To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=24518
User acli changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|save-export
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|acli
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 24 13:09:38 -0800
2006 ---
[Note on Platform and OS: Observed currently on both Linux and Windows;
MacOS X
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 24 13:13:00 -0800
2006 ---
Created an attachment (id=35231)
Test case - ODT input file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 24 13:14:49 -0800
2006 ---
Created an attachment (id=35232)
Test case - PDF generated by native Export to PDF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 24 13:15:48 -0800
2006 ---
Created an attachment (id=35233)
Test case - screen shot showing the correct
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47809
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 24 13:30:31 -0800
2006 ---
The Japanese long accent should properly be entered as a macron. It is already
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 10 21:38:57 -0800
2006 ---
Report a bug can be found by reaching the Site map. This is probably a
reasonable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 10 21:44:35 -0800
2006 ---
It seems that the problem either has been silently fixed, or it is an
intermittent
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|openoffice.org IssueTracker
Assigned to:|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported by:|acli
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 09:06:25 -0800
2006 ---
1. Click Report a Bug in the navigation pane on the left
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=24518
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 9 20:16:58 -0700
2005 ---
This will take some time, as I only have a non-rpm Linux and a MacOSX box. I'll
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=24517
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 9 20:17:11 -0700
2005 ---
This will take some time, as I only have a non-rpm Linux and a MacOSX box. I'll
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 06:28:58 -0700
2005 ---
I assume the transparency feature you talk about is PDF transparency? but
100%
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17383
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 06:55:42 -0700
2005 ---
Just wondering, if the issue causes wrong output when importing documents, why
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 5 08:24:41 -0700
2005 ---
No.
This bug is about no fill not being equal to 100% transparency. In other
14 matches
Mail list logo