu1 makes the Display Icon return. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673253 Title:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1673253] Re: "Screen Display" icon is missing from System Settings

2017-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
I can confirm that downgrading from 15.04.0+17.04.20170314-0ubuntu1 to 15.04.0+17.04.20170213-0ubuntu1 makes the Display Icon return. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to unity-control-center in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1673253] [NEW] "Screen Display" icon is missing from System Settings

2017-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: After shoving in a new Nvidia GeForce 8400GS (and trying the proprietary drivers out), the Screen Display icon is completely missing from the Systems Settings on my machine. I'd kinda like it back. :/ Please let me know what other info you may need. ProblemType: Bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1673253] [NEW] "Screen Display" icon is missing from System Settings

2017-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: After shoving in a new Nvidia GeForce 8400GS (and trying the proprietary drivers out), the Screen Display icon is completely missing from the Systems Settings on my machine. I'd kinda like it back. :/ Please let me know what other info you may need. ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 1661691] Re: TERM=xterm enables mouse mode in vi, breaks pasting with middle mouse

2017-02-19 Thread LaMont Jones
Also true when TERM=screen -- I suspect it doesn't care what terminal you're using, if it can grab mouse events, it does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661691 Title: TERM=xterm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661691] Re: TERM=xterm enables mouse mode in vi, breaks pasting with middle mouse

2017-02-19 Thread LaMont Jones
Also true when TERM=screen -- I suspect it doesn't care what terminal you're using, if it can grab mouse events, it does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661691

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661691] Re: TERM=xterm enables mouse mode in vi, breaks pasting with middle mouse

2017-02-19 Thread LaMont Jones
A very unexpected, and totally unwelcome change to vim. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661691 Title: TERM=xterm enables mouse mode in vi, breaks pasting with

[Bug 1661691] Re: TERM=xterm enables mouse mode in vi, breaks pasting with middle mouse

2017-02-19 Thread LaMont Jones
A very unexpected, and totally unwelcome change to vim. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661691 Title: TERM=xterm enables mouse mode in vi, breaks pasting with middle mouse To manage

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1640147] Re: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6 address for $IFACE" on commissioning

2017-02-14 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas/2.1 Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640147 Title: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6

[Bug 1640147] Re: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6 address for $IFACE" on commissioning

2017-02-14 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas/2.1 Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640147 Title: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6 address for $IFACE" on

[Bug 1640147] Re: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6 address for $IFACE" on commissioning

2017-02-14 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: maas/2.1 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: maas/2.1 Milestone: None => 2.1.4 ** Changed in: maas/2.1 Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: maas Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1640147] Re: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6 address for $IFACE" on commissioning

2017-02-14 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: maas/2.1 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: maas/2.1 Milestone: None => 2.1.4 ** Changed in: maas/2.1 Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: maas Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1640147] Re: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6 address for $IFACE" on commissioning

2017-02-13 Thread LaMont Jones
The loop of output is caused by maas trying to get an ipv6 address in a loop, even though the interface clearly does not support ipv6. (If it did, there would be a link-local address.) ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1640147] Re: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6 address for $IFACE" on commissioning

2017-02-13 Thread LaMont Jones
The loop of output is caused by maas trying to get an ipv6 address in a loop, even though the interface clearly does not support ipv6. (If it did, there would be a link-local address.) ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1640147] Re: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6 address for $IFACE" on commissioning

2017-02-13 Thread LaMont Jones
tl;dr: dhclient -6 should be less spam-chatty in the presence of no ipv6 support. If dhclient logged that as one message, instead of 9 messages, then syslog would compress the output. The easiest way that I've seen to reproduce this is to boot with ipv6.disable=true on the kernel command line.

[Bug 1640147] Re: [2.1] rsyslog is flooded with "no link-local IPv6 address for $IFACE" on commissioning

2017-02-13 Thread LaMont Jones
tl;dr: dhclient -6 should be less spam-chatty in the presence of no ipv6 support. If dhclient logged that as one message, instead of 9 messages, then syslog would compress the output. The easiest way that I've seen to reproduce this is to boot with ipv6.disable=true on the kernel command line.

[Bug 1645912] Re: freeipmi ipmi-config --checkout lacks support for ipv6 lan parameters

2017-02-10 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: maas/2.1 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: maas-ipv6 ** Changed in: maas/2.1 Milestone: None => 2.1.4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1645912] Re: freeipmi ipmi-config --checkout lacks support for ipv6 lan parameters

2017-02-09 Thread LaMont Jones
Confirmed freeipmi-tools on xenial and yakkety. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1645912 Title: freeipmi

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Verified trusty using the same test as found in http://paste.ubuntu.com/23921176/ ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu Trusty) Milestone: None => trusty-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[ubuntu/trusty-proposed] bind9 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.12 (Accepted)

2017-02-03 Thread LaMont Jones
bind9 (1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.12) trusty; urgency=medium * Backport (70_precise_mtime.diff) 18b87b2a58d422fe4d3073540bf89b5a812ed2e5 to trusty. LP: #1553176 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:13:21 -0700 Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@canonical.com> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-d

[Group.of.nepali.translators] [Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-03 Thread LaMont Jones
** Description changed: Since 2.6, linux has supported nanosecond granular time in stat(2) returns. BIND has a comment in the code that it might use it, but continues to ignore it. As of 9.9.3b2, named checks the time of (at least) zone files on disk (expanding to include include

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-03 Thread LaMont Jones
** Description changed: Since 2.6, linux has supported nanosecond granular time in stat(2) returns. BIND has a comment in the code that it might use it, but continues to ignore it. As of 9.9.3b2, named checks the time of (at least) zone files on disk (expanding to include include

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-03 Thread LaMont Jones
** Description changed: Since 2.6, linux has supported nanosecond granular time in stat(2) returns. BIND has a comment in the code that it might use it, but continues to ignore it. As of 9.9.3b2, named checks the time of (at least) zone files on disk (expanding to include include

[ubuntu/yakkety-proposed] freeipmi 1.4.11-1.1ubuntu3~0.16.10 (Accepted)

2017-01-31 Thread LaMont Jones
-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@canonical.com> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeipmi/1.4.11-1.1ubuntu3~0.16.10 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:43:29 -0700 Source: freeipmi Binary: freeipmi-common freeipmi-tools

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] freeipmi 1.4.11-1.1ubuntu3~0.16.04 (Accepted)

2017-01-31 Thread LaMont Jones
-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@canonical.com> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeipmi/1.4.11-1.1ubuntu3~0.16.04 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:43:29 -0700 Source: freeipmi Binary: freeipmi-common freeipmi-tools freeipmi-

[Bug 1645912] Re: freeipmi ipmi-config --checkout lacks support for ipv6 lan parameters

2017-01-31 Thread LaMont Jones
Package verified in zesty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1645912 Title: freeipmi ipmi-config --checkout lacks support for ipv6 lan parameters To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1645912] Re: freeipmi ipmi-config --checkout lacks support for ipv6 lan parameters

2017-01-26 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-17.04 ** Also affects: freeipmi (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: freeipmi (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: maas Milestone: None => 2.2.0 **

[Bug 1645912] Re: freeipmi ipmi-config --checkout lacks support for ipv6 lan parameters

2017-01-25 Thread LaMont Jones
** Description changed: See also https://github.com/chu11/freeipmi-mirror/issues/8 and https://github.com/chu11/freeipmi-mirror/issues/12 -- freeipmi needs to successfully discover the ipv6 address of a hosts BMC. + + [Impact] + + * Machines with BMCs configured to use IPv6 addresses,

[Bug 1645912] Re: freeipmi ipmi-config --checkout lacks support for ipv6 lan parameters

2017-01-25 Thread LaMont Jones
** Summary changed: - freeipmi ipmi-config (and discovery) lacks ipv6 support + freeipmi ipmi-config --checkout lacks support for ipv6 lan parameters ** Description changed: - See also https://github.com/chu11/freeipmi-mirror/issues/8 -- freeipmi - needs to successfully discover the ipv6

[Bug 1658750] Re: fails to add search directive to resolv.conf

2017-01-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Note that while there is no DOMAINSEARCH, DNSDOMAIN needs to translate into something (domain or search directive), and only one of those will be honored by the resolver (they overwrite each other, per the specification). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1658750] [NEW] fails to add search directive to resolv.conf

2017-01-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: When open-iscsi creates /etc/resolv.conf, it fails to add the domain name to resolv.conf: See also http://askubuntu.com/questions/873701/maas-node-unable-to- resolve-its-own-hostname/874005 ubuntu@resolve:~$ cat /run/net-ens3.conf DEVICE='ens3' PROTO='dhcp'

Bug#820974: bind9 crypto issue

2017-01-20 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:35:16PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > I believe this is a serious bug, since it affects the most common way > to deploy bind9 server which is in a chroot. > In my opinion, we should probably not release stable stretch with > bind9 in this state. > > This is

Bug#820974: bind9 crypto issue

2017-01-20 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:35:16PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > I believe this is a serious bug, since it affects the most common way > to deploy bind9 server which is in a chroot. > In my opinion, we should probably not release stable stretch with > bind9 in this state. > > This is

Bug#851489: Updated Russian debconf translation

2017-01-15 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 06:09:35PM +0300, Sergey Alyoshin wrote: > Package: postfix > Version: 3.1.3-6 > Priority: wishlist > Tags: l10n patch This file is unchanged from one that landed in the source tree on the 9th.. Was that intentional? lamont

[Bug 1655049] Re: [2.1] netaddr raises IndexError when looking up some OUI registrations

2017-01-10 Thread LaMont Jones
The actual source of the issue seems to be that netaddr indexes a file that it doesn't own (from ieee-data package), and then assumes that it won't change underneath it (either because of an ieee-data update, or a netaddr update in the case of a running process), which results in various

[Bug 1655049] Re: [2.1] netaddr raises IndexError when looking up some OUI registrations

2017-01-09 Thread LaMont Jones
Interesting point. Here is what I see: [xenial] ii ieee-data 20150531.1 all OUI and IAB listings ii python3-netaddr 0.7.18-1 all manipulation of various common netwo % python3 Python 3.5.2 (default, Nov 17 2016, 17:05:23) [GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux Type

[Bug 1628761] Re: [2.1] netaddr assumes MAC OUI is ascii

2017-01-09 Thread LaMont Jones
Likewise, as of 0.7.18-2, the mac prefixes 00:22:59, 00:23:89, and 5c:15:15 generate IndexError, because unicode is treated as ascii. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628761 Title:

[Bug 1655049] Re: List index out of range on main page and nodes page

2017-01-09 Thread LaMont Jones
MAAS was incomplete in the workaround for Bug#1628761. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655049 Title: List index out of range on main page and nodes page To manage notifications

[Bug 1655049] Re: List index out of range on main page and nodes page

2017-01-09 Thread LaMont Jones
I found some that exhibit the issue (00-22-59, 00-23-89) for starters. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655049 Title: List index out of range on main page and nodes page To manage

[Bug 1655049] Re: List index out of range on main page and nodes page

2017-01-09 Thread LaMont Jones
Can you provide the first 3 octets of one of the bad MACs? If you're not sure which one, the following is sure to catch it: sudo maas-region dbshell select distinct substring(cast(mac_address as varchar) for 8) from maasserver_interface; This would appear to be a bug in the python3-netaddr,

Accepted postfix 3.1.4-3 (source) into unstable

2017-01-09 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix postfix-ldap - LDAP map support

[Bug 1654453] Re: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1

2017-01-07 Thread LaMont Jones
There is a new test version in the ppa. This one built. :/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654453 Title: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1 To manage notifications

[Bug 1654453] Re: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1

2017-01-07 Thread LaMont Jones
@mamarley - A postfix package with the fix (for testing) is in ppa:lamont/postfix -- can you confirm that the bug is fixed with that version? thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1654453] Re: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1

2017-01-07 Thread LaMont Jones
3.1.4-3 should be uploaded this weekend, with the fix. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #850430 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850430 ** Also affects: postfix (Debian) via

Re: [Bug 1654453] Re: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1

2017-01-07 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 01:26:41PM -, Michael Marley wrote: > I just upgraded and still have exactly the same problem as before. During the upgrade, did it say that it was changing master.cf as below? In master.cf: using smtp binary for lmtp service (symlink removed) In either case,

Accepted postfix 3.1.4-2 (source) into unstable

2017-01-06 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix postfix-ldap - LDAP map support

[Bug 1654453] Re: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1

2017-01-06 Thread LaMont Jones
mitted ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654453 Title: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working i

[Bug 1654453] Re: LMTP delivery to Dovecot stops working in 3.1.4-1

2017-01-06 Thread LaMont Jones
Is it possible that there is trailing whitespace on the lmtp line in master.cf? That would explain the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654453 Title: LMTP delivery to Dovecot

Bug#850430: postfix 3.1.4-1 breaks on lmtp interface

2017-01-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > $ grep lmtp /etc/postfix/master.cf > lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp Is there by any chance any trailing whitespace on that line? lamont

Bug#850430: postfix 3.1.4-1 breaks on lmtp interface

2017-01-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > $ grep lmtp /etc/postfix/master.cf > lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp Is there by any chance any trailing whitespace on that line? lamont

Accepted postfix 3.1.4-1 (source) into unstable

2017-01-05 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix postfix-ldap - LDAP map support

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1632808] Re: Consider supporting IPv6 autoconf in configure_networking

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
I am also not aware of anyone in the MAAS space who _wants_ autoconf for ipv6 networks. I am aware of at least one who wants it OFF for their networks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1632808] Re: Consider supporting IPv6 autoconf in configure_networking

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
And leaving it triaged for MAAS, since once initramfs-tools supports it, MAAS will need to propagate that to the UI. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1632808] Re: Consider supporting IPv6 autoconf in configure_networking

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
And leaving it triaged for MAAS, since once initramfs-tools supports it, MAAS will need to propagate that to the UI. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632808 Title: Consider supporting

[Bug 1632480] Re: Latest Yakkety grub timesout when attempting to UEFI boot over IPv6

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
I am not able to reproduce this. Is this still an issue for the machine in question? ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1632808] Re: configure_networking exits without any ipv6 routes

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Converting this to be the bug for ip6=stateless (or ip6=autoconf?), as the rest of it was solved with 1621507. ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Released ** Summary changed: - configure_networking exits without any ipv6 routes + Consider supporting IPv6 autoconf in

[Bug 1632808] Re: Consider supporting IPv6 autoconf in configure_networking

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
I am also not aware of anyone in the MAAS space who _wants_ autoconf for ipv6 networks. I am aware of at least one who wants it OFF for their networks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1632808] Re: configure_networking exits without any ipv6 routes

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Converting this to be the bug for ip6=stateless (or ip6=autoconf?), as the rest of it was solved with 1621507. ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Released ** Summary changed: - configure_networking exits without any ipv6 routes + Consider supporting IPv6 autoconf in

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1639930] Re: initramfs network configuration ignored if only ip6= on kernel command line

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
No maas changes were required here, since it always specifies both ip= and ip6= ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.

[Group.of.nepali.translators] [Bug 1639930] Re: initramfs network configuration ignored if only ip6= on kernel command line

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
No maas changes were required here, since it always specifies both ip= and ip6= ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial. Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu

[Bug 1639930] Re: initramfs network configuration ignored if only ip6= on kernel command line

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
No maas changes were required here, since it always specifies both ip= and ip6= ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639930 Title:

[Bug 1618543] Re: freeipmi lacks IPv6 support

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
No maas changes were needed here. ** Changed in: maas Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618543 Title: freeipmi lacks IPv6 support To manage

[Group.of.nepali.translators] [Bug 1618543] Re: freeipmi lacks IPv6 support

2017-01-04 Thread LaMont Jones
No maas changes were needed here. ** Changed in: maas Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial. Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs

[Bug 1229458] Re: grubnetx64.efi tftp client does not work over ipv6

2017-01-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Verified that both IPv4 pxeboot and IPv6 uefi boot cleanly into MAAS. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229458

REVISED: postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
0. Thanks in advance, # # Catalan translation for postfix package. # Copyright (C) 2012 LaMont Jones. # This file is distributed under the same license as the postfix package. # # Jordà Polo <jo...@ettin.org>, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2012. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-

REVISED: postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, [Right after I sent the last email, review found that one more template was needed. Please do the translations based on this email, not the earlier one.] You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages

REVISED: postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, [Right after I sent the last email, review found that one more template was needed. Please do the translations based on this email, not the earlier one.] You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages

REVISED: postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, [Right after I sent the last email, review found that one more template was needed. Please do the translations based on this email, not the earlier one.] You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages

REVISED: postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, [Right after I sent the last email, review found that one more template was needed. Please do the translations based on this email, not the earlier one.] You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages

REVISED: postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, [Right after I sent the last email, review found that one more template was needed. Please do the translations based on this email, not the earlier one.] You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages

REVISED: postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, [Right after I sent the last email, review found that one more template was needed. Please do the translations based on this email, not the earlier one.] You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages

REVISED: postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, [Right after I sent the last email, review found that one more template was needed. Please do the translations based on this email, not the earlier one.] You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages

REVISED: postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, [Right after I sent the last email, review found that one more template was needed. Please do the translations based on this email, not the earlier one.] You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages

postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
file to me, or submit it as a wishlist bug against postfix. The deadline for receiving the updated translation is Sun, 08 Jan 2017 17:00:00 -0700. Thanks in advance, lamont # # Catalan translation for postfix package. # Copyright (C) 2012 LaMont Jones. # This file is distributed under the sa

postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.1.3-6: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-12-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

[Bug 1645912] Re: freeipmi ipmi-config (and discovery) lacks ipv6 support

2016-12-19 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: maas Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1645912 Title: freeipmi ipmi-config (and discovery) lacks ipv6 support To manage

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1629972] Re: networking stop incorrectly disconnects from (network) root filesystem

2016-12-19 Thread LaMont Jones
Verification was done by using MAAS to enlist, commission, and deploy xenial (with the fix) on a machine. Previously, it failed to shut down, because the root disk got unmounted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Bug 1629972] Re: networking stop incorrectly disconnects from (network) root filesystem

2016-12-19 Thread LaMont Jones
Verification was done by using MAAS to enlist, commission, and deploy xenial (with the fix) on a machine. Previously, it failed to shut down, because the root disk got unmounted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1629972] Re: networking stop incorrectly disconnects from (network) root filesystem

2016-12-19 Thread LaMont Jones
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1629972 Title: networking stop incorrectly disconnects from (network) root

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >