Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] sysusers.d support applies %attr() ownership before creating sysusers (Issue #3073)

2024-05-03 Thread Martin Pitt
Thanks @ffesti ! So I suppose this should be closed upstream, and I'll create a bugzilla instead? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3073#issuecomment-2092433241 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Automatically create users and groups from sysusers.d(5) files (PR #2432)

2024-05-02 Thread Martin Pitt
This helped a lot, but it's still applying the user creation and `%attr()` processing in the wrong order. I filed issue #3073 about it. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2432#issuecomment-2092096531 You are receiving this

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] sysusers.d support applies %attr() ownership before creating sysusers (Issue #3073)

2024-05-02 Thread Martin Pitt
We are currently [trying to move our project to systemd-sysusers](https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/20365), away from manual `useradd` calls in the package's `%pre` script. The [rpm manual](https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/users_and_groups.html) claims > Rpm

[Bug 2064089] Re: python-gssapi 1.8.2-1ubuntu2 regression: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'gssapi.raw'

2024-05-01 Thread Martin Pitt
This was "fixed" in noble by clearing out noble-proposed, thanks! That took care of the worst fallout. ** Changed in: python-gssapi (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2064089] [NEW] python-gssapi 1.8.2-1ubuntu2 regression: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'gssapi.raw'

2024-04-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: The recent no-change rebuild in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-gssapi/1.8.2-1ubuntu2 regressed. With -1ubuntu1, the import works: python3 -c 'import gssapi' but with -1ubuntu2, it crashes with Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File

[Bug 2060275] Re: pmproxy crash at startup in libpcp_web.so.1

2024-04-17 Thread Martin Pitt
There are no patches, it's a straight import of the source package into Ubuntu. Ubuntu *does* have different compiler options than Debian, so that may be a factor. Otherwise I'm in the same boat as you -- there's only so much time I can throw at this (I've done full-time "investigate, report, and

Bug#1069059: cockpit update from DSA-5655-1 without binary builds (build failures)

2024-04-16 Thread Martin Pitt
log 2024-04-02 11:11:19.0 +0200 +++ cockpit-287.1/debian/changelog 2024-04-16 09:20:17.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +cockpit (287.1-0+deb12u2) bookworm-security; urgency=medium + + * Add 0001-ssh-Use-valid-host-name-in-test-sshbridge.patch: +Use valid host name in tes

Bug#1069059: cockpit update from DSA-5655-1 without binary builds (build failures)

2024-04-16 Thread Martin Pitt
log 2024-04-02 11:11:19.0 +0200 +++ cockpit-287.1/debian/changelog 2024-04-16 09:20:17.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +cockpit (287.1-0+deb12u2) bookworm-security; urgency=medium + + * Add 0001-ssh-Use-valid-host-name-in-test-sshbridge.patch: +Use valid host name in tes

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#1069059: cockpit update from DSA-5655-1 without binary builds (build failures)

2024-04-16 Thread Martin Pitt
log 2024-04-02 11:11:19.0 +0200 +++ cockpit-287.1/debian/changelog 2024-04-16 09:20:17.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +cockpit (287.1-0+deb12u2) bookworm-security; urgency=medium + + * Add 0001-ssh-Use-valid-host-name-in-test-sshbridge.patch: +Use valid host name in tes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061726] [NEW] rsyslog apparmor denial on reading /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6

2024-04-15 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: One of our Cockpit integration tests [1] spotted an AppArmor regression in rsyslogd. This is coincidental, the test passes and it doesn't do anything with rsyslogd -- just something happens to happen in the background to trigger this (and I can actually reproduce it locally

[Bug 2061726] [NEW] rsyslog apparmor denial on reading /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6

2024-04-15 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: One of our Cockpit integration tests [1] spotted an AppArmor regression in rsyslogd. This is coincidental, the test passes and it doesn't do anything with rsyslogd -- just something happens to happen in the background to trigger this (and I can actually reproduce it locally

[Freeipa] [Bug 2061055] Re: Joining IPA domain does not restart ssh -- 'sshd.service' alias is not set up by default

2024-04-12 Thread Martin Pitt
Yeah, I could live with that -- but TBH I still consider this mostly a bug in openssh. querying the status of sshd.service really should work. Arch, RHEL, Fedora, OpenSUSE etc. all call this sshd.service. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA, which is

[Bug 2061055] Re: Joining IPA domain does not restart ssh -- 'sshd.service' alias is not set up by default

2024-04-12 Thread Martin Pitt
Yeah, I could live with that -- but TBH I still consider this mostly a bug in openssh. querying the status of sshd.service really should work. Arch, RHEL, Fedora, OpenSUSE etc. all call this sshd.service. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061055] Re: Joining IPA domain does not restart ssh -- 'sshd.service' alias is not set up by default

2024-04-12 Thread Martin Pitt
Yeah, I could live with that -- but TBH I still consider this mostly a bug in openssh. querying the status of sshd.service really should work. Arch, RHEL, Fedora, OpenSUSE etc. all call this sshd.service. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061055] Re: Joining IPA domain does not restart ssh -- 'sshd.service' alias is not set up by default

2024-04-12 Thread Martin Pitt
Timo: It doesn't fail on Debian. See the "That works in Debian because.." in the description (TL/DR: Debian doesn't enable ssh.socket, but ssh.service, which sets up the symlink) ** Description changed: Joining a FreeIPA domain reconfigures SSH. E.g. it enables GSSAPI authentication in

[Freeipa] [Bug 2061055] Re: Joining IPA domain does not restart ssh -- 'sshd.service' alias is not set up by default

2024-04-12 Thread Martin Pitt
Timo: It doesn't fail on Debian. See the "That works in Debian because.." in the description (TL/DR: Debian doesn't enable ssh.socket, but ssh.service, which sets up the symlink) ** Description changed: Joining a FreeIPA domain reconfigures SSH. E.g. it enables GSSAPI authentication in

[Bug 2061055] Re: Joining IPA domain does not restart ssh -- 'sshd.service' alias is not set up by default

2024-04-12 Thread Martin Pitt
Timo: It doesn't fail on Debian. See the "That works in Debian because.." in the description (TL/DR: Debian doesn't enable ssh.socket, but ssh.service, which sets up the symlink) ** Description changed: Joining a FreeIPA domain reconfigures SSH. E.g. it enables GSSAPI authentication in

[Freeipa] [Bug 1946244] Re: When installing/uninstalling with realmd, uninstalling crashes with ScriptError

2024-04-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Confirmed in current noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA, which is subscribed to freeipa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946244 Title: When installing/uninstalling with realmd, uninstalling crashes with ScriptError Status in freeipa

[Bug 1946244] Re: When installing/uninstalling with realmd, uninstalling crashes with ScriptError

2024-04-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Confirmed in current noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946244 Title: When installing/uninstalling with realmd, uninstalling crashes with ScriptError To manage notifications

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061055] [NEW] Joining IPA domain does not restart ssh -- 'sshd.service' alias is not set up by default

2024-04-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: Joining a FreeIPA domain reconfigures SSH. E.g. it enables GSSAPI authentication in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/04-ipa.conf . After that, it tries to restart sshd, but that fails as "sshd.service" is not a thing on Ubuntu: 2024-04-12T03:10:57Z DEBUG args=['/bin/systemctl',

[Bug 2061055] [NEW] Joining IPA domain does not restart ssh -- 'sshd.service' alias is not set up by default

2024-04-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: Joining a FreeIPA domain reconfigures SSH. E.g. it enables GSSAPI authentication in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/04-ipa.conf . After that, it tries to restart sshd, but that fails as "sshd.service" is not a thing on Ubuntu: 2024-04-12T03:10:57Z DEBUG args=['/bin/systemctl',

[Freeipa] [Bug 2061055] [NEW] Joining IPA domain does not restart ssh -- 'sshd.service' alias is not set up by default

2024-04-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: Joining a FreeIPA domain reconfigures SSH. E.g. it enables GSSAPI authentication in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/04-ipa.conf . After that, it tries to restart sshd, but that fails as "sshd.service" is not a thing on Ubuntu: 2024-04-12T03:10:57Z DEBUG args=['/bin/systemctl',

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060615] Re: [noble] two versions of perl-modules are published, breaking pbuilder/debootstrap

2024-04-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Yay, today this is finally fixed, pbuilder creation and building a noble VM image finally works again \o/ Thanks! ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Bug 2060615] Re: [noble] two versions of perl-modules are published, breaking pbuilder/debootstrap

2024-04-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Yay, today this is finally fixed, pbuilder creation and building a noble VM image finally works again \o/ Thanks! ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2060014] Re: CVE-2024-2947 command injection when deleting a sosreport with a crafted name

2024-04-09 Thread Martin Pitt
In other words, having the fix in backports is fine I think. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060014 Title: CVE-2024-2947 command injection when deleting a sosreport with a crafted

[Bug 2060014] Re: CVE-2024-2947 command injection when deleting a sosreport with a crafted name

2024-04-09 Thread Martin Pitt
Marc: Thanks -- no urgency from my side, I just wasn't sure about your current CVE "must/may fix" policies. ** Changed in: cockpit (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: Fwd: [Bug 2060275] [NEW] pmproxy crash at startup in libpcp_web.so.1

2024-04-09 Thread Martin Pitt
Nathan Scott [2024-04-09 17:30 +1000]: > > It's not really unknown, it's "just" a file conflict: > > Yeah - the unknown bit for me is "why tho" - I cannot see conflicting > files in those packages that would have any debug symbols (there's > some common directories... but no binaries shared

Re: Fwd: [Bug 2060275] [NEW] pmproxy crash at startup in libpcp_web.so.1

2024-04-09 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Nathan, Nathan Scott [2024-04-09 16:19 +1000]: > Is any of this getting through... ? Just checked the Ubuntu tracker > URL, and looks like every response Ken or I sent has been dropped on > the ground. Right, I didn't get any response either (not a surprise, as it's *first* Launchpad

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060615] Re: [noble] two versions of perl-modules are published, breaking debootstrap

2024-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Aside from curl this can be reproduced most quickly with sudo /usr/sbin/debootstrap --include=build-essential noble /tmp/n http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu Errors were encountered while processing: perl libdpkg-perl libperl5.38t64:amd64 dpkg-dev build-essential These are all ultimately

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060615] Re: [noble] two versions of perl-modules are published, breaking debootstrap

2024-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
I wonder where that comes from -- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+publishinghistory says that 5.38.2-3 was deleted, but only from noble-updates. In noble proper it is merely "superseded". https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/5.38.2-3 doesn't show it being published anyway, and it's

[Bug 2060615] Re: [noble] two versions of perl-modules are published, breaking debootstrap

2024-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Aside from curl this can be reproduced most quickly with sudo /usr/sbin/debootstrap --include=build-essential noble /tmp/n http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu Errors were encountered while processing: perl libdpkg-perl libperl5.38t64:amd64 dpkg-dev build-essential These are all ultimately

[Bug 2060615] Re: [noble] two versions of perl-modules are published, breaking debootstrap

2024-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
I wonder where that comes from -- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+publishinghistory says that 5.38.2-3 was deleted, but only from noble-updates. In noble proper it is merely "superseded". https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/5.38.2-3 doesn't show it being published anyway, and it's

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060615] [NEW] [noble] two versions of perl-modules are published, breaking pbuilder/debootstrap

2024-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: For the last two weeks, building noble VM images for our CI has been broken. Most of it was uninstallability due to the xz reset, but for the last three days, `pbuilder --create` has failed [2] because it gets perl and perl-modules-5.38 in two different versions: 2024-04-08

[Bug 2060615] [NEW] [noble] two versions of perl-modules are published, breaking pbuilder/debootstrap

2024-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: For the last two weeks, building noble VM images for our CI has been broken. Most of it was uninstallability due to the xz reset, but for the last three days, `pbuilder --create` has failed [2] because it gets perl and perl-modules-5.38 in two different versions: 2024-04-08

[Bug 2060014] Re: CVE-2024-2947 command injection when deleting a sosreport with a crafted name

2024-04-07 Thread Martin Pitt
> They didn't propagate yet due to noble being jammed so much This happened now \o/, so they are ready to go. ** Changed in: cockpit (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2060275] Re: pmproxy crash at startup in libpcp_web.so.1

2024-04-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Maybe the missing dbgsym packages are on purpose? The build log has this: # Note: --no-automatic-dbgsym not defined for all releases up to # and including Debian 8 (jessie), but defined after that # ... expect a warning on older releases, but no other ill # effects from the

[Bug 2060275] [NEW] pmproxy crash at startup in libpcp_web.so.1

2024-04-05 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: In Cockpit's CI we see a lot of pmproxy crashes like [1] in a test which starts/stops/reconfigures pmlogger, pmproxy, and redis. The journal (some examples are [2][3][4]) always shows a similar stack trace: pmproxy[9832]: segfault at 3 ip 767961047e45 sp 7ffe97e825d0

[Bug 2060275] Re: pmproxy crash at startup in libpcp_web.so.1

2024-04-05 Thread Martin Pitt
Sorry, clicked the wrong button, I'll expand the bug description. In the meantime, attaching the core dump. ** Attachment added: "core dump"

[Bug 2060014] Re: CVE-2024-2947 command injection when deleting a sosreport with a crafted name

2024-04-02 Thread Martin Pitt
Backporters: I uploaded backports from noble-proposed to mantic and jammy. They didn't propagate yet due to noble being jammed so much, but we do validate them on both releases upstream. I'll let you decide whether to accept or stall them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2060014] Re: CVE-2024-2947 command injection when deleting a sosreport with a crafted name

2024-04-02 Thread Martin Pitt
@Marc, security team: I'd like your opinion/preference/guidance for mantic: It currently has upstream version 300.1. Half a year ago we did two more upstream point releases for critical bug fixes (aimed at and uploaded to RHEL): https://github.com/cockpit- project/cockpit/releases/tag/300.2 and

[Bug 2060014] Re: CVE-2024-2947 command injection when deleting a sosreport with a crafted name

2024-04-02 Thread Martin Pitt
Note: I tried to add backports tasks, but there's neither a https://launchpad.net/jammy-backports nor a https://launchpad.net/mantic-backports project. But not a biggie, these will both get 314 as soon as it lands in noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2060014] [NEW] CVE-2024-2947 command injection when deleting a sosreport with a crafted name

2024-04-02 Thread Martin Pitt
and autopkgtest queue before it can land in noble proper (and thus the backports of mantic and jammy get updated). ** Affects: cockpit (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti) Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: cockpit (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Medium Status

Bug#1067208: umockdev: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

2024-03-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/martinpitt/umockdev/issues/216 Control: tag -1 upstream pending Hello all, Thorsten Glaser [2024-03-20 3:05 +]: > /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed > only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" >26 | # error

Bug#1067208: umockdev: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

2024-03-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/martinpitt/umockdev/issues/216 Control: tag -1 upstream pending Hello all, Thorsten Glaser [2024-03-20 3:05 +]: > /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed > only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" >26 | # error

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056739] Re: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="virt-aa-helper" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-12 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: chrony (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Bug 2056739] Re: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="virt-aa-helper" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-12 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: chrony (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2046477] Re: Enable unprivileged user namespace restrictions by default

2024-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Just to make sure that we really talk about the same thing: This bug sounds like it is *intended* that unshare --user --map-root-user /bin/bash -c whoami (as unpriv user) now fails in current Ubuntu 24.04 noble. That still worked in released 23.10. I am starting to test Cockpit on the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046477] Re: Enable unprivileged user namespace restrictions by default

2024-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Just to make sure that we really talk about the same thing: This bug sounds like it is *intended* that unshare --user --map-root-user /bin/bash -c whoami (as unpriv user) now fails in current Ubuntu 24.04 noble. That still worked in released 23.10. I am starting to test Cockpit on the

[Bug 1774000] Re: Fails to boot cirros QEMU image with tuned running

2024-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: cockpit-test -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774000 Title: Fails to boot cirros QEMU image with tuned running To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2040483] Re: AppArmor denies crun sending signals to containers (stop, kill)

2024-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: cockpit-test -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040483 Title: AppArmor denies crun sending signals to containers (stop, kill) To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 2056768] [NEW] apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="rsyslogd" name="/run/systemd/sessions/"

2024-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: There is an AppArmor regression in current noble. In cockpit we recently started to test on noble (to prevent the "major regressions after release" fiasco from 23.10 again). For some weird reason, rsyslog is installed *by default* [1] in the cloud images. That is a rather

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056768] [NEW] apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="rsyslogd" name="/run/systemd/sessions/"

2024-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: There is an AppArmor regression in current noble. In cockpit we recently started to test on noble (to prevent the "major regressions after release" fiasco from 23.10 again). For some weird reason, rsyslog is installed *by default* [1] in the cloud images. That is a rather

[Bug 2056747] Re: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="/usr/sbin/chronyd" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056739 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056739 Absolutely agree, thanks Christian! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056747 Title:

[Bug 2056747] [NEW] apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="/usr/sbin/chronyd" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: Merely booting current noble cloud image with "chrony" installed causes this: audit: type=1400 audit(1710152842.540:107): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="/usr/sbin/chronyd" name="/etc/gnutls/config" pid=878 comm="chronyd" requested_mask="r"

[Bug 2056739] [NEW] apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="virt-aa-helper" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: Running any VM in libvirt causes a new AppArmor violation in current noble. This is a regression, this didn't happen in any previous release. Reproducer: virt-install --memory 50 --pxe --virt-type qemu --os-variant alpinelinux3.8 --disk none --wait 0 --name test1 (This

Bug#1062354: libatomic1: 14-20240127-1 missing libat_test_and_set_1_i2

2024-02-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: severity 1061370 grave Control: forcemerge -1 1061370 Matthias Klose [2024-02-01 8:30 +0100]: > please don't file duplicate reports, see #1061370 Ah, sorry -- it wasn't clear from the title that it was about this problem, nor was it RC. Marking a duplicate, so that it's easier to find.

Bug#1062354: libatomic1: 14-20240127-1 missing libat_test_and_set_1_i2

2024-02-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: severity 1061370 grave Control: forcemerge -1 1061370 Matthias Klose [2024-02-01 8:30 +0100]: > please don't file duplicate reports, see #1061370 Ah, sorry -- it wasn't clear from the title that it was about this problem, nor was it RC. Marking a duplicate, so that it's easier to find.

Bug#1062354: libatomic1: 14-20240127-1 missing libat_test_and_set_1_i2

2024-02-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: severity 1061370 grave Control: forcemerge -1 1061370 Matthias Klose [2024-02-01 8:30 +0100]: > please don't file duplicate reports, see #1061370 Ah, sorry -- it wasn't clear from the title that it was about this problem, nor was it RC. Marking a duplicate, so that it's easier to find.

Bug#1062354: libatomic1: 14-20240127-1 missing libat_test_and_set_1_i2

2024-01-31 Thread Martin Pitt
Package: libatomic1 Version: 14-20240127-1 Severity: grave Justification: breaks a lot of unrelated packages Hello, yesterday's cockpit armel build failed [1] on armel like this in the ./configure test for the PCP library: | configure:6158: gcc -o conftest -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

Bug#1062354: libatomic1: 14-20240127-1 missing libat_test_and_set_1_i2

2024-01-31 Thread Martin Pitt
Package: libatomic1 Version: 14-20240127-1 Severity: grave Justification: breaks a lot of unrelated packages Hello, yesterday's cockpit armel build failed [1] on armel like this in the ./configure test for the PCP library: | configure:6158: gcc -o conftest -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

Bug#1062354: libatomic1: 14-20240127-1 missing libat_test_and_set_1_i2

2024-01-31 Thread Martin Pitt
Package: libatomic1 Version: 14-20240127-1 Severity: grave Justification: breaks a lot of unrelated packages Hello, yesterday's cockpit armel build failed [1] on armel like this in the ./configure test for the PCP library: | configure:6158: gcc -o conftest -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

Bug#1061825: python-dbusmock autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12

2024-01-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: tag -1 pending Hallo Matthias, Matthias Klose [2024-01-29 21:27 +0100]: > 636s NO TESTS RAN (skipped=4) > 637s autopkgtest [01:57:06]: test upstream: ---] > 637s autopkgtest [01:57:06]: test upstream: - - - - - - - - - - results - - > - - - - - - - - > 637s upstream

Bug#1061725: Info received (Bug#1061725: libvirt-daemon: Deleting external snapshot for non-running system VM fails with Permission Denied)

2024-01-29 Thread Martin Pitt
I can't make head or tail of this. aa-complain still enforces deny rules, there is no (discoverable) way to log deny rules, and grep -r deny /etc/apparmor.d | grep virt | grep -v /sys | grep -v /dev doesn't show anything which would apply to /var/lib/libvirt/. `aa-disable

Bug#1061725: libvirt-daemon: Deleting external snapshot for non-running system VM fails with Permission Denied

2024-01-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: retitle -1 libvirt-daemon: Deleting external snapshot for non-running system VM fails with AppArmor when stracing libvirt, this is what happens: 6557 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/var/lib/libvirt/images/test2.qcow2", O_RDWR|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) 6557 sendmsg(13,

Bug#1061725: libvirt-daemon: Deleting external snapshot for non-running system VM fails with Permission Denied

2024-01-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Package: libvirt-daemon Version: 10.0.0-1 When creating a trivial VM and doing an external snapshot if the VM is *not* running, deleting the snapshot fails. As root: qemu-img create -f qcow2 /var/lib/libvirt/images/test1.qcow2 10G virt-install --memory 50 --pxe --virt-type qemu --os-variant

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2049689] Re: linux-image-5.15.0-94-generic breaks partprobe on empty loopback device

2024-01-18 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: jammy regression-release ** Tags removed: regression-release ** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-signed in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049689 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2049689] Re: linux-image-5.15.0-94-generic breaks partprobe on empty loopback device

2024-01-18 Thread Martin Pitt
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-signed (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2049689] Re: linux-image-5.15.0-94-generic breaks partprobe on empty loopback device

2024-01-18 Thread Martin Pitt
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049689 Title: linux-image-5.15.0-94-generic breaks partprobe

Bug#1058214: sosreport: FTBFS -- NMU debdiff

2024-01-09 Thread Martin Pitt
: #1058214) + + -- Martin Pitt Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:16:54 +0100 + sosreport (4.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * d/p/0003-systemd-prefer-resolvectl-over-systemd-resolve.patch: diff -Nru sosreport-4.0/debian/patches/0004-unittest-assertEquals.patch sosreport-4.0/debian/patches/0004-unittest

Bug#1058214: sosreport: FTBFS -- NMU debdiff

2024-01-09 Thread Martin Pitt
: #1058214) + + -- Martin Pitt Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:16:54 +0100 + sosreport (4.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * d/p/0003-systemd-prefer-resolvectl-over-systemd-resolve.patch: diff -Nru sosreport-4.0/debian/patches/0004-unittest-assertEquals.patch sosreport-4.0/debian/patches/0004-unittest

Bug#1058214: sosreport: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'TailTest' object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'? -- NMU announcement

2024-01-09 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/3467 Control: tag -1 upstream pending Hello Lucas and Eric, I sent an upstream fix for this to the PR above. Their CI didn't even spot that error yet (argh big testing gaps). This has been open for a month now. As this threatens to

Bug#1058214: sosreport: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'TailTest' object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'? -- NMU announcement

2024-01-09 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/3467 Control: tag -1 upstream pending Hello Lucas and Eric, I sent an upstream fix for this to the PR above. Their CI didn't even spot that error yet (argh big testing gaps). This has been open for a month now. As this threatens to

Bug#1059467: python-dbusmock: new version 0.30.1-1 causes upower's autopkgtest to fail

2023-12-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: reassign -1 upower 1.90.2-7 Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream pending The upower test adjustment landed upstream, I'll cherry-pick it into Debian. Martin

Bug#1059467: python-dbusmock: new version 0.30.1-1 causes upower's autopkgtest to fail

2023-12-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: reassign -1 upower 1.90.2-7 Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream pending The upower test adjustment landed upstream, I'll cherry-pick it into Debian. Martin

Bug#1059467: python-dbusmock: new version 0.30.1-1 causes upower's autopkgtest to fail

2023-12-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: tag -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/upower/upower/-/merge_requests/207 Hello Luca, Luca Boccassi [2023-12-26 12:46 +0100]: > Not sure whether it was a legitimate change and upower's tests need an > update, or if it is a new bug, but 0.30.1-1 causes

Bug#1059467: python-dbusmock: new version 0.30.1-1 causes upower's autopkgtest to fail

2023-12-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: tag -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/upower/upower/-/merge_requests/207 Hello Luca, Luca Boccassi [2023-12-26 12:46 +0100]: > Not sure whether it was a legitimate change and upower's tests need an > update, or if it is a new bug, but 0.30.1-1 causes

Bug#1059061: libssh: CVE-2023-6004

2023-12-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Martin Pitt [2023-12-25 11:25 +0100]: > The new upstream release plus regression fix have propagated to testing, to > Ubuntu devel, and also is progressing well into Fedora. By now the tests have > validated it enough for me to be confident in the fixes. > > I prepared the

Re: libssh CVE-2023-6004, CVE-2023-6918, CVE-2023-48795

2023-12-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Sean and security team, Sean Whitton [2023-12-24 9:12 +]: > I have taken responsibility for fixing these CVEs in libssh in buster, > as part of Freexian-funded LTS work. I would like to see if I can help > get them fixed in bullseye & bookworm in parallel, to avoid a situation > where

Bug#1059061: libssh: CVE-2023-6004

2023-12-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Salvatore and all, Salvatore Bonaccorso [2023-12-22 20:34 +0100]: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 04:39:46PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > > Salvatore Bonaccorso [2023-12-22 13:20 +0100]: > > > > However, the fix for CVE-2023-6004 caused a regression: > > > > https:

Bug#1059061: libssh: CVE-2023-6004

2023-12-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Salvatore, Salvatore Bonaccorso [2023-12-22 13:20 +0100]: > > However, the fix for CVE-2023-6004 caused a regression: > > https://gitlab.com/libssh/libssh-mirror/-/issues/227 > > I will monitor this, and include the fix in the security upload once it is > > available (or presumably they'll

Bug#1059061: libssh: CVE-2023-6004

2023-12-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Salvatore, Salvatore Bonaccorso [2023-12-19 22:34 +0100]: > The following vulnerability was published for libssh. > > CVE-2023-6004[0]: > | ProxyCommand/ProxyJump features allow injection of malicious code > | through hostname I uploaded the new upstream security fix release 0.10.6 to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047082] Re: upgrading openssh-server failed: rescue-ssh.target is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it.

2023-12-20 Thread Martin Pitt
Fun, this isn't even reliable. The first atttempt failed: https://cockpit-logs.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/image-refresh- logs/ubuntu-stable-20231219-223939.log I retried the build now, no package or environment changes. Only daytime and timing (race conditions). Perhaps some interaction with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047082] Re: upgrading openssh-server failed: rescue-ssh.target is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it.

2023-12-20 Thread Martin Pitt
Argh -- I missed the alternative truth in that rescue-ssh.target shell code. So this message should pretty much *always* appear -- it's nonsense to actually try and restart rescue-ssh.target in the postinst, *always*. But it is a red herring due to the || true. The upgrade failed on something

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047082] [NEW] upgrading openssh-server always shows error: rescue-ssh.target is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it.

2023-12-20 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: In our project we regularly build Ubuntu VM images for current 23.10 (stable). In https://github.com/cockpit-project/bots/issues/5691 we ran into an upgrade failure of openssh-server. It starts with the current cloud image and then apt upgrades it, with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037703] Re: dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server doesn't ask questions again

2023-12-20 Thread Martin Pitt
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037703 Title: dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server doesn't ask questions again Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: New Bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037703] Re: dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server doesn't ask questions again

2023-12-20 Thread Martin Pitt
We just ran into this in https://github.com/cockpit- project/bots/issues/5691 when trying to refresh our Ubuntu 23.10 mantic VM image. It starts with the current cloud image and then apt upgrades it, with "DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive". openssh was updated a few days ago indeed: Setting up

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046158] Re: Updating wireguard-peer.allowed-ips gets wrong default netmask for IPv6 addresses

2023-12-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Excellent, thanks Danilo for the super fast fix! ⭐ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046158 Title: Updating wireguard-peer.allowed-ips gets wrong

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2046158] Re: Updating wireguard-peer.allowed-ips gets wrong default netmask for IPv6 addresses

2023-12-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Excellent, thanks Danilo for the super fast fix! ⭐ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046158 Title: Updating wireguard-peer.allowed-ips gets wrong default

Bug#1058577: scour: mark packages as "multi-arch: foreign"

2023-12-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: tag -1 pending Hello IOhannes, IOhannes m zmoelnig [2023-12-13 8:57 +0100]: > However, since 'scour' is not marked "Multi-Arch: foreign" (or "Multi-Arch: > allowed") which makes it somewhat awkward to use when cross-building packages > (that depend on 'scour'). > > I would therefore

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2046158] Re: Updating wireguard-peer.allowed-ips gets wrong default netmask for IPv6 addresses

2023-12-11 Thread Martin Pitt
** Description changed: In https://cockpit-project.org/ we have an integration test for NM+wireguard integration. That test starts with an IPv4-only connection: # cat /etc/netplan/90-NM-b5edee2d-c736-4827-bae3-c95e349cb73b.yaml network: - version: 2 - tunnels: - wg0: -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046158] Re: Updating wireguard-peer.allowed-ips gets wrong default netmask for IPv6 addresses

2023-12-11 Thread Martin Pitt
** Description changed: In https://cockpit-project.org/ we have an integration test for NM+wireguard integration. That test starts with an IPv4-only connection: # cat /etc/netplan/90-NM-b5edee2d-c736-4827-bae3-c95e349cb73b.yaml network: - version: 2 - tunnels: - wg0: -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046158] [NEW] Updating wireguard-peer.allowed-ips gets wrong default netmask for IPv6 addresses

2023-12-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: In https://cockpit-project.org/ we have an integration test for NM+wireguard integration. That test starts with an IPv4-only connection: # cat /etc/netplan/90-NM-b5edee2d-c736-4827-bae3-c95e349cb73b.yaml network: version: 2 tunnels: wg0: renderer:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2046158] [NEW] Updating wireguard-peer.allowed-ips gets wrong default netmask for IPv6 addresses

2023-12-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: In https://cockpit-project.org/ we have an integration test for NM+wireguard integration. That test starts with an IPv4-only connection: # cat /etc/netplan/90-NM-b5edee2d-c736-4827-bae3-c95e349cb73b.yaml network: version: 2 tunnels: wg0: renderer:

Re: Fwd: I would like to participate in the cockpit development groups

2023-12-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Neftali, Stef Walter [2023-12-11 10:01 +0100]: > -- Forwarded message - > Hello, I would like to participate in the cockpit development groups, > first of all collaborating with the Spanish translations, That would be great, ¡gracias!  Cockpit is translated on weblate:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040483] Re: AppArmor denies crun sending signals to containers (stop, kill)

2023-12-10 Thread Martin Pitt
I also tried aa-disable usr.bin.crun but that doesn't work either. I guess it's not really crun, but profile="containers-default-0.50.1", but that is created dynamically -- it's not anywhere in /etc/apparmor.d/. I grepped the whole file system for that: grep: /usr/lib/podman/rootlessport:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040483] Re: AppArmor denies crun sending signals to containers (stop, kill)

2023-12-10 Thread Martin Pitt
I tried a more targeted workaround, with aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.crun or alternatively (without apparmor-utils, which isn't on the default cloud image): sed -i '/flags=/ s/unconfined/complain/' /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.crun but for some reason that breaks podman entirely: #

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2040488] Re: loading lvm2 module crashes: udisks_module_lvm2_new: assertion 'UDISKS_IS_DAEMON (daemon)' failed

2023-12-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Exact same fix uploaded to -proposed SRU review queue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to udisks2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040488 Title: loading lvm2 module crashes: udisks_module_lvm2_new: assertion

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2040488] Re: loading lvm2 module crashes: udisks_module_lvm2_new: assertion 'UDISKS_IS_DAEMON (daemon)' failed

2023-12-07 Thread Martin Pitt
** Description changed: [Impact] Trying to load the lvm2 module crashes udisks immediately:    busctl call org.freedesktop.UDisks2 /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/Manager org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Manager EnableModule sb lvm2 true udisksd[5709]: cannot register existing type

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2040488] Re: loading lvm2 module crashes: udisks_module_lvm2_new: assertion 'UDISKS_IS_DAEMON (daemon)' failed

2023-12-05 Thread Martin Pitt
4 Date: Wed Oct 25 12:13:14 2023 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/udisks2/udisksd Package: udisks2 2.10.1-1ubuntu1 ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2040488] Re: loading lvm2 module crashes: udisks_module_lvm2_new: assertion 'UDISKS_IS_DAEMON (daemon)' failed

2023-12-05 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecide

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >